Solana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabitsSolana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabits

Solana Absorbs One of the Largest DDoS Attacks Ever Recorded

2025/12/18 02:53

Solana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabits per second.

By scale, Solana says the incident ranks as the fourth-largest attack ever recorded across any distributed system.

That number alone is extreme. But the more important detail sits beneath it.

Despite the pressure, Solana’s network performance did not degrade. On-chain activity remained stable. Confirmations stayed under one second. Slot latency showed no abnormal behavior. From the outside, users wouldn’t have known anything unusual was happening.

Solana emphasized that this outcome is not accidental. One of the network’s core design goals is to continue operating normally under adversarial conditions, including large-scale network attacks. Over the past week, that principle moved from theory to practice.

While attacks of this magnitude often expose structural weaknesses, Solana continued processing transactions as usual. No emergency measures. No visible slowdown. No congestion-driven fee spikes.

The network just kept running.

What a 6 Tbps DDoS Attack Really Means

Six terabits per second is hard to visualize. It represents an enormous volume of data, comparable to millions of high-definition video streams hitting a single destination at the same time. Except here, the traffic wasn’t legitimate. It was deliberately malicious.

To understand why this matters, it helps to separate a DoS attack from a DDoS attack.

A Denial of Service attack usually comes from a single source. One device floods a target with traffic until it can’t respond. These attacks are disruptive, but relatively easy to stop. Block the IP address. The attack ends.

A DDoS attack works differently.

Instead of one device, attackers deploy thousands or millions of compromised machines, known collectively as a botnet. These machines can be everyday devices: computers, routers, cameras, and other internet-connected hardware infected with malware. Once controlled remotely, they act in unison.

Each device sends traffic simultaneously.

That “distributed” nature makes DDoS attacks far harder to mitigate. You’re no longer blocking one source. You’re facing traffic from across the internet, arriving all at once.

In blockchain systems, DDoS attacks often appear as transaction spam. Attackers attempt to overwhelm the network by submitting massive volumes of transactions or requests, hoping to slow block production, increase latency, or raise fees.

That’s exactly why Solana’s response is notable. The attack hit hard. And the network absorbed it.

How Solana Continued Operating Without Disruption

According to Solana, internal network data showed no measurable impact throughout the attack window. Confirmations stayed fast. Slot times remained stable. Validators stayed in sync.

This outcome reflects how the network is built.

Solana’s architecture emphasizes high throughput, parallel execution, and rapid message propagation between validators. Rather than forcing transactions through a narrow execution bottleneck, the network spreads workload across available resources.

During a DDoS event, that design matters.

Where some networks experience backlogs, rising fees, or validator delays under heavy spam, Solana showed none of those symptoms. The attack did not trigger congestion. Gas fees did not spike. Users did not experience delays.

From the perspective of applications running on Solana, DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, payments, and consumer apps, operations continued as normal.

That’s the key point. Resilience isn’t just about surviving an attack. It’s about doing so without degrading the user experience.

A Clear Contrast as Sui Faces Disruptions

The timing of this incident adds important context. During the same period, the Sui network was also targeted by a DDoS attack. The outcome there was very different.

Sui experienced delays in block production and periods of degraded network performance. Normal operations were impacted. The attack produced visible effects.

This contrast highlights a reality across blockchain infrastructure. Not all networks respond the same way under stress. DDoS resilience isn’t theoretical. It’s operational.

When a network slows under attack, applications suffer. Users feel it. Builders take note.

Solana’s experience shows the opposite scenario. Even under sustained pressure at historic scale, the network continued functioning as designed. That difference matters as blockchains move closer to real-world financial and consumer use cases.

Attacks aren’t rare. They’re expected. Networks that plan for them gain credibility.

What This Means for Solana and Its Ecosystem

Solana’s native asset, SOL, underpins transaction fees, staking, and validator incentives across the network. It plays a central role in securing the chain and enabling on-chain activity across DeFi, NFTs, payments, and consumer applications.

This event strengthens a narrative that has been building around Solana: performance under real conditions matters more than benchmarks.

It’s easy to claim speed in ideal scenarios. It’s harder to maintain stability when faced with sustained hostile traffic measured in terabits per second. Over the past week, Solana demonstrated that its design choices translate into real resilience.

That matters for developers deciding where to deploy applications. It matters for users who expect networks to remain available. And it matters as blockchains increasingly resemble critical infrastructure rather than experimental technology.

Solana’s message throughout the incident remained consistent and calm. The attack happened. It was massive. And it did not succeed.

In an environment where reliability is becoming a differentiator, that outcome speaks for itself.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Market Opportunity
Everscale Logo
Everscale Price(EVER)
$0.00679
$0.00679$0.00679
-0.43%
USD
Everscale (EVER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

The rapid progress of quantum computing is forcing the cryptocurrency industry to confront the problem that has long been treated as theoretical. Blockchains th
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/30 22:53
The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

There are many paths to wealth in the modern economy, but the one Gurhan Kiziloz took stands out for a simple reason: he built everything himself. By 2026, the
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 23:07
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28