A Comprehensive Engineering and Operational Analysis of the Internet Archive

Introduction: The Hum of History in the Fog

If you stand quietly in the nave of the former Christian Science church on Funston Avenue in San Francisco’s Richmond District, you can hear the sound of the internet breathing. It is not the chaotic screech of a dial-up modem or the ping of a notification, but a steady, industrial hum—a low-frequency thrum generated by hundreds of spinning hard drives and the high-velocity fans that cool them. This is the headquarters of the Internet Archive, a non-profit library that has taken on the Sisyphean task of recording the entire digital history of human civilization.

Here, amidst the repurposed neoclassical columns and wooden pews of a building constructed to worship a different kind of permanence, lies the physical manifestation of the "virtual" world. We tend to think of the internet as an ethereal cloud, a place without geography or mass. But in this building, the internet has weight. It has heat. It requires electricity, maintenance, and a constant battle against the second law of thermodynamics. As of late 2025, this machine—collectively known as the Wayback Machine—has archived over one trillion web pages.1 It holds 99 petabytes of unique data, a number that expands to over 212 petabytes when accounting for backups and redundancy.3

The scale of the operation is staggering, but the engineering challenge is even deeper. How do you build a machine that can ingest the sprawling, dynamic, and ever-changing World Wide Web in real-time? How do you store that data for centuries when the average hard drive lasts only a few years? And perhaps most critically, how do you pay for the electricity, the bandwidth, and the legal defense funds required to keep the lights on in an era where copyright law and digital preservation are locked in a high-stakes collision?

This report delves into the mechanics of the Internet Archive with the precision of a teardown. We will strip back the chassis to examine the custom-built PetaBox servers that heat the building without air conditioning. We will trace the evolution of the web crawlers—from the early tape-based dumps of Alexa Internet to the sophisticated browser-based bots of 2025. We will analyze the financial ledger of this non-profit giant, exploring how it survives on a budget that is a rounding error for its Silicon Valley neighbors. And finally, we will look to the future, where the "Decentralized Web" (DWeb) promises to fragment the Archive into a million pieces to ensure it can never be destroyed.5

To understand the Archive is to understand the physical reality of digital memory. It is a story of 20,000 hard drives, 45 miles of cabling, and a vision that began in 1996 with a simple, audacious goal: "Universal Access to All Knowledge".7

Part I: The Thermodynamics of Memory

The PetaBox Architecture: Engineering for Density and Heat

The heart of the Internet Archive is the PetaBox, a storage server custom-designed by the Archive’s staff to solve a specific problem: storing massive amounts of data with minimal power consumption and heat generation. In the early 2000s, off-the-shelf enterprise storage solutions from giants like EMC or NetApp were prohibitively expensive and power-hungry. They were designed for high-speed transactional data—like banking systems or stock exchanges—where milliseconds of latency matter. Archival storage, however, has different requirements. It needs to be dense, cheap, and low-power.8

Brewster Kahle, the Archive's founder and a computer engineer who had previously founded the supercomputer company Thinking Machines, approached the problem with a different philosophy. Instead of high-performance RAID arrays, the Archive built the PetaBox using consumer-grade parts. The design philosophy was radical for its time: use "Just a Bunch of Disks" (JBOD) rather than expensive RAID controllers, and handle data redundancy via software rather than hardware.4

The Evolution of Density: From Terabytes to Petabytes

The trajectory of the PetaBox is a case study in Moore's Law applied to magnetic storage. The first PetaBox rack, operational in June 2004, was a revelation in storage density. It held 100 terabytes (TB) of data—a massive sum at the time—while consuming only about 6 kilowatts of power.1 To put that in perspective, in 2003, the entire Wayback Machine was growing at a rate of just 12 terabytes per month. By 2009, that rate had jumped to 100 terabytes a month, and the PetaBox had to evolve.1

The engineering specifications of the PetaBox reveal a relentless pursuit of density:

| Specification | Generation 1 (2004) | Generation 4 (2010) | Current Generation (2024-2025) | |----|----|----|----| | Capacity per Rack | 100 TB | 480 TB | ~1.4 PB (1,400 TB) | | Drive Count | ~40-80 drives | 240 drives (2TB each) | ~360+ drives (8TB+ each) | | Power per Rack | 6 kW | ~6-8 kW | ~6-8 kW | | Heat Dissipation | Utilized for building heat | Utilized for building heat | Utilized for building heat | | Processor Arch | Low-voltage VIA C3 | Intel Xeon E7-8870 (10-core) | Modern High-Efficiency x86 | | Cooling | Passive / Fan-assisted | Passive / Fan-assisted | Passive / Fan-assisted |

1

The fourth-generation PetaBox, introduced around 2010, exemplified this density. Each rack contained 240 disks of 2 terabytes each, organized into 4U high rack mounts. These units were powered by Intel Xeon processors (specifically the E7-8870 series in later upgrades) with 12 gigabytes of RAM. The architecture relied on bonding pair of 1-gigabit interfaces to create a 2-gigabit pipe, feeding into a rack switch with a 10-gigabit uplink.10

By 2025, the storage landscape had shifted again. The current PetaBox racks provide 1.4 petabytes of storage per rack. This leap is achieved not by adding more slots, but by utilizing significantly larger drives—8TB, 16TB, and even 22TB drives are now standard. In 2016, the Archive managed around 20,000 individual disk drives. Remarkably, even as storage capacity tripled between 2012 and 2016, the total count of drives remained relatively constant due to these density improvements.11

The "Blackbox" Experiment

In its quest for efficient storage, the Archive also experimented with modular data centers. In 2007, the Archive became an early adopter of the Sun Microsystems "Blackbox" (later the Sun Modular Datacenter). This was a shipping container packed with Sun Fire X4500 "Thumper" storage servers, capable of holding huge amounts of data in a portable, self-contained unit.

The Blackbox at the Archive was filled with eight racks of servers running the Solaris 10 operating system and the ZFS file system. This experiment validated the concept of containerized data centers - a model later adopted by Microsoft and Google—but the Archive eventually returned to its custom PetaBox designs for their primary internal infrastructure, favoring the flexibility and lower cost of their own open-source hardware designs over proprietary commercial solutions.12

Cooling Without Air Conditioning: The Funston Loop

One of the most ingenious features of the Archive’s infrastructure is its thermal management system. Data centers are notoriously energy-intensive, often spending as much electricity on cooling (HVAC) as they do on computing. The Internet Archive, operating on a non-profit budget, could not afford such waste.

The solution was geography and physics. The Archive's primary data center is located in the Richmond District of San Francisco, a neighborhood known for its perpetual fog and cool maritime climate. The building utilizes this ambient air for cooling. There is no traditional air conditioning in the PetaBox machine rooms. Instead, the servers are designed to run at slightly higher operational temperatures, and the excess heat generated by the spinning disks is captured and recirculated to heat the building during the damp San Francisco winters.9

This "waste heat" system is a closed loop of efficiency. The 60+ kilowatts of heat energy produced by a storage cluster is not a byproduct to be eliminated but a resource to be harvested. This design choice dramatically lowers the Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) ratio of the facility, allowing the Archive to spend its limited funds on hard drives rather than electricity bills. It is a literal application of the "reduce, reuse, recycle" mantra to the thermodynamics of data storage.3

Reliability and Maintenance: The "Replace When Dead" Model

With over 28,000 spinning disks in operation, drive failure is a statistical certainty.3 In a traditional corporate data center, a failed drive triggers an immediate, frantic replacement protocol to maintain "five nines" (99.999%) of reliability. At the Internet Archive, the approach is more pragmatic.

The PetaBox software is designed to be fault-tolerant. Data is mirrored across multiple machines, often in different physical locations (including data centers in Redwood City and Richmond, California, and copies in Europe and Canada).12 Because the data is not "mission-critical" in the sense of a live banking transaction, the Archive can tolerate a certain number of dead drives in a node before physical maintenance is required.

This "low-maintenance" design allows a very small team—historically just one system administrator per petabyte of data—to manage a storage empire that rivals those of major tech corporations. The system uses the Nagios monitoring tool to track the health of over 16,000 distinct check-points across the cluster, alerting the small staff only when a critical threshold of failure is reached.8

Part II: The Crawler’s Dilemma

Capturing a Moving Target

If the PetaBox is the brain of the Archive, the web crawlers are its eyes. Archiving the web is not a passive process; it requires active, aggressive software that relentlessly traverses the links of the World Wide Web, copying everything it finds. This process, known as crawling, has evolved from simple script-based retrieval to complex browser automation.

The Legacy of Heritrix

For much of its history, the Archive relied on a crawler called Heritrix. Developed jointly in 2003 by the Internet Archive and Nordic national libraries (Norway and Iceland), Heritrix is a Java-based, open-source crawler designed specifically for archival fidelity.16

Unlike a search engine crawler (like Googlebot), which cares primarily about extracting text for search relevance, Heritrix cares about the artifact. It attempts to capture the exact state of a webpage, including its images, stylesheets, and embedded objects. It packages these assets into a standardized container format known as WARC (Web ARChive).18

The WARC file is the atomic unit of the Internet Archive. It preserves not just the content of the page, but the "HTTP headers"—the digital handshake between the server and the browser that occurred at the moment of capture. This metadata is crucial for historians, as it proves when a page was captured, what server delivered it, and how the connection was negotiated.19

Heritrix operates using a "Frontier"—a sophisticated queue management system that decides which URL to visit next. It adheres to strict "politeness" policies, respecting robots.txt exclusion protocols and limiting the frequency of requests to avoid crashing the target servers.16

The Crisis of the Dynamic Web

However, Heritrix was built for a simpler web—a web of static HTML files and hyperlinks. As the web evolved into a platform of dynamic applications (Web 2.0), social media feeds, and JavaScript-heavy interfaces, Heritrix began to stumble.

Heritrix captures the initial HTML delivered by the server. But on a modern site like Twitter (now X) or Facebook, that initial HTML is often just a blank scaffolding. The actual content is loaded dynamically by JavaScript code running in the user's browser after the page loads. Heritrix, being a dumb downloader, couldn't execute this code. The result was often a broken, empty shell of a page—a digital ghost town.17

The Rise of Brozzler and Umbra

To combat the "dynamic web," the Archive had to evolve its tooling. The modern archiving stack includes Brozzler and Umbra, tools that blur the line between a crawler and a web browser.

Brozzler (a portmanteau of "browser" and "crawler") uses a "headless" version of the Google Chrome browser to render pages exactly as a user sees them. It executes the JavaScript, expands the menus, and plays the animations before capturing the content. This allows the Archive to preserve complex sites like Instagram and interactive news articles that would be invisible to a traditional crawler.17

Umbra acts as a helper tool, using browser automation to mimic human behaviors. It "scrolls" down a page to trigger infinite loading feeds, hovers over dropdown menus to reveal hidden links, and clicks buttons. These actions expose new URLs that are then fed back to the crawler for capture.17

This shift requires significantly more computing power. Rendering a page in Chrome takes orders of magnitude more CPU cycles than simply downloading a text file. This has forced the Archive to be more selective and targeted in its high-fidelity crawls, reserving the resource-intensive browser crawling for high-value dynamic sites while using lighter tools for the static web.17

The "Save Page Now" Revolution

Perhaps the most significant technological shift in recent years has been the democratization of the crawl. The Save Page Now feature allows any user to instantly trigger a crawl of a specific URL. This bypasses the scheduled, algorithmic crawls and inserts a high-priority job directly into the ingestion queue.

Powered by these browser-based technologies, Save Page Now has become a critical tool for journalists, researchers, and fact-checkers. In 2025, it is often the first line of defense against link rot, allowing users to create an immutable record of a tweet or news article seconds before it is deleted or altered.1

The Alexa Internet Connection

It is impossible to discuss the Archive's crawling history without mentioning Alexa Internet. Founded by Brewster Kahle in 1996 alongside the Archive, Alexa was a for-profit company that crawled the web to provide traffic analytics (the famous "Alexa Rank").

For nearly two decades, Alexa was the primary source of the Archive's data. Alexa would crawl the web for its own commercial purposes and then donate the crawl data to the Internet Archive after an embargo period. This symbiotic relationship provided the Archive with a massive, continuous stream of data without the need to run its own massive crawling infrastructure. However, with Amazon (which acquired Alexa in 1999) discontinuing the Alexa service in May 2022, the Archive has had to rely more heavily on its own crawling infrastructure and partners like Common Crawl.7

Part III: The Economics of Survival

Funding the Unprofitable

Running a top-tier global website usually requires the budget of a Google or a Meta. The Internet Archive manages to operate as one of the world's most visited websites on a budget that is shockingly modest. How does an organization with no ads, no subscription fees for readers, and no data mining revenue keep 200 petabytes of data online?

The Financial Ledger

According to financial filings (Form 990) and annual reports, the Internet Archive’s annual revenue hovers between $25 million and $30 million.7 In 2024, for example, the organization reported approximately $26.8 million in revenue against $23.5 million in expenses.25

The primary revenue driver is Contributions and Grants, which typically account for 60-70% of total income. This includes:

1. Micro-donations: The "Wikipedia model" of asking users for $5 or $10.
2. Major Grants: Funding from philanthropic organizations like the Mellon Foundation, the Kahle/Austin Foundation, and the Filecoin Foundation.25

The second major revenue stream is Program Services, specifically digitization and archiving services. The Archive is not just a library; it is a service provider.

• Archive-It: This subscription service allows institutions (libraries, universities, governments) to build their own curated web archives. Subscriptions start around $2,400/year for 100 GB of storage and scale up to $12,000/year for a terabyte. This service generates millions in revenue, effectively subsidizing the free Wayback Machine.27
• Digitization Services: The Archive operates digitization centers where it scans books and other media for partners. The "Scribe" book scanners—custom machines with V-shaped cradles and foot-pedal operated cameras—allow for non-destructive scanning of books. Partners pay per page (e.g., $0.15 per page for bound books) to have their collections digitized.28
• Vault Services: A newer offering, Vault provides digital preservation storage for a one-time fee (e.g., $1,000 per terabyte). This "endowment model" allows institutions to pay once for perpetual storage, betting that the cost of storage will decrease faster than the interest on the endowment.30

The Cost of a Petabyte

The expense side of the ledger is dominated by Salaries and Wages (roughly half the budget) and IT Infrastructure. However, the Archive’s "PetaBox economics" allow it to store data at a fraction of the cost of commercial cloud providers.

Consider the cost of storing 100 petabytes on Amazon S3. At standard rates (~$0.021 per GB per month), the storage alone would cost over $2.1 million per month. The Internet Archive’s entire annual operating budget—for staff, buildings, legal defense, and hardware—is less than what it would cost to store their data on AWS for a year.

By owning its hardware, using the PetaBox high-density architecture, avoiding air conditioning costs, and using open-source software, the Archive achieves a storage cost efficiency that is orders of magnitude better than commercial cloud rates.25

Part IV: The Legal Battlefield

When Preservation Meets Copyright

The Internet Archive’s mission is "Universal Access to All Knowledge." This mission is morally compelling but legally perilous. As the Archive expanded beyond simple web pages into books, music, and software, it moved from the relatively safe harbor of the "implied license" of the web into the heavily fortified territory of copyright law.

The National Emergency Library and Hachette v. Internet Archive

The tension exploded in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. With physical libraries closed, the Archive launched the "National Emergency Library," removing the waitlists on its digitized book collection. This move prompted four major publishers—Hachette, HarperCollins, Wiley, and Penguin Random House—to sue, alleging massive copyright infringement.31

The legal core of the Archive’s book program was Controlled Digital Lending (CDL). The theory argued that if a library owns a physical book, it should be allowed to scan that book and lend the digital copy to one person at a time, provided the physical book is taken out of circulation while the digital one is on loan. This "own-to-loan" ratio mimics the constraints of physical lending.33

However, in a crushing decision in March 2023, a federal judge rejected this defense, ruling that the Archive’s scanning and lending was not "fair use." The court found that the digital copies competed with the publishers' own commercial ebook markets. The Archive’s argument that its use was "transformative" (making lending more efficient) was rejected. In September 2024, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision, and by late 2024, the Archive announced it would not appeal to the Supreme Court.31

The settlement in the Hachette case was a significant blow. The Archive was forced to remove roughly 500,000 books from its lending program—specifically those for which a commercial ebook version exists. This "negotiated judgment" fundamentally altered the Archive's book strategy, forcing it to pivot back to older, out-of-print, and public domain works where commercial conflicts are less likely.31

The Great 78 Project and the Sony Settlement

While the book battle raged, a second front opened on the audio side. The Great 78 Project aimed to digitize 78rpm records from the early 20th century. These shellac discs are brittle, obsolete, and often deteriorating. The Archive argued that digitizing them was a preservation imperative.37

Major record labels, including Sony Music and Universal Music Group, disagreed. They sued in 2023, claiming the project functioned as an "illegal record store" that infringed on the copyrights of thousands of songs by artists like Frank Sinatra and Billie Holiday. They sought damages that could have reached over $600 million—an existential threat to the Archive.38

In September 2025, this lawsuit also reached a settlement. While the terms remain confidential, the resolution allowed the Archive to avoid a potentially bankruptcy-inducing trial. However, the immediate aftermath saw the removal of access to many copyrighted audio recordings, restricting them to researchers rather than the general public. This pattern—settlement followed by restriction—marks the new reality for the Internet Archive in 2025: a retreat from the "move fast and break things" approach to a more cautious, legally circumscribed preservation model.39

The Federal Depository Shield

In a major strategic win amidst these losses, the Internet Archive was designated as a Federal Depository Library (FDL) by the U.S. Senate in July 2025.7 This status is more than just a title; it legally empowers the Archive to collect, preserve, and provide access to U.S. government publications.

This designation provides a crucial layer of legal protection for at least a portion of the Archive’s collection. While it doesn't protect copyrighted music or commercial novels, it solidifies the Archive's role as an essential component of the nation's information infrastructure, making it politically and legally more difficult to shut down entirely.7

Part V: Future-Proofing the Past

Decentralization and the "End of Term"

The legal threats of 2020-2025 exposed a critical vulnerability: centralization. If a court order or a catastrophic fire were to hit the Funston Avenue headquarters, the primary copy of the web’s history could be lost. The Archive’s strategy for the next decade is to decentralize survival.

The Decentralized Web (DWeb)

The Archive is a primary driver behind the DWeb movement, which seeks to build a web that is distributed rather than centralized. The goal is to store the Archive’s data across a global network of peers, making it impossible for any single entity—be it a government, a corporation, or a natural disaster—to take it offline.5

Technologically, this involves integrating with protocols like IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) and Filecoin.

• IPFS: Allows content to be addressed by its cryptographic hash (what it is) rather than its location (where it is). If the Archive’s server is blocked, a user can retrieve the same WARC file from any other node in the network that holds a copy.5
• Filecoin: Provides an incentive layer for storage. In 2025, the Archive began uploading critical collections, such as the "End of Term" government web archives, to the Filecoin network for cold storage. This acts as a decentralized, immutable backup that exists outside the Archive’s direct physical control.45

The 2025 "End of Term" Crawl

Every four years, the Archive leads a massive effort to crawl (dot)gov and (dot)mil websites before a presidential transition. The 2024/2025 crawl was the largest in history, capturing over 500 terabytes of government data.45 This project highlights the Archive's role as a watchdog of history, ensuring that climate data, census reports, and policy documents don't vanish when a new administration takes office.

Generative AI and Fair Use

I emailed Brewser Kahle regarding 2025 and generative AI, and here is his quote:

\

Conclusion: The Long Now

As we move deeper into the 21st century, the Internet Archive stands as a paradox. It is a technological behemoth, operating at a scale that rivals Silicon Valley giants, yet it is housed in a church and run by librarians. It is a fragile institution, battered by lawsuits and budget constraints, yet it is also the most robust memory bank humanity has ever built.

The events of 2025—the "trillionth page" milestone, the painful legal settlements, and the pivot toward decentralized storage—mark a maturing of the organization. It is no longer the "wild west" of the early web. It is a battered but resilient institution, adapting its machinery and its mission to survive in a world that is increasingly hostile to the concept of free, universal access. And the rising popularity of generative AI adds yet another unpredictable dimension to the future survival of the public domain archive.

Inside the PetaBox, the drives continue to spin. The heat they generate warms the building, keeping the fog of the Richmond District at bay. And somewhere on those platters, amidst the trillions of zeros and ones, lies the only proof that the digital world of yesterday ever existed at all. The machine remembers, so that we don't have to.

References

1. Wayback Machine - Wikipedia, accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayback_Machine

2. Looking back on “Preserving the Internet” from 1996 | Internet Archive Blogs, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2025/09/02/looking-back-on-preserving-the-internet-from-1996/

3. Petabox - Internet Archive, accessed January 8, 2026, https://archive.org/web/petabox.php

4. PetaBox - Wikipedia, accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PetaBox

5. IPFS: Building blocks for a better web | IPFS, accessed January 8, 2026, https://ipfs.tech/

6. internetarchive/dweb-archive - GitHub, accessed January 8, 2026, https://github.com/internetarchive/dweb-archive

7. Internet Archive - Wikipedia, accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Archive

8. Making Web Memories with the PetaBox - eWeek, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.eweek.com/storage/making-web-memories-with-the-petabox/

9. PetaBox - Internet Archive Unoffical Wiki, accessed January 8, 2026, https://internetarchive.archiveteam.org/index.php/PetaBox

10. The Fourth Generation Petabox | Internet Archive Blogs, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2010/07/27/the-fourth-generation-petabox/

11. Internet Archive Hits One Trillion Web Pages - Hackaday, accessed January 8, 2026, https://hackaday.com/2025/11/18/internet-archive-hits-one-trillion-web-pages/

12. The Internet Archive's Wayback Machine gets a new data center - Computerworld, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.computerworld.com/article/1562759/the-internet-archive-s-wayback-machine-gets-a-new-data-center.html

13. Internet Archive to Live in Sun Blackbox - Data Center Knowledge, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/business/internet-archive-to-live-in-sun-blackbox

14. Inside the Internet Archive: A Meat World Tour | Root Simple, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.rootsimple.com/2023/08/inside-the-internet-archive-a-meat-world-tour/

15. Internet Archive Preserves Data from World Wide Web - Richmond Review/Sunset Beacon, accessed January 8, 2026, https://richmondsunsetnews.com/2017/03/11/internet-archive-preserves-data-from-world-wide-web/

16. Heritrix - Wikipedia, accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritrix

17. Archive-It Crawling Technology, accessed January 8, 2026, https://support.archive-it.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001081186-Archive-It-Crawling-Technology

18. WARCreate: Create Wayback-Consumable WARC Files From Any Webpage - ODU Digital Commons, accessed January 8, 2026, https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1154&context=computerscience_fac_pubs

19. The WARC Format - IIPC Community Resources, accessed January 8, 2026, https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/

20. What is heritrix? - Hall: AI, accessed January 8, 2026, https://usehall.com/agents/heritrix-bot

21. Archiving Websites Containing Streaming Media, accessed January 8, 2026, https://library.imaging.org/admin/apis/public/api/ist/website/downloadArticle/archiving/14/1/art00004

22. March | 2025 | Internet Archive Blogs, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2025/03/

23. Alexa Crawls - Internet Archive, accessed January 8, 2026, https://archive.org/details/alexacrawls

24. Alexa Internet - Wikipedia, accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexa_Internet

25. Internet Archive - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica, accessed January 8, 2026, https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/943242767

26. Update on the 2024/2025 End of Term Web Archive - Ben Werdmuller, accessed January 8, 2026, https://werd.io/update-on-the-20242025-end-of-term-web-archive/

27. Archive-It | History as Code, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.historyascode.com/tools-data/archive-it/

28. Pricing - Internet Archive Digitization Services, accessed January 8, 2026, https://digitization.archive.org/pricing/

29. The random Bay Area warehouse that houses one of humanity's greatest archives - SFGATE, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/bay-area-warehouse-internet-archive-19858332.php

30. Vault Pricing Model - Vault Support, accessed January 8, 2026, https://vault-webservices.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/22896482572180-Vault-Pricing-Model

31. Hachette v. Internet Archive - Wikipedia, accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hachette_v._Internet_Archive

32. Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive | Copyright Cases, accessed January 8, 2026, https://copyrightalliance.org/copyright-cases/hachette-book-group-internet-archive/

33. Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, No. 23-1260 (2d Cir. 2024) - Justia Law, accessed January 8, 2026, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-1260/23-1260-2024-09-04.html

34. Hachette Book Group v. Internet Archive and the Future of Controlled Digital Lending, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.library.upenn.edu/news/hachette-v-internet-archive

35. Internet Archive's Open Library and Copyright Law: The Final Chapter, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.lutzker.com/ip_bit_pieces/internet-archives-open-library-and-copyright-law-the-final-chapter/

36. What the Hachette v. Internet Archive Decision Means for Our Library, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2023/08/17/what-the-hachette-v-internet-archive-decision-means-for-our-library/

37. Labels settle copyright lawsuit against Internet Archive over streaming of vintage vinyl records - Music Business Worldwide, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/labels-settle-copyright-lawsuit-against-internet-archive-over-streaming-of-vintage-vinyl-records/

38. Internet Archive Settles $621 Million Lawsuit with Major Labels Over Vinyl Preservation Project - Consequence.net, accessed January 8, 2026, https://consequence.net/2025/09/internet-archive-labels-settle-copyright-lawsuit/

39. An Update on the Great 78s Lawsuit | Internet Archive Blogs, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2025/09/15/an-update-on-the-great-78s-lawsuit/

40. Music Publishers, Internet Archive Settle Lawsuit Over Old Recordings - GigaLaw, accessed January 8, 2026, https://giga.law/daily-news/2025/9/15/music-publishers-internet-archive-settle-lawsuit-over-old-recordings

41. Internet Archive Settles Copyright Suit with Sony, Universal Over Vintage Records, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.webpronews.com/internet-archive-settles-copyright-suit-with-sony-universal-over-vintage-records/

42. July | 2025 - Internet Archive Blogs, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2025/07/

43. Decentralized Web FAQ - Internet Archive Blogs, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2018/07/21/decentralized-web-faq/

44. Decentralized Web Server: Possible Approach with Cost and Performance Estimates, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2016/06/23/decentalized-web-server-possible-approach-with-cost-and-performance-estimates/

45. Update on the 2024/2025 End of Term Web Archive | Internet …, accessed January 8, 2026, https://blog.archive.org/2025/02/06/update-on-the-2024-2025-end-of-term-web-archive/

46. Progress update from The End of Term Web Archive: 100 million webpages collected, over 500 TB of data : r/DataHoarder - Reddit, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/1ijkdjl/progress_update_from_the_end_of_term_web_archive/

    \n

\