China’s AI playbook is nothing like America’s and that might be the whole point

America is throwing billions of dollars and burning through massive energy reserves in an arms race to dominate artificial intelligence before China gets there first.

The goal for Washington is to build artificial general intelligence (AGI) powerful enough to outthink humans, and the Trump administration has said time and time again that AI will completely flip the global order as we inevitably descend into a dystopia.

But China is not chasing that fantasy.

You see, President Xi Jinping has ordered China’s tech companies like DeepSeek to stay grounded and build tools that work now. Xi wants software that helps farmers plant rice better and helps cops respond faster. Beijing’s endgame is intelligent systems that make life more efficient and can be exported everywhere, according to Xi.

China funds practical AI while the U.S. pours cash into AGI

Xi hasn’t said much about AGI in years. Instead, he wants tech companies in China to develop “application-oriented” systems. Local government reports show Chinese language models similar to ChatGPT are grading school exams, improving weather accuracy, dispatching emergency teams, and giving farmers advice on crop rotation.

At Tsinghua University in Beijing, doctors are now working alongside virtual AI colleagues that provide up-to-date medical insights. Robots are running textile checks and automotive production lines in “dark factories” without any human staff.

The U.S. is building plenty of real-world tools too. Google’s Pixel phones translate speech on the spot. American consultants are using AI to write reports and decks. Other U.S. firms are working on AI for drug discovery and logistics. But Washington doesn’t manage this directly. In China, the state is deeply involved.

In January, Beijing announced an $8.4 billion AI fund for startups. Since then, provinces, banks, and cities have created their own AI support programs under the national “AI+” campaign. On Tuesday, the cabinet outlined broader goals: use AI in science labs, industry, and education to support economic development through 2030.

Unlike Silicon Valley, China is pushing open-source AI. Their models are free to download and modify, cutting down costs and helping local companies build faster. This tactic has started to ripple into the West, with some U.S. developers now also turning to open models.

U.S. chases AGI while China focuses on the tools it already has

American companies OpenAI, Meta, and Google are still betting on AGI, believing that these machines could open up entire new sectors and give Washington massive advantages when another war breaks out.

And the Wall Street Journal predicts artificial superintelligence could emerge by 2027, so to get there, companies are naturally rushing to stockpile chips, hire talent, and build massive data centers. A congressional committee has even proposed a full-scale “Manhattan Project” for AGI, saying its purpose is to guarantee U.S. leadership in the field.

But OpenAI’s recent release of GPT-5, which was promised to be a big step toward AGI, fell flat last month after CEO Sam Altman admitted publicly that the launch was messy and even warned of a possible AI investment bubble.

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, and tech analyst Selina Xu wrote in The New York Times, “In being solely fixated on this objective, our nation risks falling behind China, which is far less concerned with creating AI powerful enough to surpass humans and much more focused on using the technology we have now.”

In Xiong’an, a new city built south of Beijing, China is already embedding AI in everything. In February, local officials deployed an agricultural AI tool built by DeepSeek to help farmers choose crops, manage pests, and handle planting schedules. The city’s weather team uses it to improve forecasts. Police departments use it to analyze case data and decide how to react.

Xiong’an’s 12345 hotline, a government help center that handles hundreds of thousands of calls daily, uses DeepSeek to sort and route messages. These aren’t pilot programs. They’re operational.

China is also spending big on data centers. But unlike the sprawling U.S. facilities designed for AGI training, the ones in China are smaller and designed to support apps that already exist. U.S. restrictions on high-end chips are making it harder for China to train massive models. So they’re focusing on deployment instead.

Still, China isn’t ignoring AGI completely. Alibaba and DeepSeek both say they have AGI goals. Analysts think Xi may be holding back on pushing AGI aggressively … at least for now.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It’s free.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/chinas-ai-playbook-nothing-like-americas/

Aviso legal: Los artículos republicados en este sitio provienen de plataformas públicas y se ofrecen únicamente con fines informativos. No reflejan necesariamente la opinión de MEXC. Todos los derechos pertenecen a los autores originales. Si consideras que algún contenido infringe derechos de terceros, comunícate con service@support.mexc.com para solicitar su eliminación. MEXC no garantiza la exactitud, la integridad ni la actualidad del contenido y no se responsabiliza por acciones tomadas en función de la información proporcionada. El contenido no constituye asesoría financiera, legal ni profesional, ni debe interpretarse como recomendación o respaldo por parte de MEXC.
Compartir perspectivas

También te puede interesar

Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin

Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin

XRP CTO defends energy efficiency over Litecoin’s PoW consensus model. Litecoin’s controversial social media post intensifies crypto rivalry with XRP. XRP dominates institutional adoption, leaving Litecoin behind in market support. The rivalry between the XRP and Litecoin communities has reached a new level of intensity, with Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, stepping into the debate. In a recent response to claims from the Litecoin camp, Schwartz criticized Litecoin’s energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) model, calling it a flaw rather than a feature. His remarks reignited the ongoing discussion about energy consumption in blockchain technology and its long-term impact. The value of the PoW mechanism in Litecoin has long been argued in defence by Litecoin community member Jonny Litecoin. According to them, similarly to Bitcoin, Litecoin needs to be mined in real life, creating additional value. Jonny Litecoin directed his aim at XRP, arguing that it was free and mined out of thin air by a company in the first place, not by mining or staking. He also criticized Ripple because it was allotting 1 billion XRP tokens to its escrow account every month, questioned the value of XRP, and called it centralized. Two products are equivalent except that one takes much more energy to make than the other. Which one do you think is the most likely to grow in popularity over time? — David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) September 3, 2025 Also Read: BitMine Acquires $64.7M in ETH, Pushing Toward 5% of Total Ethereum Supply Contrastingly, David Schwartz opined that the future of blockchain technology would depend on its energy efficiency. He noted that when two assets are essentially similar but one of them uses a lot more energy, the more efficient one will tend to become the choice in the long term. Since the cost of energy is increasing worldwide, Schwartz highlighted that blockchain projects with a more efficiency-driven scope would be in a better place to grow sustainably. Litecoin’s Controversial Social Media Jabs at XRP Litecoin recently escalated tensions further by taking a direct jab at XRP via a tweet from its official account. The tweet compared XRP whales to the heartbeat of a blue whale, saying, “You can hear a blue whale’s heartbeat from over two miles away, which is the complete opposite of XRP whales since they’re all dead on the inside.” The tweet was met with a mix of reactions—some users found it humorous, while others dismissed it as ineffective. Decentralization and quick transactions have been a long-running presence in the Litecoin community and have been used in contrast to the XRP use case of cross-border payments. This was one in a series of provocative statements by the Litecoin community; a similar tweet had been made comparing the XRP tokens with the scent of rotten eggs, urine, and almonds. These insults underline the increasing conflict between the two cryptocurrencies and their respective fan bases. XRP’s Institutional Advantage Despite the ongoing social media feud, XRP continues to lead in institutional adoption. XRP has seen significant support, with over a dozen spot ETF filings and nearly $1.4 billion in investment inflows. In comparison, Litecoin has attracted only $4.71 million. With a market cap more than 30 times that of Litecoin, XRP is positioned to lead the race for future dominance, especially as energy efficiency and institutional backing become key factors in the cryptocurrency landscape. Also Read: Ripple Expands RLUSD Stablecoin in Africa, Offering Regulated Digital Dollar for Institutional Use The post Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin appeared first on 36Crypto.
Compartir
Coinstats2025/09/04 18:09
Compartir