LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased SLM CorporationLOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased SLM Corporation

Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Encourages SLM Corporation (SLM) Shareholders To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class Action

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae (“SLM” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: SLM) securities between July 25, 2025 and August 14, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). SLM investors have until February 17, 2026 to file a lead plaintiff motion.

IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR SLM CORPORATION (SLM) INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A CLAIM TO POTENTIALLY RECOVER YOUR LOSSES IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT.

You can also contact the Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz to discuss your legal rights by email at info@frankcruzlaw.com, by telephone at (310) 914-5007, or visit our website at www.frankcruzlaw.com.

What Happened?

On August 14, 2025, investment bank TD Cowen issued a report stating that delinquencies on SLM’s private education loans in July 2025 were overall “higher (worse) than the seasonal . . . performance for July, driven by [an increase] in early stage delinquencies.”

TD Cowen’s findings directly contradicted the statements of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Peter Graham, made less than a month earlier, which asserted that SLM was observing delinquency rates that were merely “following the normal seasonal trends[.]”

On this news, SLM’s stock price fell $2.67, or 8.1%, to close at $30.32 per share on August 15, 2025, thereby injuring investors.

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) SLM was experiencing a significant increase in early stage delinquencies; (2) accordingly, Defendants overstated the effectiveness of SLM’s loss mitigation and/or loan modification programs, as well as the overall stability of the Company’s PEL delinquency rates; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:

If you purchased SLM securities, wish to learn more about this action, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please click HERE or contact us at:

Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 800

Telephone: 310-914-5007

Email: info@frankcruzlaw.com
Visit our website at: www.frankcruzlaw.com

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts

Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 800

Telephone: 310-914-5007

Email: info@frankcruzlaw.com
Visit our website at: www.frankcruzlaw.com

Market Opportunity
Sidekick Logo
Sidekick Price(K)
$0,004705
$0,004705$0,004705
-%0,50
USD
Sidekick (K) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Ozak AI’s $5M Presale Momentum Points Toward a Powerful Post-Listing Breakout — Forecasts Show $5–$10 Targets Within Reach

Ozak AI’s $5M Presale Momentum Points Toward a Powerful Post-Listing Breakout — Forecasts Show $5–$10 Targets Within Reach

As the extensive crypto market is fighting hard with volatility, the project that has continued to surge with unstoppable strength is Ozak AI ($OZ). The official
Share
Coinstats2025/12/27 06:30
Omeros Announces New Date for YARTEMLEA® Approval Conference Call

Omeros Announces New Date for YARTEMLEA® Approval Conference Call

— Omeros to Host Conference Call Wednesday, January 7, 2026 at 4:30 p.m. ET — SEATTLE–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Omeros Corporation (NASDAQ: OMER) today announced a revised
Share
AI Journal2025/12/27 07:46