Bad actors are using Ethereum smart contracts to deploy malware: ReversingLabs

2025/09/04 16:22

Bad actors have started using Ethereum smart contracts to deploy malicious software and code, and are therefore able to bypass traditional security scans using this novel technique.

Summary
  • The npm packages use Ethereum smart contracts to hide malicious payloads.
  • Researchers believe it is part of a larger campaign that primarily operates through GitHub.

Researchers at ReversingLabs have flagged a new open-source malware that has been deployed across the Node Package Manager (NPM) repository, where it uses obfuscated scripts and smart contracts to fetch command-and-control server URLs that deliver malicious payloads onto compromised systems.

The NPM package repository is a widely used platform for distributing JavaScript libraries and tools. Over the past few years, it has increasingly become a target for software supply chain attacks as hackers are able to trick developers into integrating malicious dependencies into their projects via this method.

According to ReversingLabs, a new strain of open-source malware was found hidden in two npm packages named colortoolsv2 and mimelib2. The packages were found to be using Ethereum smart contracts to remotely load malicious commands and install downloader malware on infected systems.

Both the packages first surfaced in July and function as simple downloaders at first glance. However, instead of directly hosting malicious links, those packages would query the blockchain to fetch URLs when installed.

Subsequently, the retrieved URLs would connect to attacker-controlled command-and-control servers, which then delivered a second-stage payload. Typically, these malicious payloads are designed to exfiltrate sensitive data, install remote access tools, or serve as entry points for a larger attack.

Researchers at ReversingLabs claimed the packages were published as part of a broader campaign targeting open-source ecosystems like npm and GitHub, where attackers relied on social engineering and deceptive project setups to target developers into integrating the malicious code into real-world applications. 

Infrastructure-level attacks are evolving

Threat actors have long employed infrastructure-level tactics that are harder to detect. A separate report from ReversingLabs published earlier this year found a trojanized npm package that scanned systems for installed wallets like Atomic and Exodus and silently redirected transactions to attacker-controlled addresses.

Meanwhile, the infamous North Korean hacking group Lazarus was observed deploying its own malicious npm packages earlier this year.

Another incident flagged by security firm Slowmist in 2024 revealed a scam using a malicious Ethereum remote procedure call (RPC) function to deceive users of the imToken wallet.

However, unlike the previous attack vectors, the new campaign discovered by ReversingLabs separates itself by using “ethereum smart contracts to host the URLs where malicious commands are located,” the report noted. 

ReversingLabs urged developers to exercise caution when interacting with npm libraries and third-party packages.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin

Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin

XRP CTO defends energy efficiency over Litecoin’s PoW consensus model. Litecoin’s controversial social media post intensifies crypto rivalry with XRP. XRP dominates institutional adoption, leaving Litecoin behind in market support. The rivalry between the XRP and Litecoin communities has reached a new level of intensity, with Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, stepping into the debate. In a recent response to claims from the Litecoin camp, Schwartz criticized Litecoin’s energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) model, calling it a flaw rather than a feature. His remarks reignited the ongoing discussion about energy consumption in blockchain technology and its long-term impact. The value of the PoW mechanism in Litecoin has long been argued in defence by Litecoin community member Jonny Litecoin. According to them, similarly to Bitcoin, Litecoin needs to be mined in real life, creating additional value. Jonny Litecoin directed his aim at XRP, arguing that it was free and mined out of thin air by a company in the first place, not by mining or staking. He also criticized Ripple because it was allotting 1 billion XRP tokens to its escrow account every month, questioned the value of XRP, and called it centralized. Two products are equivalent except that one takes much more energy to make than the other. Which one do you think is the most likely to grow in popularity over time? — David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) September 3, 2025 Also Read: BitMine Acquires $64.7M in ETH, Pushing Toward 5% of Total Ethereum Supply Contrastingly, David Schwartz opined that the future of blockchain technology would depend on its energy efficiency. He noted that when two assets are essentially similar but one of them uses a lot more energy, the more efficient one will tend to become the choice in the long term. Since the cost of energy is increasing worldwide, Schwartz highlighted that blockchain projects with a more efficiency-driven scope would be in a better place to grow sustainably. Litecoin’s Controversial Social Media Jabs at XRP Litecoin recently escalated tensions further by taking a direct jab at XRP via a tweet from its official account. The tweet compared XRP whales to the heartbeat of a blue whale, saying, “You can hear a blue whale’s heartbeat from over two miles away, which is the complete opposite of XRP whales since they’re all dead on the inside.” The tweet was met with a mix of reactions—some users found it humorous, while others dismissed it as ineffective. Decentralization and quick transactions have been a long-running presence in the Litecoin community and have been used in contrast to the XRP use case of cross-border payments. This was one in a series of provocative statements by the Litecoin community; a similar tweet had been made comparing the XRP tokens with the scent of rotten eggs, urine, and almonds. These insults underline the increasing conflict between the two cryptocurrencies and their respective fan bases. XRP’s Institutional Advantage Despite the ongoing social media feud, XRP continues to lead in institutional adoption. XRP has seen significant support, with over a dozen spot ETF filings and nearly $1.4 billion in investment inflows. In comparison, Litecoin has attracted only $4.71 million. With a market cap more than 30 times that of Litecoin, XRP is positioned to lead the race for future dominance, especially as energy efficiency and institutional backing become key factors in the cryptocurrency landscape. Also Read: Ripple Expands RLUSD Stablecoin in Africa, Offering Regulated Digital Dollar for Institutional Use The post Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/04 18:09
Share