Why Growing Companies Shouldn’t Rely Too Heavily on No-Code Tools

2025/08/25 02:37

\ No-code tools are everywhere. They’re a quick fix to develop apps, automate processes, and build websites without a team of developers.

But here’s the thing, you don't have to do it because you can.

No-code tools solve immediate problems by letting you build fast, but they usually create bigger challenges down the road. They have limitations in customization, security, scalability; you name it.

These limitations can eventually increase your reliance on manual fixes, which is what you wanted to avoid in the first place.

In this article, I'll share the disadvantages of no-code tools for growing companies and explain why and when they stop being effective for you.

5 Reasons Growing Companies Should Reconsider Relying on No-Code Tools

:::info Disclaimer: No-code tools are great. They're time-efficient, and allow you to create your website, app or internal systems without too much interference from your technical team (if you have any).

:::

\ But they have limitations, especially if you're scaling your company to accommodate more users, team members, and clients:

1. No code tools leave little room for customization

No-code tools let you create technical solutions without needing a developer, but many times, you can't exactly customize these solutions to your taste.

You can tweak some things (colors, logos, background, etc.), but when it comes to specific business needs (like when you need to integrate with custom enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to process your orders and inventories), these tools may need a lot of manual workarounds.

For instance, let's assume a subscription-based SaaS company uses Bubble (a popular no-code platform) to handle customer billing.

Bubble allows you to integrate payment workflows via Stripe, and you can set up standard recurring plans. However, there's no built-in, flexible billing logic for tiered pricing based on usage, or conditional discounts (like the ones for early payment or loyalty-based discounts).

If you want these features, you would need custom API workflows or external plugins, which means you still need to code after all.

And let's assume that Stripe has usage tracking and tiered pricing features on its own, you would need extra technical setup and external automation to integrate it with Bubble.

It's either this, or you stick to ready-made templates that can only take you so far.

2. No-code tools are hard to scale

No-code tools are perfect for getting your business off the ground fast, but they aren't built to scale with your company.

Your company’s workflow becomes more complex as you grow; you’ll need multiple integrations to handle new services and larger databases.

Many no-code tools can't handle operations at a larger scale, and when this happens, your automation may slow down or fail, there may be lags on functionality, and you can even hit platform limits (based on usage). Sometimes, it breaks other things in your code, like this Redditor complained.

The worst part is, unlike code you control, you can't optimize the backend to work for you.

Most times, you’ll end up depending on the platform to do what it cannot do, pay extra to get it done manually, or leave work early because you’ve been pulling at your hair so long, it hurts.

3. You're dependent on third-party providers.

We all know relying on third-party platforms to run your business can be risky. What happens when they hike their prices or change their terms?

Now, this is not related, but a few days ago, Lars Lofgren posted on LinkedIn about Ahrefs' “unhinged” fee for their AI tracking tool.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/larslofgrenam-i-the-only-one-that-thinks-ahrefs-ai-activity-7353540478417457153-TNR?embedable=true

\

:::tip PS: Ahrefs AI tracking tool is not a no-code tool.

:::

However, Lofgren says that:

I’d only pay if I had a client writing crazy blank checks and was obsessed with AI visibility (I do not have one of those).”

He could make his choice, because even though AI tracking tools are slowly gaining visibility, he wasn't dependent on the Ahrefs AI tracking tool, because AI tracking is still in “its cute toy phase”.

With no code tools, you're basically building your business on someone else’s turf.

If a vendor goes under, makes changes you don't agree with, or hikes their prices (like Ahrefs did), you have no choice but to adapt or move everything to a new platform.

And moving isn't always easy.

You’ll need to research and find a new tool, transfer your data, get your team accustomed to the new platform (which could take weeks), and if it's a client portal tool, you’d also need to re-onboard your clients to another platform.

It's unstable, and may not help your business as you intended.

4. Can you be sure about security?

If you're in a highly regulated industry or deal with sensitive customer data, no-code tools may not meet the security standards you need.

For instance, GDPR compliance or HIPAA regulations require specific security protocols that no-code platforms may not be able to guarantee.

Since you have little to no control over the backend processes, you can't fully implement GDPR’s privacy by design principles, like the granular controls needed for user consent and data minimization.

And this is not to say that no-code platforms are not secure. They come with basic security features you need for a basic website, but they don't offer the level of protection you’ll need as you scale.

If you're handling sensitive customer data, you need full control over your systems and infrastructure.

Building your own systems means you get to set the rules, and when the rules need to change, you have full autonomy to change them.

5. There may be hidden long-term costs

No-code tools are a good bargain for the short term, but as you grow, most of these tools ask you to pay for extra features, additional team members you hire, more storage, and third-party integrations.

Even worse, you’ll still have to invest in custom development anyway to fix the problems no-code tools create, like paying for advanced features that the platform doesn't support, or ensuring regulatory compliance or security standards that need deeper technical control.

In other words, no-code tools might save you a little money upfront, but they often cost you more in the long run.

And it's not just monetary costs, you’ll spend a lot of time and energy dealing with workarounds, inefficiencies, and eventual migrations.

Conclusion

You’ll hit a wall with no-code tools if your business needs more than the basics. These tools are fine for quick launches, but you need custom solutions if your company is scaling. Start with no-code tools, but plan for custom solutions as your business grows.

\n

Aviso legal: Los artículos republicados en este sitio provienen de plataformas públicas y se ofrecen únicamente con fines informativos. No reflejan necesariamente la opinión de MEXC. Todos los derechos pertenecen a los autores originales. Si consideras que algún contenido infringe derechos de terceros, comunícate con service@support.mexc.com para solicitar su eliminación. MEXC no garantiza la exactitud, la integridad ni la actualidad del contenido y no se responsabiliza por acciones tomadas en función de la información proporcionada. El contenido no constituye asesoría financiera, legal ni profesional, ni debe interpretarse como recomendación o respaldo por parte de MEXC.
Compartir perspectivas

También te puede interesar

Stablecoins and RWA cross-border innovation practices, Shanghai seminar discusses the new financial ecosystem

Stablecoins and RWA cross-border innovation practices, Shanghai seminar discusses the new financial ecosystem

Blockchain technology has become the core driving force for the digital transformation of the financial industry, demonstrating huge potential in application scenarios such as cross-border payments and financial innovation. In particular, stablecoins and RWA ( Real World Assets), as key areas for the implementation of blockchain technology, have attracted widespread attention from the global market. To further promote industry exchanges and explore the opportunities and challenges brought about by the rapid development of stablecoins and RWA , the "Blockchain-Driven Stablecoins and RWA : Exploring Cross-Border Trade and Financial Innovation Practices" event was successfully held in Shanghai on the afternoon of August 22nd . It was hosted by the Shanghai Financial Information Industry Association and the Shanghai Distributed Consensus Technology Association, co-organized by PANews and Mankiw LLP, and supported by Mobile Payment Network and the Blockchain Technology Application Alliance . The seminar was hosted by Zang Qin, Deputy Secretary-General of the Shanghai Financial Information Industry Association. It focused on the exploration and practice of stablecoins and RWA in cross-border trade, financial compliance and other fields. It attracted more than 100 practitioners from banks, securities companies, law firms, asset management institutions, financial technology and start-ups to participate and jointly discuss the implementation path and future development of stablecoins and RWA . Wu Jun, Secretary-General of the Shanghai Financial Information Industry Association, delivered an opening speech on behalf of the organizers, noting that stablecoins are not entirely new, but their payment properties offer significant advantages in cross-border trade , characterized by high efficiency and low costs. Compared to traditional financial systems, stablecoins can be deposited within seconds and offer extremely low fees, making them a highly promising payment tool in international trade. However, he also emphasized that innovation must be promoted under a strict regulatory framework and compliance premise to ensure transparency , so that participants can jointly promote the stable development of digital finance on the basis of fully understanding the risks . PANews senior reporter Wang Shengyu provided an in-depth analysis of the "2025 Global Stablecoin Industry Development Report" during the report interpretation session. He noted that stablecoins have become one of the most critical infrastructures connecting traditional finance and the crypto market and are transforming the global financial landscape. His speech comprehensively analyzed the stablecoin industry, combining on-chain transaction data, policy developments, and the industry's evolutionary path. He systematically examined the six dimensions of stablecoins: development history, market structure, application scenarios, global regulation, development potential, and potential risks. In his opening keynote speech, Mao Jianhao, a senior attorney at Mankiw LLP, analyzed the core logic and compliance path of RWA tokenization from a legal compliance perspective. He noted that the core of RWA lies in its dual attributes of "digitalization " and "programmability," both of which are indispensable. Using BlackRock's BUIDL Fund as an example, he detailed its compliance architecture and on-chain transaction mechanism, emphasizing that "whitelisting mechanisms, redemption processes, and real-time valuation" are the first steps in exploring compliant tokenized funds . He believes that the future development of RWA will rely more on stablecoins as the underlying liquidity tool, and Hong Kong's stablecoin licensing system will provide a clear compliance framework for this field. With the rise of stablecoins and RWAs , the development of related applications within the infrastructure layer has also flourished. Conflux Co-founder and COO Zhang Yuanjie shared the role of domestic public chains in the globalization of stablecoins and RWAs from a public chain perspective , emphasizing the crucial role of the Asia-Pacific region, particularly Hong Kong and mainland China, in the RWA ecosystem. He also mentioned that the current market driving force of RWA mainly comes from the financial management needs of stablecoin holders, rather than traditional financial institutions. It is a bottom-up process of penetration from the crypto market to traditional finance. The final speaker, Zheng Lijiang, Research Manager at Shanghai Wanxiang Blockchain Co., Ltd., addressed the topic from a monetary theory perspective, arguing that stablecoins are not currencies but rather "quasi-currencies," essentially digital certificates issued by the private sector based on reserves such as government bonds. He further analyzed the differences between stablecoin policies in the United States and Hong Kong, noting that Hong Kong currently prioritizes Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) over encouraging DeFi integration. "Exploring the Application of Stablecoins in Cross-border Trade Payments" was the first topic of the roundtable discussion. This round was hosted by Mao Jianhao, a senior lawyer at Mankiw LLP, and invited guests including Zentek VP Erin Du , Robert Feng , Deputy Director of Global Institutional Cooperation for KUN Business, Xu Feng, founder of Coshine Kaixian Software, and Derek Wan, Head of BD for Cobo Payment , to participate in the discussion. Zentek VP Erin Du pointed out that cross-border payments face pain points such as slow bank review, long payment cycles, and high fees, especially in Southeast Asia, where financial infrastructure is still underdeveloped. Robert Feng, deputy director of global institutional cooperation at KUN , added that the political and financial environments of different countries vary greatly, and Latin America and Africa are more receptive to stablecoins due to their weak financial systems. Xu Feng, founder of Coshine Kaixian Software, shared his experience in helping overseas payment institutions connect to the Visa card issuance system, and believed that stablecoins have entered the practical stage in the To B scenario; Derek Wan, BD head of Cobo Payment, emphasized from the perspective of wallets and custody that security is the key to the implementation of stablecoin payments, and proposed the flexibility advantages of "full custody" and "MPC custody" one-stop solutions for cross-border payment companies going overseas. The guests unanimously agreed that stablecoins have moved from "proof of concept" to "large-scale trials" in cross-border payments, but compliance, security and the participation of financial institutions remain the main challenges. The second roundtable discussion focused on the topic of "Market Dynamics and Application Potential of Stablecoins and RWAs ". It was hosted by PANews senior reporter Jae , and guests including Conflux co-founder and COO Zhang Yuanjie, GF Securities Shanghai Branch Institutional Business Deputy Director Li Rongbin, HashKey Group Marketing Director Siya , CertiK Anti-Money Laundering Product Expert Cheng Yuan and others participated in the discussion. Conflux co-founder and COO Zhang Yuanjie pointed out that the core driving force behind the adoption of RWA is the financial management needs of stablecoin holders, and the integration of DeFi protocols has greatly enhanced its appeal through the dual-income model of "underlying asset returns + token incentives"; Li Rongbin, deputy director of institutional business at GF Securities Shanghai Branch, believes that listed companies' enthusiasm for RWAs is partly due to "market value management," but in the long run, they still need to return to the quality and liquidity of the assets themselves; Siya , head of marketing at HashKey Group , said that 2025 is the " first year of the RWA narrative," with factors such as improved regulatory clarity, mature technical infrastructure, and institutional entry jointly driving the market explosion; Cheng Yuan, an anti-money laundering product expert at CertiK , emphasized from a compliance and security perspective that RWA projects need to overcome compliance differences in multiple countries and monitor smart contract risks, and recommended that companies carefully consider the cost and security aspects. The guests believed that although RWA has advantages such as " democratic asset access " and " global liquidity " , it still faces bottlenecks such as high compliance costs, distribution channels relying on the European and American ecosystems, and a shortage of asset managers.
Compartir
PANews2025/08/25 17:35
Compartir