U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
U.S. Community Banks Push to Close GENIUS Act Stablecoin “Yield Loophole”
2 min read
News Brief
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
Summary
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
What Banks Are Objecting To
- Stablecoin yield products offered by exchanges
- Ability to provide interest‑like returns without being banks
- Potential for consumers to treat yield‑bearing stablecoins as deposit substitutes
Banks argue this activity looks economically similar to deposits but operates outside the full banking regulatory framework.
Why This Matters
- Competitive pressure: Yield‑bearing stablecoins can attract funds away from community banks
- Regulatory boundary debate: Where to draw the line between payments, securities, and banking
- Policy precedent: How this issue is resolved could shape the future of on‑chain finance in the U.S.
At stake is whether stablecoin issuers and exchanges can compete on yield without bank charters.
The Counterargument
Crypto advocates contend that:
- Stablecoin yields often come from market activity or reserves, not lending deposits
- Users are not guaranteed principal the same way bank deposits are
- Innovation should not be constrained to protect incumbents
They argue consumer disclosure—not prohibition—is the right approach.
Broader Implications
- Could influence final GENIUS Act language
- May determine whether stablecoins evolve into cash‑like instruments or yield‑bearing financial products
- Signals rising tension as crypto competes directly with traditional banking services
Bottom Line
Community banks’ push to close the GENIUS Act’s stablecoin yield “loophole” highlights a core conflict: stablecoins are starting to compete with bank deposits. How lawmakers respond will shape whether yield remains a feature of U.S.‑regulated stablecoins—or is pushed back into the traditional banking system.
Market Opportunity
Union Price(U)
$0.001655
$0.001655$0.001655
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
You May Also Like
Galaxy Digital’s 2025 Loss: SOL Bear Market
The post Galaxy Digital’s 2025 Loss: SOL Bear Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Galaxy Digital, a digital assets and artificial intelligence infrastructure
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/04 09:49
Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference
The post Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The suitcoiners are in town. From a low-key, circular podium in the middle of a lavish New York City event hall, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took the mic and opened the Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference event. He joked awkwardly about the orange ties, dresses, caps and other merch to the (mostly male) audience of who’s-who in the bitcoin treasury company world. Once he got onto the regular beat, it was much of the same: calm and relaxed, speaking freely and with confidence, his keynote was heavy on the metaphors and larger historical stories. Treasury companies are like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in its early years, Michael Saylor said: We’ve just discovered crude oil and now we’re making sense of the myriad ways in which we can use it — the automobile revolution and jet fuel is still well ahead of us. Established, trillion-dollar companies not using AI because of “security concerns” make them slow and stupid — just like companies and individuals rejecting digital assets now make them poor and weak. “I’d like to think that we understood our business five years ago; we didn’t.” We went from a defensive investment into bitcoin, Saylor said, to opportunistic, to strategic, and finally transformational; “only then did we realize that we were different.” Michael Saylor: You Come Into My Financial History House?! Jokes aside, Michael Saylor is very welcome to the warm waters of our financial past. He acquitted himself honorably by invoking the British Consol — though mispronouncing it, and misdating it to the 1780s; Pelham’s consolidation of debts happened in the 1750s and perpetual government debt existed well before then — and comparing it to the gold standard and the future of bitcoin. He’s right that Strategy’s STRC product in many ways imitates the consols; irredeemable, perpetual debt, issued at par, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:12
HKMA Launches Fintech Blueprint with AI, DLT, Quantum and Cybersecurity Focus
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a Fintech Promotion Blueprint to support responsible innovation and fintech development in the banking sector.
Share
Fintechnews2026/02/04 10:20