Trump-Linked DeFi WLFI Thwarts 24.6B Token Hack Attempts

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) – a Trump family–backed DeFi token – launched Sept. 1, 2025 with about 24.6 billion WLFI unlocked (20% of a 100 billion supply).

Early trading saw WLFI briefly above $0.30, before it slid roughly 18% to about $0.18 at press time.

On Sept. 3, WLFI announced it had blocked two hacking attempts on its token “lockbox” by on-chain blacklisting of compromised wallets.

The team emphasized these exploits stemmed from user key losses (not a WLFI code vulnerability) and said blacklisting “allowed us to block the theft attempts from the Lockbox.”

WLFI’s initial circulating supply was fixed at 24.6 billion tokens. Distribution at launch was announced as 10 billion tokens to World Liberty Financial, Inc., 7.7 billion to Alt5 Sigma, 2.8 billion for liquidity/marketing, and 4 billion to early public-sale buyers (20% unlocked).

24.66 billion WLFI were unlocked on Sept. 1. Early investors had voted in July to permit trading, and derivatives markets showed huge interest: open interest in WLFI futures neared $950 million just hours before launch (peaking at $887 Million after launch).

On-Chain Blacklisting Foils Lockbox Hacks

On Sept. 3 WLFI posted that it had executed “mass blacklisting” transactions to disable dozens of wallets identified as compromised.

WLFI disclosed that it had prevented two hacking attacks stemming from end-user compromises.

The project said hackers had targeted its Lockbox (the vesting contract for locked tokens), but blacklisting the affected addresses “foiled attempts to steal funds from the lockbox.”

Source: X

WLFI stressed the issues were due to private key loss on users’ end, “not an exploit of the WLFI project itself.” The team is now assisting affected token holders in recovering access to their accounts.

Security experts have warned WLFI holders about a related exploit tied to Ethereum’s May 2025 Pectra upgrade (EIP-7702).

SlowMist founder Yu Xian reported that attackers have been using a “classic EIP-7702 phishing exploit” on WLFI wallets.

In this method, a malicious contract is pre-planted in the victim’s wallet so that any subsequent WLFI transfer is immediately diverted to the attacker.

In practice, users have had WLFI tokens stolen the instant they attempted transfers. The EIP-7702 change allows externally owned accounts to temporarily delegate execution rights.

It streamlines transactions but also opens “an off-chain attack vector” for such signed-message exploits.

WLFI has warned users to watch for suspicious delegate authorizations and to move funds only from secure wallets.

World Liberty Financial Price, Volume & Token Burn

WLFI’s market performance has been volatile. The token’s price fell about 30–36% from the $0.331 launch-day peak to roughly $0.23 within two days.

CoinGecko data confirm an all-time high of $0.3313 on September 1 and an all-time low near $0.2106.

Trading volumes were initially enormous: CoinGecko notes $4.46 Billion in 24h trading on debut, later dipping by over 60% to about $1.14 Billion.

As of September 3, WLFI was trading in the low $0.20s, roughly 30% below its peak.

At $0.25, WLFI’s implied market cap was around $7 Billion, making it roughly the 31st-largest crypto asset by supply.

To stabilize the price, WLFI’s team implemented a token burn: they sent 47 million WLFI to a burn address on September. This was about $11.3 Million worth at the time.

The burn (0.19% of circulating supply) was accompanied by a proposal to use protocol fees for ongoing buyback-and-burn. These measures aim to boost scarcity as trading pulls WLFI’s value lower.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/09/04/trump-linked-defi-wlfi-thwarts-24-6b-token-hack-attempts/

Aviso legal: Los artículos republicados en este sitio provienen de plataformas públicas y se ofrecen únicamente con fines informativos. No reflejan necesariamente la opinión de MEXC. Todos los derechos pertenecen a los autores originales. Si consideras que algún contenido infringe derechos de terceros, comunícate con service@support.mexc.com para solicitar su eliminación. MEXC no garantiza la exactitud, la integridad ni la actualidad del contenido y no se responsabiliza por acciones tomadas en función de la información proporcionada. El contenido no constituye asesoría financiera, legal ni profesional, ni debe interpretarse como recomendación o respaldo por parte de MEXC.
Compartir perspectivas

También te puede interesar

Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin

Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin

XRP CTO defends energy efficiency over Litecoin’s PoW consensus model. Litecoin’s controversial social media post intensifies crypto rivalry with XRP. XRP dominates institutional adoption, leaving Litecoin behind in market support. The rivalry between the XRP and Litecoin communities has reached a new level of intensity, with Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, stepping into the debate. In a recent response to claims from the Litecoin camp, Schwartz criticized Litecoin’s energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) model, calling it a flaw rather than a feature. His remarks reignited the ongoing discussion about energy consumption in blockchain technology and its long-term impact. The value of the PoW mechanism in Litecoin has long been argued in defence by Litecoin community member Jonny Litecoin. According to them, similarly to Bitcoin, Litecoin needs to be mined in real life, creating additional value. Jonny Litecoin directed his aim at XRP, arguing that it was free and mined out of thin air by a company in the first place, not by mining or staking. He also criticized Ripple because it was allotting 1 billion XRP tokens to its escrow account every month, questioned the value of XRP, and called it centralized. Two products are equivalent except that one takes much more energy to make than the other. Which one do you think is the most likely to grow in popularity over time? — David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) September 3, 2025 Also Read: BitMine Acquires $64.7M in ETH, Pushing Toward 5% of Total Ethereum Supply Contrastingly, David Schwartz opined that the future of blockchain technology would depend on its energy efficiency. He noted that when two assets are essentially similar but one of them uses a lot more energy, the more efficient one will tend to become the choice in the long term. Since the cost of energy is increasing worldwide, Schwartz highlighted that blockchain projects with a more efficiency-driven scope would be in a better place to grow sustainably. Litecoin’s Controversial Social Media Jabs at XRP Litecoin recently escalated tensions further by taking a direct jab at XRP via a tweet from its official account. The tweet compared XRP whales to the heartbeat of a blue whale, saying, “You can hear a blue whale’s heartbeat from over two miles away, which is the complete opposite of XRP whales since they’re all dead on the inside.” The tweet was met with a mix of reactions—some users found it humorous, while others dismissed it as ineffective. Decentralization and quick transactions have been a long-running presence in the Litecoin community and have been used in contrast to the XRP use case of cross-border payments. This was one in a series of provocative statements by the Litecoin community; a similar tweet had been made comparing the XRP tokens with the scent of rotten eggs, urine, and almonds. These insults underline the increasing conflict between the two cryptocurrencies and their respective fan bases. XRP’s Institutional Advantage Despite the ongoing social media feud, XRP continues to lead in institutional adoption. XRP has seen significant support, with over a dozen spot ETF filings and nearly $1.4 billion in investment inflows. In comparison, Litecoin has attracted only $4.71 million. With a market cap more than 30 times that of Litecoin, XRP is positioned to lead the race for future dominance, especially as energy efficiency and institutional backing become key factors in the cryptocurrency landscape. Also Read: Ripple Expands RLUSD Stablecoin in Africa, Offering Regulated Digital Dollar for Institutional Use The post Crypto War Continues: Ripple (XRP) CTO Claps Back at Litecoin appeared first on 36Crypto.
Compartir
Coinstats2025/09/04 18:09
Compartir