During the Vietnam War on January 27, 1973, President Richard Nixon issued an executive order calling for an end to the military draft in the United States. TheDuring the Vietnam War on January 27, 1973, President Richard Nixon issued an executive order calling for an end to the military draft in the United States. The

MAGA ramps up talk of 'reinstating a military draft'

2026/03/16 22:38
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

During the Vietnam War on January 27, 1973, President Richard Nixon issued an executive order calling for an end to the military draft in the United States. The Vietnam War continued until 1975, but Nixon's order marked the beginning of a transition to an all-volunteer military. Then, in 1980, during the Iranian Hostage Crisis, President Jimmy Carter reinstated draft registration — making it mandatory for males in the U.S. to register for the draft when they reached adulthood.

The draft itself, however, hasn't existed in the U.S. since the 1970s. But in an article published on March 16, Salon's Chauncey DeVega warns that with the U.S. now at war with Iran, a growing number of MAGA Republicans are talking about bringing back the draft.

"As President Trump's war against Iran spirals out of control," DeVega warns, "there is a growing concern he will order a ground invasion to remove the country's leaders and take control of its vast supplies of oil. The consensus among military and foreign policy experts is that such a move would be disastrous — and that its failure could be catastrophic enough to permanently damage America's standing as a superpower. But horrible outcomes have, at least to this point, not stopped Trump and his enablers from making irresponsible and dangerous decisions…. On March 8, Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo asked White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt a direct question. Would Trump consider ground forces or reinstating the draft to fight Iran?"

DeVega continues, "'I know a lot of politicians like to do that quickly,' she replied, 'but the president, as commander-in-chief, wants to continue to assess the success of this military operation. It's not part of the current plan right now, but the president, again, wisely keeps his options on the table.'"

DeVega notes that "reinstating a military draft" in the U.S. "would face enormous practical and political obstacles."

"The draft has not been part of American culture for 50 years, and Congress would need to update the Military Selective Service Act," DeVega explains. "Since the Trump Administration has yet to make a coherent case for why this war is necessary, many Americans would likely simply refuse to comply…. As a political matter, a draft for an already-unpopular war would likely leave Americans outraged and make landslide victories by Democrats over Republicans in the midterms and beyond a near certainty. Such a move could even cause a generational political realignment away from Trumpism and the GOP."

According to Steven Cash, director of the group Steady State, the Trump Administration would have a lot of explaining to if it seriously moved forward with an effort to bring back the draft.

Cash told Salon, "Absent a dramatic change in the nature of the conflict, the political system would struggle to justify a draft to the American public — and this is particularly true against a background of conflicting, and in some cases, patently false, reasons offered so far for a surprise attack on Iran. A draft becomes politically plausible only when the nation believes it cannot defend itself without it. At that point, the question would no longer be political convenience, but national survival."

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.905
$3.905$3.905
+2.03%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26