‘We just have to remind ourselves that we started the season 0-2. I believe our team knows how to bounce back,’ says UP coach Goldwin Monteverde as the Maroons ‘We just have to remind ourselves that we started the season 0-2. I believe our team knows how to bounce back,’ says UP coach Goldwin Monteverde as the Maroons

It can’t all be Harold: UP coach calls for more contributions in Game 2

2025/12/12 10:30

MANILA, Philippines – UP rode Harold Alarcon’s heroics in Game 1. They are not betting the season on that again in Game 2. 

After their 74-70 loss to La Salle, UP head coach Goldwin Monteverde challenged his crew to step up and spread the scoring in the do-or-die Game 2 for the Fighting Maroons. 

“Whatever Harold did for us for this game, we need that. It’s just that as a team, they need to contribute. It’s not just him,” Monteverde said in Filipino, following Alarcon’s 34-point explosion that went for naught in Game 1. 

“I think the 34 points, of course, the team needs it. But it’s not just Harold who would win these finals for us. It should take a team to be able to overcome whatever we’re facing in terms of offense,” he added. 

Alarcon went 12-of-22 from the field and 10-of-17 inside the arc, while the rest of the defending champions combined for just 16-of-41 in the Game 1 loss.

He also dropped 20 in the first half, added 6 in the third, and tacked on 8 more in the fourth. The rest of the UP squad mustered only 4 points in the final frame as La Salle ran away with a 21 -12 closing burst.

Aside from Alarcon, only Francis Nnoruka cracked double digits for UP, delivering 13 points on 6-of-8 shooting and grabbing 6 boards.

Having been outplayed by La Salle down the stretch, Monteverde said his players need to prove they want it more every time they step on the floor.

“For me, every finals game, we should want it more, especially on the defensive end. We need to be stronger,” Monteverde said. “We need to toughen up even on offensive rebounding and stuff. I believe that there were certain parts of the game that we played well, but then we just need to be consistent about what we’re doing on both ends.”

This is UP’s fifth straight UAAP finals appearance under Monteverde, who took over the head coaching post in Season 84, the season they broke their 36-year title drought. 

Season 88’s finals also marked the third consecutive year La Salle and UP faced off in the men’s basketball finals. 

Still having some of the players from his first season as UP coach — including Alarcon, Terrence Fortea, and Gerry Abadiano —  Monteverde kept his full trust in the Fighting Maroons’ chances to go back-to-back this year. 

“So far, I’m confident. I really trust the team that they will bounce back from this. Learn from this, definitely. We’re still positive,” he said. 

UP won Game 1 of the past two season finales against La Salle. In Season 86, the Fighting Maroons succumbed to the then-Kevin Quiambao-led Green Archers before completing their redemption bid in Season 87. 

Earlier this season, the Fighting Maroons also started on the wrong foot, going 0-2 to start the tournament before rising to the second seed after the elimination round. 

Banking on UP’s resilience, Monteverde vowed to roll out key adjustments for Sunday’s Game 2 at the Mall of Asia Arena.

“It’s important for us in every game that everyone is going to the game ready. Whatever we face, we’ll fight for it. So, adjustment will come in the second game,” he said.

“This is not the first time we lost…We just have to remind ourselves that we started the season 0-2. I believe our team knows how to bounce back. We just lost a battle, but the war is not over yet. We still have two games left.” – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.008967
$0.008967$0.008967
+0.26%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10