The post U.S. court dismisses anti-terrorism lawsuit against Binance, plaintiffs given 60 days to amend appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A U.S. federal courtThe post U.S. court dismisses anti-terrorism lawsuit against Binance, plaintiffs given 60 days to amend appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A U.S. federal court

U.S. court dismisses anti-terrorism lawsuit against Binance, plaintiffs given 60 days to amend

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

A U.S. federal court has dismissed all claims brought against Binance under the Anti‑Terrorism Act, rejecting allegations that the crypto exchange assisted or conspired with terrorist organizations.

In a 62-page decision, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that plaintiffs failed to establish core elements of their case. The lawsuit involved 535 plaintiffs who alleged that Binance provided material support connected to 64 terrorist attacks.

According to the ruling, the plaintiffs did not sufficiently demonstrate that Binance knowingly assisted terrorist groups, participated in attacks, or conspired with terrorist organizations.

However, the court’s dismissal does not necessarily end the case. Plaintiffs have been granted 60 days to file an amended complaint, allowing them to revise their claims in light of a recent appellate ruling cited by the court.

Court rejects core allegations

The lawsuit accused Binance of facilitating transactions linked to terrorist groups through its platform. Plaintiffs argued that the exchange’s operations indirectly enabled financial flows connected to attacks.

The court ultimately determined that the complaint failed to establish a legal basis showing Binance intentionally supported or advanced terrorist activity.

The company also reiterated that it has invested heavily in compliance infrastructure and regulatory engagement in recent years.

Legal win comes amid ongoing scrutiny

The court decision arrives at a time when the exchange remains under broader scrutiny from regulators and lawmakers.

Earlier this month, Binance rejected allegations from U.S. lawmakers that the platform enabled $1.7 billion in cryptocurrency transfers linked to Iranian networks, disputing claims raised in a Senate inquiry citing investigative media reports.

That dispute stemmed from an inquiry led by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal, who requested records related to transactions involving entities such as Hexa Whale and Blessed Trust.

The senator’s investigation cited reporting suggesting that cryptocurrency transfers linked to Iranian networks and Russia’s sanctions-evading oil trade may have passed through the exchange.

Binance has denied those allegations, stating that it maintains strict know-your-customer procedures and sanctions screening, and that it cooperates with law enforcement.

Regulatory history still shapes Binance’s oversight

The company’s legal and regulatory position remains closely watched following its 2023 settlement with U.S. authorities.

That agreement saw Binance plead guilty to violations of anti-money-laundering and sanctions laws, pay a $4.3 billion penalty, and accept oversight by U.S. compliance monitors.

Founder Changpeng Zhao also pleaded guilty to a related charge and served a four-month prison sentence.


Final Summary

  • A U.S. federal court dismissed anti-terrorism claims against Binance, ruling plaintiffs failed to establish that the exchange knowingly assisted or conspired with terrorist organizations.
  • Plaintiffs were given 60 days to file an amended complaint, meaning the legal dispute could continue despite the dismissal.

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/u-s-court-dismisses-anti-terrorism-lawsuit-against-binance-plaintiffs-given-60-days-to-amend/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

The post Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Coinbase has filed a letter with the DOJ urging federal preemption of state crypto laws, citing Oregon’s securities suit, New York’s ETH stance, and staking bans. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal called state actions “government run amok,” warning that patchwork enforcement “slows innovation and harms consumers.” A legal expert told Decrypt that states risk violating interstate commerce rules and due process, and DOJ support for preemption may mark a potential turning point. Coinbase has gone on the offensive against state regulators, petitioning the Department of Justice that a patchwork of lawsuits and licensing schemes is tearing America’s crypto market apart. “When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken,” Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal tweeted on Tuesday. “This isn’t federalism—this is government run amok.” When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken. This isn’t federalism–this is government run amok. We just sent a letter to @TheJusticeDept urging federal action on crypto market structure to remedy this. 1/3 — paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) September 16, 2025 Coinbase’s filing says that states are “expansively interpreting their securities laws in ways that undermine federal law” and violate the dormant Commerce Clause by projecting regulatory preferences beyond state borders. “The current patchwork of state laws isn’t just inefficient – it slows innovation and harms consumers” and demands “federal action on crypto market structure,” Grewal said.  States vs. Coinbase It pointed to Oregon’s securities lawsuit against the exchange, New York’s bid to classify Ethereum as a security, and cease-and-desist orders on staking as proof that rogue states are trying to resurrect the SEC’s discredited “regulation by enforcement” playbook. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield sued Coinbase in April for promoting unregistered securities, and in July asked a federal judge to return the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:52
RCO Finance Review: AI Robo Advisor, Fees, Risks & Is It Worth It?

RCO Finance Review: AI Robo Advisor, Fees, Risks & Is It Worth It?

When you first hear about RCO Finance, it sounds like the future: an AI‑powered robo advisor that automatically manages investments across crypto and traditional
Share
Fintechzoom2026/03/12 15:13
SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto

SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto

The post SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cybersecurity company SlowMist has introduced
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 14:59