The most valuable assets in an economy are often the hardest to price. In the 1990s, the business world misjudged the Internet. This wasn’t a failure of imaginationThe most valuable assets in an economy are often the hardest to price. In the 1990s, the business world misjudged the Internet. This wasn’t a failure of imagination

Why Wall Street Can’t Price the Next Internet

The most valuable assets in an economy are often the hardest to price. In the 1990s, the business world misjudged the Internet. This wasn’t a failure of imagination; it was a failure of frameworks. Analysts tried to value the web by tallying up the revenues of companies like AOL and Netscape, missing the deeper significance of the open public infrastructure beneath them. The visible companies were easy to price. The invisible protocols powering them were not.

In those early days, the market could price a modem, but it couldn’t price the ability to send an email to anyone on earth for free.

Today, we are repeating that mistake with Ethereum.

Most investors understand Bitcoin, but they still categorize Ethereum as a cryptocurrency, a tech stock, or merely “one blockchain among many.” In reality, Ethereum is emerging as the next foundational layer of the Internet, this time not for information, but for value. And once again, the market is radically underestimating the utility of a public layer it cannot control.

To understand Ethereum’s economic significance, we must remember what the Internet actually did. It did not invent content or commerce; it created the open, neutral foundation that allowed anyone to build them. Its greatest contribution was permissionless innovation. Ethereum serves the same role, but in the economic realm. It makes value move the way the Internet made information move.

If the Internet produced universal communication, Ethereum produces universal economic coordination.

Quiet Infrastructure Just as no one thinks about TCP/IP when sending an email, few users think about Ethereum when using a stablecoin. Yet Ethereum quietly settles trillions of dollars annually. Stablecoins alone now move value at a volume that rivals traditional payment networks like Visa or Mastercard, and the vast majority of this liquidity relies on Ethereum’s architecture.

This is how network effects take hold: quietly, invisibly, beneath recognizable brands. In the 1990s, investors priced dot-com companies but barely understood the protocols that enabled the digital economy. Ethereum is trapped in this same narrative gap.

The core misunderstanding is simple: Ethereum is not a business. It has no CEO, no revenue maximization strategy, and no shareholders. It functions as a public good, more like a global settlement court or a digital electricity grid than a tech company.

Public infrastructure almost always looks undervalued in its early decades because it generates surplus rather than just revenue. The Internet’s protocols captured almost none of the trillions in value created on top of them. Electricity grids never captured the full value of the industrial economy they powered. Ethereum is the same: it enables far more economic activity than it directly monetizes.

This is why traditional metrics, fees, token price, and transaction counts are such poor indicators of Ethereum’s long-run importance. They measure the toll booth, not the economy.

The Trust Dividend Eventually, economists realized the Internet’s biggest impact wasn’t ad revenue, but consumer surplus, the enormous benefit users gained from open access. Ethereum offers a similar, yet unpriced, benefit: the “Trust Dividend.”

Because Ethereum settles transactions, validates ownership, and enforces agreements transparently and automatically, it collapses operational costs across finance and commerce. Everything from compliance to reconciliation to fraud management becomes cheaper when the underlying ledger is shared, standardized, and verifiable.

Businesses aren’t adopting Ethereum because they want to “use blockchain.” They are adopting it because it lowers friction. It introduces reliability. It reduces counterparty risk. It offers a global settlement environment that no competitor controls and no jurisdiction can unilaterally shut down.

This Trust Dividend,- the removal of the “middleman tax”, is where the real macro-level value lies.

The Settlement Layer for the Machine Age The global economy is becoming more digital, tokenized, and machine-driven. Major financial institutions are issuing tokenized funds, running digital treasuries, and using stablecoins for cross-border settlement. Perhaps most importantly, we are entering the age of AI agents, autonomous software that will need to transact. AI agents cannot open bank accounts. They will use the only permissionless, programmable settlement layer: Ethereum.

Just as the Internet created the conditions for modern communication, Ethereum is creating the conditions for programmable global value exchange. It is not competing with payment apps or banks. It is enabling an entirely new category of economic infrastructure.

It took decades for the world to understand the true value of the Internet’s public protocols. By the time the significance was clear, the transformation was already complete. Ethereum is following a similar trajectory, but with one key difference: this time, the infrastructure itself is investable.

The businesses and institutions that recognize Ethereum not as a speculative asset, but as the Internet’s settlement layer, will be the ones shaping the next era of digital business.

William Mougayar has 4 decades of experience in the tech industry and is the author of The Business Blockchain

Comments
Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.010127
$0.010127$0.010127
+1.47%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40
Stablecoin rewards provisions face industry test in Senate crypto bill

Stablecoin rewards provisions face industry test in Senate crypto bill

With the CLARITY Act scheduled for a markup on Thursday, some lawmakers could still be at odds over decentralized finance, stablecoins and ethical concerns.As US
Share
Coinstats2026/01/14 01:52
South Korea’s Korbit fined $2 million for money laundering

South Korea’s Korbit fined $2 million for money laundering

The post South Korea’s Korbit fined $2 million for money laundering appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The South Korean crypto exchange Korbit has accepted a
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 02:28