DOJ wants Google to sell AdX to reduce monopoly powerDOJ wants Google to sell AdX to reduce monopoly power

Google antitrust trial opens as DOJ pushes for AdX breakup

2025/09/23 02:11

Google is fighting to prevent the breakup of its advertising business as a major U.S. antitrust trial gets underway in Alexandria, Virginia. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and several states are pushing for the tech giant to sell its ad exchange, AdX, arguing that it has abused its dominance in online advertising.

This high-profile case is part of a broader U.S. crackdown on Big Tech. Similar legal battles are underway against Meta, Amazon, and Apple, making Google’s trial a key test of how far courts will go to reshape the online advertising landscape.

DOJ pushes Google to sell AdX in court

The DOJ claims Google exploits websites through its AdX platform by charging a 20% fee on every ad sale. Critics argue that this fee is excessive, giving it an unfair edge over competitors.

The agency is pushing for the tech giant to sell AdX and make the ad auction system transparent. DOJ officials believe this would allow other companies to compete fairly, since Google controls nearly all ad auctions.

Judge Leonie Brinkema, who presides over the trial, has already stated that Google holds illegal monopolies in online advertising. She will determine the remedies required, but the DOJ says the company should also sell its publisher ad server if its proposed reforms fail to boost competition within four years.

The trial will feature testimonies from media industry figures affected by Google’s dominance. Representatives from DailyMail.com, Advance Local, and former News Corp leaders will describe how Google forced them to remain within its ad system. Witnesses say Google’s auction process gave its own advertisers the first and last opportunity to bid, leaving website owners with less revenue than they might have earned in a fair market.

They will also explain how Google’s policies hindered publishers from cutting costs and blocked competition from other ad tech companies. These accounts aim to show the real-world impact of Google’s control and support the DOJ’s argument that selling AdX and implementing these reforms would foster fairer competition in online advertising.

Google proposes policy changes to avoid breakup

In response, Google told the court that it does not want to be forced to sell AdX and that the court should take a careful approach before making any big decisions. The company referred to a recent case in Washington, D.C., where another judge looked at a similar antitrust case about Google Search and rejected most of the demands from the DOJ. 

Google says selling AdX could create long-lasting problems and confusion for advertisers who pay to show their ads. Additionally, it says it would be better for everyone if the rules and policies were changed rather than the entire business being broken up.

The court insists that changing the rules will help publishers and advertisers work more easily in the market and let other companies compete fairly. However, Google’s main goal is to keep the current system and avoid chaos for businesses that rely on its ad systems.

The Department of Justice argues that these changes are insufficient, as Google would still control the key parts of the ad system. During the trial, the court may also review internal Google studies and documents from a past European investigation into selling AdX.

These documents could show Google’s thoughts about selling AdX, its meaning, and why the firm chose not to sell it. Showing these documents in court may make things difficult for Google because it could prove that the company could have sold AdX but decided to keep it. 

If the court sides with the DOJ, this could be the biggest change to Google’s business since the company started. However, if the court asks the firm only to change policies, many people who worry about Big Tech may see it as another missed chance to reduce the power of very large companies. Either way, the outcome will show how far courts will go to make online advertising fair.

KEY Difference Wire: the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage

Aviso legal: Los artículos republicados en este sitio provienen de plataformas públicas y se ofrecen únicamente con fines informativos. No reflejan necesariamente la opinión de MEXC. Todos los derechos pertenecen a los autores originales. Si consideras que algún contenido infringe derechos de terceros, comunícate con service@support.mexc.com para solicitar su eliminación. MEXC no garantiza la exactitud, la integridad ni la actualidad del contenido y no se responsabiliza por acciones tomadas en función de la información proporcionada. El contenido no constituye asesoría financiera, legal ni profesional, ni debe interpretarse como recomendación o respaldo por parte de MEXC.
Compartir perspectivas

También te puede interesar

Stablecoins Unveiled: JPMorgan CEO’s Decisive Stance on Bank Deposits

Stablecoins Unveiled: JPMorgan CEO’s Decisive Stance on Bank Deposits

BitcoinWorld Stablecoins Unveiled: JPMorgan CEO’s Decisive Stance on Bank Deposits The world of finance is constantly evolving, and the rise of digital assets has sparked numerous debates. Recently, a significant voice from traditional banking weighed in on one of these crucial discussions. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has offered a clarifying perspective on stablecoins, stating unequivocally that these digital assets do not pose a threat to conventional bank deposits. This insight offers a fascinating glimpse into how established financial institutions are viewing the burgeoning crypto landscape. JPMorgan’s View: Why Stablecoins Aren’t a Threat Jamie Dimon’s comments, shared in a recent interview, highlight a nuanced understanding of the digital asset space. He emphasized that while he isn’t concerned about stablecoins displacing traditional deposits, the banking sector must proactively engage with them. This preparation is crucial for understanding their commercialization and potential integration into broader financial systems. A key reason for this perspective stems from the observed demand for U.S. dollars held in the form of stablecoins, particularly overseas. This demand isn’t about replacing bank accounts but rather providing an efficient, digital means to access and transact with the world’s primary reserve currency. It’s a testament to the utility stablecoins offer in certain international contexts. JPMorgan itself is not a bystander in this evolution. The financial giant is already involved in businesses related to these digital assets and is actively considering forming a consortium. This strategic move suggests a recognition of stablecoins as a tool for innovation rather than an existential competitor to their core banking services. Furthermore, it demonstrates a forward-thinking approach to leveraging new technologies within a regulated framework. Understanding the Appeal of Stablecoins Globally So, what exactly makes stablecoins so attractive, especially in international markets? Essentially, stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to minimize price volatility. They achieve this by pegging their value to a stable asset, most commonly the U.S. dollar. This stability is a significant draw, differentiating them from more volatile cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum. For individuals and businesses operating across borders, stablecoins offer several compelling advantages: Enhanced Access to USD: They provide a digital pathway to hold and transfer U.S. dollars without necessarily needing a traditional bank account in certain jurisdictions, particularly in regions with limited banking infrastructure or capital controls. Faster Transactions: Transfers can often be significantly quicker and more efficient than traditional wire transfers, especially when sending money internationally across different time zones and banking systems. Potentially Lower Fees: Depending on the blockchain network and specific stablecoin, transaction costs can be considerably lower compared to conventional international remittance services. Increased Transparency: As transactions are typically recorded on a public blockchain, they offer a level of transparency and auditability that can be beneficial for compliance and record-keeping. This utility is what Dimon likely refers to when he speaks of overseas demand. It’s about practical application and fulfilling a specific market need, rather than directly competing with the fundamental role of a bank in safeguarding customer deposits and providing credit. Navigating the Future: Banking and Digital Assets The banking industry’s proactive approach to understanding and preparing for the commercialization of stablecoins is a positive sign. It indicates a willingness to adapt and potentially integrate new technologies rather than resist them outright. This shift could lead to exciting new financial products and services that bridge the gap between traditional finance and the decentralized world, creating a more interconnected global financial ecosystem. However, the journey isn’t without its complexities. Regulatory frameworks for stablecoins are still evolving globally, and ensuring consumer protection, financial stability, and robust anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) compliance remains paramount. Governments and central banks worldwide are grappling with how to classify and supervise these digital assets, creating a dynamic and sometimes uncertain environment. As such, the formation of consortia, as JPMorgan is exploring, could be a strategic way for established financial players to collectively navigate these regulatory challenges. By collaborating, they can help shape industry best practices, advocate for clear regulatory guidelines, and ensure the responsible development and deployment of stablecoins within the broader financial system. This collaborative effort is vital for mainstream adoption and mitigating potential risks. Dimon also briefly touched upon broader economic conditions, noting that further interest rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve could prove difficult. This is largely due to persistent inflation concerns, which continue to influence monetary policy decisions and the overall economic outlook. While separate from the stablecoins discussion, it underscores the complex financial environment in which these digital asset conversations are taking place, adding another layer of consideration for market participants. The Evolving Landscape of Digital Currency and Banking Jamie Dimon’s statement provides a crucial perspective: stablecoins, rather than being a direct threat, are emerging as a distinct financial tool with specific use cases, particularly for international dollar-denominated transactions. His pragmatic view, coupled with JPMorgan’s active exploration in the space, suggests a future where traditional finance and innovative digital assets can coexist and even complement each other. The ongoing dialogue between banking leaders and the crypto community is essential for fostering innovation responsibly. As the demand for digital dollars continues to grow, particularly across borders, understanding and integrating stablecoins into the global financial fabric will be key to unlocking new efficiencies and opportunities for everyone. This collaborative spirit will ultimately define the next era of global finance. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Stablecoins and Banking Q1: What exactly are stablecoins? A: Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value, typically by pegging their price to a reserve asset like the U.S. dollar or gold. This minimizes volatility, making them suitable for transactions and as a store of value. Q2: Why does JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon not view stablecoins as a threat to bank deposits? A: Dimon believes stablecoins serve different purposes, particularly fulfilling overseas demand for holding U.S. dollars digitally. He sees them as a tool for efficiency and innovation in specific international contexts rather than a direct competitor to traditional bank deposits. Q3: What is the primary use case for stablecoins highlighted by Dimon? A: The primary use case mentioned is the overseas demand for holding U.S. dollars in a digital form. This facilitates faster, potentially cheaper international transactions and provides access to USD without requiring a traditional U.S. bank account. Q4: Is JPMorgan actively involved with stablecoins or related businesses? A: Yes, JPMorgan is involved in businesses related to stablecoins and is actively considering forming a consortium. This indicates their strategic interest in understanding and integrating these digital assets into their operations. Q5: What challenges do stablecoins currently face in the broader financial system? A: Stablecoins face evolving regulatory frameworks globally, requiring clear guidelines for consumer protection, financial stability, and robust anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) compliance. These regulatory uncertainties are a key area of focus for the industry. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your thoughts and discussions help foster a better understanding of the evolving financial landscape. Join the conversation on social media and spread the word about the future of banking and digital assets. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoins institutional adoption. This post Stablecoins Unveiled: JPMorgan CEO’s Decisive Stance on Bank Deposits first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Compartir
Coinstats2025/09/23 14:45
Compartir