When President Donald Trump returned to the White House on January 20, 2025, he brought about major changes in U.S. foreign policy. The Biden Administration viewedWhen President Donald Trump returned to the White House on January 20, 2025, he brought about major changes in U.S. foreign policy. The Biden Administration viewed

How Americans will 'pay the price' for 'rupture' Trump is causing

2026/01/23 00:31
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

When President Donald Trump returned to the White House on January 20, 2025, he brought about major changes in U.S. foreign policy. The Biden Administration viewed U.S. relations with Europe and Canada as crucial from a national security standpoint; Trump, in contrast, clashed with Canada over Prime Minister Mark Carney's insistence that America's northern neighbor will never become "the 51st state" and with European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) over his push to make Greenland, a longtime Danish colony, part of the U.S.

Optimists are hoping that after Trump's second term ends on January 20, 2029, the U.S. will repair its relationships with Canada and Europe. But Never Trump conservative David French, in a January 22 opinion column for the New York Times, laments that a "rupture" has occurred in U.S. relations with longtime allies — and he is pessimistic about the damage being repaired in the future.

French argues, "There will be more twists and turns, highs and lows, but I'm afraid it's time to recognize a sad reality — it's over…. The American-led alliance of democracies is in the midst of a rupture. We have broken faith with our allies, and our allies are choosing resistance over submission to Trump's aggression and greed."

French notes that during the 2026 World Economic Forum (WEF), now being held in Davos, Switzerland, tensions between Trump and longtime allies from Canada and Europe are impossible to miss. And the conservative columnist points out that Carney himself used the word "rupture" during the event.

"To enthusiastic applause in Davos," French observes, "(Carney) articulated a vision of how the 'middle powers' — nations like Canada — should respond to the great powers. It is decidedly not according to Trump's plan. First, Carney spoke the plain truth. 'For decades,' Carney said, 'countries like Canada prospered under what we called the rules-based international order. We joined its institutions, we praised its principles, we benefited from its predictability. And because of that, we could pursue values-based foreign policies under its protection'…. Even an imperfect system had profound benefits — as long as America remained both strong and virtuous."

French continues, "'American hegemony, in particular,' (Carney) said, 'helped provide public goods: open sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security and support for frameworks for resolving disputes.' That all appears to be over. We're not in a state of transition, but rather, one of 'rupture.' That's Carney's word for it, and he's right."

To make matters worse, French warns, the United States' "vaunted checks and balances are failing" as Republicans in Congress refuse to challenge Trump's "demonstrably irrational" actions with longtime allies.

"Impeachment and conviction are off the table," French observes. "There is no chance that Trump's cabinet of sycophants would invoke the 25th Amendment. Congress is led by invertebrates — with many of them apparently convinced that he'll subjugate the world in much the same way that he subjugated them, through threats, bluster and the unyielding support of millions in the MAGA mob…. On Tuesday, (January 20), Mark Carney called Donald Trump's bluff. Trump wants subjects, but he's getting rivals, and the American people will pay the price. "

David French's full New York Times column is available at this link (subscription required).

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26