Miner selling pressure has nearly disappeared from the Bitcoin market. Whether that absence is enough to matter depends on what fills the void.
The Miners’ Position Index tracks the ratio of miner outflows relative to their one-year moving average. When the reading is elevated, miners are sending more coins to exchanges than usual, increasing the potential for sell-side pressure from one of the market’s most consistent natural supply sources. When the reading is depressed, miners are sending significantly fewer coins than their historical average, indicating accumulation, anticipation of higher prices, or both.
The CryptoQuant chart covering 2016 through early 2026 shows the MPI alongside its 30-day and 200-day moving averages and Bitcoin’s price. The current reading sits at negative 1.04, one of the lowest in the metric’s history and only the third time the 30-day moving average has approached the negative 1 threshold.
Reading the chart from left to right, three red circles mark the prior instances where the MPI approached or touched the negative 1 level. The first appears in late 2016, early in Bitcoin’s pre-2017 bull run. The second and third appear in 2024, with the dotted arrow connecting the mid-2024 low to the subsequent price recovery that carried Bitcoin above $100,000. The current reading in early 2026 is marked with a question mark, the analyst’s framing of what comes next as genuinely unresolved.
The yellow shaded zones on the chart mark periods where MPI spiked above the 2 threshold, the red dashed horizontal line. Those elevated readings in 2019, 2020, and 2023 represent periods of heavy miner distribution, often coinciding with post-rally profit-taking or stress-driven selling during compressed margin environments. In each case those spikes were followed by periods of price consolidation or decline as the additional supply was absorbed.
The current setup is the structural inverse of those elevated readings. Miners are not selling. That removes a consistent source of downward pressure from the market.
The analytical nuance the source material identifies is important. Low MPI readings have not historically marked absolute price bottoms with precision. Looking at the prior instances on the chart, the more actionable signal emerged not at the extreme low itself but as the metric began recovering upward from depressed levels. That recovery indicated miner re-engagement alongside improving market conditions, a combination that proved more reliable than the low reading alone.
The current reading at negative 1.04 removes a structural headwind. It does not create a tailwind. What it signals is that one of the market’s most consistent natural sellers has stepped back. Whether price responds to that absence depends entirely on what demand-side forces are present to absorb existing supply and drive new price discovery.
That demand picture, based on the data covered throughout this week’s reporting, remains mixed. Spot ETF outflows have been persistent through March. Open interest sits near multi-month lows following the October deleveraging. Altcoin volumes have compressed to levels not seen since before the 2025 rally. The MPI extreme reflects a market with minimal miner-driven sell pressure. It does not reflect a market with sufficient demand to drive continuation on its own.
The historical pattern on the chart is consistent on this point. The 2016 negative MPI extreme preceded the 2017 bull run, but the entry signal was not the low itself. The 2024 readings near the negative 1 threshold were followed by the recovery toward $100,000, but again the confirmation came as the metric recovered rather than at its floor.
The current reading places Bitcoin in a condition where miner selling pressure is structurally absent. That is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a sustained recovery. When the MPI begins to rise from these levels, indicating that miners are re-engaging with the market as conditions improve, that transition is historically where the signal becomes more actionable. For now, the question mark on the chart is the honest assessment.
The post Bitcoin Miners Are at Their Least Active Sellers in Years: History Says That Is Only Half the Story appeared first on ETHNews.


