Speed has become the defining battleground for EVM-compatible blockchains, but how that speed is achieved matters more than ever. As […] The post 1,400 TPS: WhySpeed has become the defining battleground for EVM-compatible blockchains, but how that speed is achieved matters more than ever. As […] The post 1,400 TPS: Why

1,400 TPS: Why BlockDAG Is Forcing a Rethink of Avalanche’s Scaling Model

2026/01/14 08:00

Speed has become the defining battleground for EVM-compatible blockchains, but how that speed is achieved matters more than ever. As networks race to advertise higher throughput, developers and investors are starting to look past headline TPS numbers and question the architecture underneath.

Some chains pursue scale through modular expansion, while others aim to bake performance directly into the base layer. This distinction is no longer theoretical; it directly impacts composability, liquidity, and long-term usability.

In the fast-EVM race, the contrast between Avalanche’s subnet model and BlockDAG’s unified DAG-based execution highlights two very different philosophies of scaling, with real consequences for adoption and value creation.

Avalanche’s Modular Scaling Model Explained

Avalanche has long marketed itself as a leader in the fast EVM chains category, leveraging subnets and parallel processing to scale execution. Its architecture allows developers to launch customized blockchain environments called subnets, each capable of running its own virtual machine, consensus mechanism, and execution logic. This modularity is what Avalanche uses to claim high throughput, with the core Avalanche network boasting thousands of transactions per second.

However, Avalanche’s approach is far from simple. The fragmentation introduced by subnets, while powerful in theory, can create barriers to seamless liquidity and developer experience. Each subnet operates in isolation unless explicitly bridged, which complicates shared state across applications.

Although Avalanche touts TPS figures well above average, many of these numbers represent isolated subnet performance rather than unified throughput across the network. As a result, Avalanche’s modular design might appear fast, but it raises questions about composability, decentralization, and the real-world developer benefits of such a structure.

While Avalanche has found success in DeFi partnerships and gaming applications, the reliance on vertical scaling through subnets risks long-term coherence. Users and builders often have to deal with friction that comes from managing fragmented execution environments. This raises an essential question: Does modular speed actually solve throughput, or does it shift complexity downstream?

BlockDAG’s Unified EVM Throughput: Fast by Architecture, Not Fragmentation

BlockDAG approaches the problem from the opposite direction. Rather than scaling through isolated subnets, it delivers extremely high EVM throughput directly at the base layer. The architecture uses a DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) structure that processes transactions asynchronously and in parallel, but crucially, without breaking the global state. This allows BlockDAG to maintain high composability, real-time finality, and top-tier performance without needing modular rollouts or bridging layers.

In terms of throughput, BlockDAG claims to surpass 1,400 transactions per second at Layer 1, all while supporting full EVM compatibility. This makes it a rare example of a high-speed EVM chain that doesn’t compromise on composability or decentralization. It also removes the complexity developers face when deploying across fragmented subnets or Layer 2s. Everything is handled within the base protocol, offering the kind of unified execution environment Ethereum can only dream of achieving with its rollup-centric roadmap.

BlockDAG is currently in presale and has already raised over $442 million. The current batch price is set at $0.003, with the presale officially ending on January 26th. That level of fundraising places BlockDAG among the top-performing presales in the current cycle, not just for hype, but because of the technical clarity it brings to Layer 1 scaling.

Instead of marketing modularity as a feature, BlockDAG builds fast execution into the core protocol. Its DAG-based consensus combined with EVM compatibility means developers can deploy standard Solidity contracts while benefiting from speeds that rival Layer 2 networks but without the fragmentation. This puts BlockDAG in a league of its own when it comes to combining throughput with usability.

Modular Speed vs Unified Throughput: What’s the Real Advantage?

The real debate isn’t just about raw speed; it’s about how that speed is delivered. Avalanche relies on a modular architecture, where performance depends on deploying and managing multiple subnets. This may work for enterprise use cases, but it introduces complexity and friction that can hamper adoption. Fast EVM chains shouldn’t require additional layers of abstraction to perform well.

BlockDAG, on the other hand, makes speed an inherent property of the base chain. There’s no need for subnets, Layer 2s, or rollups. Developers get Ethereum compatibility out of the box with speeds that surpass what most modular solutions offer. This eliminates fragmentation, reduces latency, and makes liquidity more fluid across the ecosystem.

BlockDAG’s model also benefits validators and miners through its dual consensus mechanism, which integrates Proof of Work for security and a DAG structure for concurrency. This hybrid model ensures that scaling doesn’t compromise decentralization, a concern many Layer 1s struggle with when pursuing high throughput.

As the Ethereum ecosystem pushes toward a rollup-centric roadmap with fragmented execution, the simplicity of a unified high-throughput base layer is becoming more attractive. BlockDAG answers that demand by offering a single, fast, and composable platform for DeFi, gaming, and decentralized apps.

BlockDAG’s Base-Layer Speed Redefines Fast EVM Chains

Avalanche may have a head start in the fast EVM chains race, but its modular approach introduces challenges that cannot be ignored. Subnets offer theoretical throughput but sacrifice the ease of shared liquidity and unified execution. As developers weigh the tradeoffs, the real question becomes: is more architecture the answer or less?

BlockDAG flips the script by making speed and composability native to the base layer. With a current batch price of $0.003 and over $442 million raised in presale, BlockDAG is positioning itself not just as another Ethereum alternative but as a foundational shift in how fast EVM chains can function without fragmentation. The presale ends on January 26th, and with it, a chance to enter a chain that could redefine throughput at Layer 1.

For those watching the fast EVM space, BlockDAG is not just competing, it’s leading from the core.

Presale: https://purchase.blockdag.network

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu 


This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before engaging in any cryptocurrency-related actions. Coindoo will not be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damages or losses resulting from the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

The post 1,400 TPS: Why BlockDAG Is Forcing a Rethink of Avalanche’s Scaling Model  appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.002511
$0.002511$0.002511
+0.39%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.