TLDR Disney stock dropped 1.9% over the week, closing at $113.76 down from $115.96 high ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s show after controversial remarks, sparking immediate market reaction Streaming segment turned profitable with ESPN partnerships driving growth Traditional TV division continues facing subscriber decline challenges Analysts maintain positive outlook with $5.85 EPS guidance for full year [...] The post Disney (DIS) Stock Takes Hit as Kimmel Controversy Rocks ABC Network appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Disney stock dropped 1.9% over the week, closing at $113.76 down from $115.96 high ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s show after controversial remarks, sparking immediate market reaction Streaming segment turned profitable with ESPN partnerships driving growth Traditional TV division continues facing subscriber decline challenges Analysts maintain positive outlook with $5.85 EPS guidance for full year [...] The post Disney (DIS) Stock Takes Hit as Kimmel Controversy Rocks ABC Network appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disney (DIS) Stock Takes Hit as Kimmel Controversy Rocks ABC Network

2025/09/21 22:09

TLDR

  • Disney stock dropped 1.9% over the week, closing at $113.76 down from $115.96 high
  • ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s show after controversial remarks, sparking immediate market reaction
  • Streaming segment turned profitable with ESPN partnerships driving growth
  • Traditional TV division continues facing subscriber decline challenges
  • Analysts maintain positive outlook with $5.85 EPS guidance for full year

Disney shares experienced a bumpy ride this week, closing at $113.76 after falling from a weekly high of $115.96. The 1.9% decline came as the entertainment giant navigated both operational challenges and media-related controversies.

The Walt Disney Company (DIS)The Walt Disney Company (DIS)

Trading volume peaked at nearly 8.9 million shares during Friday’s session. The stock moved within a $111.93 to $114.22 range over the past two days.

Disney’s market cap sits at $204.5 billion with a trailing P/E ratio of 18.17. This valuation aligns with historical media sector benchmarks.

The company had been struggling to break through resistance levels around $117-$118 throughout September. Previous gains earlier in the month proved short-lived as selling pressure emerged.

Streaming Success Meets Broadcasting Turbulence

Disney’s direct-to-consumer streaming business recently turned profitable, marking a key milestone. ESPN’s digital transformation and new partnership deals have generated analyst optimism about future revenue streams.

However, the traditional television division continues facing headwinds. Linear TV subscriber declines and Disney+ pricing concerns remain investor worries.

The company’s latest quarterly results showed mixed signals across different segments. While streaming profits improved, entertainment division challenges persisted.

ABC’s decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel’s show created immediate market volatility. The move followed politically charged on-air comments that sparked public debate.

Celebrity Mark Ruffalo publicly criticized the suspension decision on social media. His comments suggested the cancellation could hurt Disney’s stock performance further.

Initial reports indicated a 7% stock drop following the ABC announcement. However, the actual closing decline proved less severe at around 2% for the trading session.

Analyst Confidence Remains Strong

Despite recent challenges, no Wall Street analysts issued sell ratings on Disney shares. The research community maintains a generally constructive view on the company’s long-term prospects.

Theme park investments have started generating improved returns according to recent financial data. The parks and experiences division continues showing steady operating profit growth.

Management reaffirmed full-year earnings guidance of $5.85 per share. This target assumes double-digit gains in entertainment and sports segments.

Disney’s international expansion plans include additional theme park developments. The company also plans deeper partnerships with NFL and WWE for ESPN content.

Free cash flow remains strong despite moderate debt levels across the business. This financial position supports continued share buyback programs and dividend payments.

The current dividend yield stands near 0.88% for income-focused investors. Disney’s balance sheet provides flexibility for strategic investments and shareholder returns.

Recent streaming price increases have created some subscriber churn concerns. Management continues balancing revenue growth with customer retention strategies.

ESPN’s digital pivot represents a major strategic shift for the sports broadcasting unit. New distribution partnerships could unlock additional revenue opportunities in coming quarters.

Disney’s exposure to high-profile media events highlights ongoing portfolio risks. The entertainment business remains sensitive to public relations challenges and content controversies.

The November earnings report will provide updated guidance on streaming subscriber trends and theme park performance metrics.

The post Disney (DIS) Stock Takes Hit as Kimmel Controversy Rocks ABC Network appeared first on CoinCentral.

Aviso legal: Los artículos republicados en este sitio provienen de plataformas públicas y se ofrecen únicamente con fines informativos. No reflejan necesariamente la opinión de MEXC. Todos los derechos pertenecen a los autores originales. Si consideras que algún contenido infringe derechos de terceros, comunícate con service@support.mexc.com para solicitar su eliminación. MEXC no garantiza la exactitud, la integridad ni la actualidad del contenido y no se responsabiliza por acciones tomadas en función de la información proporcionada. El contenido no constituye asesoría financiera, legal ni profesional, ni debe interpretarse como recomendación o respaldo por parte de MEXC.
Compartir perspectivas

También te puede interesar

Unveiling the Shocking Truth: Why Crypto Security Budgets Lag Behind Marketing

Unveiling the Shocking Truth: Why Crypto Security Budgets Lag Behind Marketing

BitcoinWorld Unveiling the Shocking Truth: Why Crypto Security Budgets Lag Behind Marketing The cryptocurrency world is constantly evolving, yet one crucial aspect often gets overlooked: crypto security. Have you ever wondered why, despite technological advancements, significant financial losses continue to plague the industry? Ronghui Gu, co-founder of leading blockchain security firm CertiK, recently shed light on a surprising truth that challenges common perceptions about where projects are truly failing. What’s Truly Behind Crypto’s Major Financial Losses? During an insightful roundtable at KBW 2025, Gu clarified that the industry frequently misunderstands the root causes of major financial losses. Many assume smart contract vulnerabilities are solely to blame, but the reality is more complex. Last year, an estimated $1.4 billion in damages was recorded. Gu emphasized these losses weren’t exclusively due to technical flaws. Human factors, like negligence or phishing, also played a significant role. No program is ever perfectly secure. This fundamental understanding drives CertiK’s approach, which employs a multi-layered defense system. This includes rigorous code reviews, comprehensive security audits, and continuous, real-time monitoring. This holistic strategy aims to cover all potential weak points, acknowledging that threats constantly evolve. The Alarming Disparity: Marketing vs. Crypto Security Spending Perhaps Gu’s most striking revelation was the stark difference in how projects allocate their budgets. He highlighted that most projects dedicate substantially larger budgets to marketing than to essential crypto security measures. This imbalance creates a dangerous vulnerability: Marketing focuses on growth: It’s about visibility, hype, and attracting new investors. Security focuses on protection: It’s about safeguarding assets, maintaining trust, and ensuring long-term viability. Gu firmly believes technical tools alone are insufficient for robust security. Raising awareness among developers, project teams, and investors is equally important. When projects prioritize outward appearance and rapid expansion over fundamental protection, they expose themselves and their users to unnecessary risks. Boosting Your Project’s Crypto Security: Lessons from Industry Leaders So, how can we shift this paradigm and strengthen crypto security? Gu urged more projects to learn from successful industry examples. Projects like WEMIX and Klaytn have demonstrated proactive commitment by significantly increasing their security budgets. This strategic investment is not just an expense; it’s a critical foundation for sustainable growth and user trust. Here are key takeaways for projects aiming to enhance their security posture: Reallocate Budgets: Reconsider the balance between marketing and security. Secure projects build trust. Embrace Multi-Layered Defense: Go beyond a single audit. Think continuous monitoring and internal protocols. Prioritize Education: Invest in team training and educate your community. Human error is a major attack vector. Seek Expert Guidance: Partner with reputable security firms like CertiK. Ultimately, a strong focus on crypto security isn’t just about preventing losses; it’s about building a resilient, trustworthy ecosystem that can thrive. Summary: Investing in Security is Investing in the Future Ronghui Gu’s insights from CertiK serve as a powerful wake-up call. The misconception that all financial losses stem solely from smart contract vulnerabilities needs correction. More importantly, the alarming trend of prioritizing marketing over fundamental crypto security must be reversed. Projects emulating leaders like WEMIX and Klaytn by dedicating sufficient resources to security will protect assets, users, and foster greater confidence for sustainable, long-term success in decentralized finance. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What did CertiK co-founder Ronghui Gu highlight? A1: Gu clarified that crypto losses involve human factors, not just smart contract flaws, and projects often prioritize marketing over security. Q2: Why aren’t technical tools enough for crypto security? A2: Human factors contribute significantly to breaches. Awareness and education for developers, projects, and investors are crucial for comprehensive protection. Q3: Which projects exemplify increased security budgets? A3: WEMIX and Klaytn were cited for proactively increasing their security budgets, setting a positive industry precedent. Q4: What is CertiK’s approach to smart contract security? A4: CertiK uses a multi-layered defense: code reviews, security audits, and continuous monitoring, addressing both technical and human-related risks. Q5: What are key actions for projects to improve security? A5: Projects should reallocate budgets, implement multi-layered defenses, prioritize education, and seek expert guidance from security firms. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network to spread awareness about the critical importance of crypto security in our rapidly evolving digital landscape! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping blockchain security institutional adoption. This post Unveiling the Shocking Truth: Why Crypto Security Budgets Lag Behind Marketing first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Compartir
Coinstats2025/09/24 09:00
Compartir