BlockDAG contrasts Ethereum by offering native EVM scalability at 1400 TPS without relying on Layer 2 rollups. Ethereum currently processes roughly 15 to 30 transactionsBlockDAG contrasts Ethereum by offering native EVM scalability at 1400 TPS without relying on Layer 2 rollups. Ethereum currently processes roughly 15 to 30 transactions

Ethereum dominates the EVM, BlockDAG targets its bottleneck with 1,400 TPS before January 26

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

BlockDAG contrasts Ethereum by offering native EVM scalability at 1400 TPS without relying on Layer 2 rollups.

Summary
  • Ethereum relies on Layer-2 rollups due to base-layer limits while BlockDAG offers 1,400 TPS natively at Layer 1.
  • BlockDAG’s structure enables parallel processing, boosting EVM throughput without rollup dependencies.
  • New blockchain designs like BlockDAG expand EVM options without displacing Ethereum’s core role.

Ethereum currently processes roughly 15 to 30 transactions per second at the base layer, with gas fees frequently spiking above $20 during peak demand and validator activity distributed across more than 900,000 nodes. Its market dominance remains clear, supported by trillions of dollars in cumulative on-chain value settled since launch.

Ethereum dominates the EVM, BlockDAG targets its bottleneck with 1,400 TPS before January 26 - 2

However, this performance ceiling has pushed most EVM activity toward Layer-2 rollups. Against this backdrop, BlockDAG enters the EVM ecosystem with a stated throughput of 1,400 transactions per second at Layer 1, reframing scalability as a native execution feature rather than an external add-on. The contrast between Ethereum and BlockDAG centers on how EVM performance is delivered and where execution bottlenecks are resolved.

Ethereum’s EVM performance ceiling

Ethereum remains the reference standard for EVM-based development, hosting thousands of decentralized applications, stablecoins, and DeFi protocols. Its execution environment is trusted, battle-tested, and supported by the largest developer community in the industry. 

However, Ethereum’s base-layer throughput has not materially increased despite upgrades like the Merge and subsequent optimizations. The network continues to rely on Layer-2 solutions such as Optimism, Arbitrum, and zk-rollups to scale transaction volume. 

This layered approach improves capacity but introduces fragmentation. Liquidity becomes distributed across multiple execution environments, bridging adds complexity, and finality depends on settlement back to the base chain. While Ethereum prioritizes decentralization and security, its EVM performance ceiling at Layer 1 remains a structural constraint. As a result, developers building high-frequency or compute-heavy applications must design around congestion, fee volatility, and delayed settlement. 

BlockDAG’s layer-1 EVM throughput model

BlockDAG positions itself within the same EVM universe but challenges the assumption that execution scalability must sit above the base layer. By using a Directed Acyclic Graph structure rather than a strictly linear block sequence, BlockDAG allows multiple blocks to be processed and validated in parallel. This architecture underpins its claim of supporting up to 1,400 transactions per second at Layer 1 while maintaining EVM compatibility. 

For developers, this means smart contracts can run in a familiar environment without relying on rollups or off-chain execution layers. Transaction ordering is handled through graph-based consensus, reducing bottlenecks during peak demand. Instead of offloading congestion to secondary networks, BlockDAG integrates throughput directly into its core execution design. This shifts scalability from an external dependency to a native protocol feature, altering how EVM workloads are deployed and managed. 

EVM compatibility without layer-2 dependency

Ethereum’s approach has led to a modular ecosystem where execution, data availability, and settlement are increasingly separated. While this model supports long-term scaling goals, it places additional burdens on developers and users. Cross-rollup liquidity, bridging risks, and varying security assumptions complicate application design. BlockDAG’s strategy contrasts by keeping execution consolidated at Layer 1 while preserving EVM tooling, wallets, and developer workflows.

This consolidation has implications for latency and cost predictability. With higher base-layer throughput, transaction fees are less sensitive to short-term spikes in activity. Applications that require consistent execution speed, such as gaming, real-time financial instruments, or enterprise automation, benefit from reduced reliance on layered infrastructure. In this context, BlockDAG does not replace Ethereum’s ecosystem but offers an alternative execution environment for EVM workloads that prioritize speed at the protocol level.

Network economics and market positioning

Ethereum’s economic model is closely tied to its scarcity mechanics and fee burn introduced through EIP-1559. While this supports long-term value accrual, it does not directly address execution capacity. High demand still translates into congestion, and users effectively bid for block space. BlockDAG approaches network economics from a different angle by expanding available throughput, which increases block space supply rather than rationing it through higher fees.

Ethereum dominates the EVM, BlockDAG targets its bottleneck with 1,400 TPS before January 26 - 3

Market interest in this model is reflected in BlockDAG’s ongoing presale. The project has raised over $442 million to date, with the current batch priced at $0.003. The presale is officially scheduled to end on 26th January, marking a transition from capital formation to broader network deployment. These figures signal investor demand for Layer-1 solutions that maintain EVM compatibility while addressing performance limits directly.

Evolution rather than replacement

The comparison between Ethereum and BlockDAG is not framed as a zero-sum outcome. Ethereum continues to serve as the settlement and liquidity anchor for much of the crypto economy. Its conservative approach prioritizes security and decentralization over aggressive throughput expansion. BlockDAG, by contrast, targets execution efficiency within the same EVM framework, offering developers a faster native alternative when Layer-2 complexity becomes a constraint.

This dynamic mirrors earlier shifts in blockchain design where new architectures complemented rather than displaced incumbents. By remaining EVM-compatible, BlockDAG aligns itself with existing tooling and developer knowledge while experimenting with different consensus and execution trade-offs. The result is a broader EVM landscape where performance characteristics vary by design rather than by auxiliary layers.

Final thoughts

Ethereum’s execution model set the standard for smart contract platforms, but its base-layer throughput remains limited, pushing scalability concerns into Layer-2 networks. BlockDAG reframes this challenge by integrating higher transaction capacity directly into Layer 1 while staying within the EVM ecosystem. 

With a claimed 1,400 TPS, significant presale traction exceeding $442 million, and a $0.003 current batch price ahead of its 26th January presale conclusion, BlockDAG positions itself as an execution-focused evolution rather than a replacement. As EVM workloads continue to grow, the contrast highlights a broader shift where speed becomes a first-layer design choice rather than an external dependency.

To learn more about BlockDAG, visit the website, Telegram, Discord or purchase.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Market Opportunity
Solayer Logo
Solayer Price(LAYER)
$0.1671
$0.1671$0.1671
+0.78%
USD
Solayer (LAYER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
The whale "pension-usdt.eth" has reduced its ETH long positions by 10,000 coins, and its futures account has made a profit of $4.18 million in the past day.

The whale "pension-usdt.eth" has reduced its ETH long positions by 10,000 coins, and its futures account has made a profit of $4.18 million in the past day.

PANews reported on January 14th that, according to Hyperbot data monitoring, the whale "pension-usdt.eth" reduced its ETH long positions by 10,000 ETH in the past
Share
PANews2026/01/14 13:45
Senator Warren Tells OCC to Stop World Liberty Bank Review Amid Trump Ties

Senator Warren Tells OCC to Stop World Liberty Bank Review Amid Trump Ties

The post Senator Warren Tells OCC to Stop World Liberty Bank Review Amid Trump Ties appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has called
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 12:55