Ma’am Winnie’s remarks last week are a much-needed wake-up call for the UP School of Economics, which should be producing young, promising economists who are notMa’am Winnie’s remarks last week are a much-needed wake-up call for the UP School of Economics, which should be producing young, promising economists who are not

​​[In This Economy] ‘What has happened to the School?’: Winnie Monsod’s wake-up call

2026/02/13 15:43
7분 읽기

Last week, I had the great pleasure of moderating the fourth Ruperto P. Alonzo Memorial Lecture at the UP School of Economics (UPSE). This was organized by alumni of the School’s old Program in Development Economics (PDE), in honor of their late professor Sir Ruping (as he was lovingly called), who passed away back in 2017.

These days, the PDE program is known as the Master in Development Economics (MDE) program. But it has always catered to training economists and analysts in middle-level and technical positions in government, the private sector, and civil society organizations.

Anyway, the lecture last week featured Acting Secretary Rolando “Rolly” Toledo of the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), himself being a product of the PDE program. The theme was: “Protecting Fiscal Integrity: Fighting Corruption in Public Finance.” The discussants were Professor Cielo Magno, my colleague at the School and ardent advocate of budget reforms, and Dr. Jun Miral of the Congressional Policy and Budget Research Department. Also in the audience was former budget secretary Benjamin Diokno, a product of the early batches of the PDE program, and an emeritus professor of the School.

The lecture was memorable enough as a rare moment where government officials talked openly about the budget scandal that exploded in 2025. But it was made extra memorable by the fiery questions posed in the open forum by Professor Emerita Solita “Winnie” Monsod. (You can watch part of that here.)

First, she asked Secretary Toledo: “I’d like to know when did your office (or you personally) find out that there was something wrong? Because things don’t just explode, they build up…. Where did you go wrong?”

Secretary Toledo replied that he found out when it was “declared or presented” by the President. He added that unless a “financial and physical report” is submitted by an agency or validated by the Commission on Audit, the DBM doesn’t know that the problem exists. He also said that they issued a circular mandating agency heads to certify (through a notarized document) that programs they will pay are legitimate.

I asked Ma’am Winnie is she’s satisfied with the response, and she said emphatically, “No.”

She added, “How could you not have known? It’s beyond belief that we could not have known about this.” She pointed out (correctly) that the DBM itself should monitor the implementation of the national budget as part of its mandate, even if it is not a frontline agency to fight corruption.

At that time, Ma’am Winnie was already commanding the middle of the auditorium. Then she turned her to Ben Diokno who was seated to her left. She said, “And then we find that your [Diokno’s] assistant for so long… We have a budget secretary who resigned because of corruption…” Ma’am Winnie was referring to former budget secretary Amenah Pangandaman, a longtime assistant of Diokno and also a product of the PDE. Pangandaman resigned in November 2025 as investigations into flood control projects were heating up.

Ma’am Winnie then exclaimed, “What has happened to the School of Economics? I’m very, very disappointed, I must say… It hurts me that this corruption scandal occurred when members or graduates of the School of Economics were in positions of responsibility…”

This is a hard wake-up call for the School. But let me also add that it’s easy to overstate the role of the School. In basic economics, we teach that people respond to incentives, and the wrong incentives can lead to bad or misguided decisions by government officials, no matter how technically competent they are or no matter what school they came from.

Turning back to Secretary Toledo, Ma’am Winnie said, “I’m sorry if I offended you, you don’t get a very good grade from me.”

It was a historic moment because up until now, the role of UPSE alumni in the budget anomalies was kind of hush-hush. Ma’am Winnie’s put out in public an issue that hounds the School and its reputation.

Who authorized unprogrammed fund releases?

I followed up with questions on unprogrammed funds, noting that Congresswoman Mika Suansing, the current chair of the House Appropriations Committee, confirmed in 2025 that at least P141 billion in flood control projects in 2023 and 2024 were funded using unprogrammed appropriations.

Secretary Toledo confirmed that it was former budget secretary Amenah Pangandaman (a longtime assistant of Ben Diokno and also a graduate of the PDE program) who signed the Special Allotment Release Orders (SARO) that allowed the downloading of funds for anomalous flood control projects.

Ma’am Winnie interjected to point out that in 2008, the late budget secretary Emilia Boncodin already called out that unprogrammed funds were being abused. “Why do the technocrats not bring this out more forcefully?” She then asked Ben Diokno to clarify who approves the release of unprogrammed funds — the budget secretary or the president.

Diokno stood up, got a mic, and insisted that it’s the president who approves, and that the secretary cannot release it by himself or herself. He said that the secretary signs but they “must have a memo to the president, you cannot release it on your own — unless you changed the rules,” implying that during his time, things were a bit different.

But Secretary Toledo rebutted, “As far as I know, the [budget] secretary is the one who signs and approves the release from the unprogrammed appropriations,” so long as the law’s requirements are fulfilled.

This exchange gives mixed signals but has huge implications. Either Malacañang knew, or former budget secretary Pangandaman acted autonomously. (READ: Marcos, DBM can’t wash hands of ‘mangled’ 2025 budget – ex-finance chief)

On the one hand, if we follow Diokno’s logic, it would appear that President Marcos would have first-hand knowledge of flood control project approvals, if the budget secretary needs permission from the Palace before releasing unprogrammed funds. This would demolish the idea that Marcos was in any way “surprised” that flood control corruption was happening. At the same time, this serves to remove responsibility from the former budget secretary Pangandaman, a long-time assistant of Diokno.

On the other hand, the official line from Secretary Toledo is that the budget secretary signs and approves releases from unprogrammed funds, without needing the approval of the President. This would absolve the President but put the blame on Amenah Pangandaman who signed all the releases.

Later, there was agreement among economists in the room that the “original sin” came from the way Congress bloated unprogrammed funds. Cheekily, Cielo said that perhaps next time former congresswoman Stella Quimbo — another product and previous faculty of the School — should be invited to answer for the budget anomalies, insofar as she was the former vice-chair of the House Appropriations Committee (second-in-command to Zaldy Co and ally to former speaker Martin Romualdez).

Must Read

[In This Economy] Murder on the Budget Express

Wake-up call

In sum, Ma’am Winnie’s remarks last week are a much-needed wake-up call for the School. It cannot be denied that alumni of the School (especially Amenah Pangandaman and Stella Quimbo) were implicated in the whole budget mess that opened the floodgates to public works corruption. Other alumni were bureaucrats involved in the budget process one way or another.

Sure, it is unfair to blame the School entirely for the corruption scandal. But for good or bad, the School does produce graduates who find themselves in the halls of power later in their careers. And I do hope that at UPSE we are producing young, promising economists who are not just technically savvy but also possess strong moral fiber to speak out truth to power.

The broader lesson, I think, is about how easily technical expertise can be neutralized by broken political incentives. If we don’t fix these incentives, then expect otherwise good or competent people to stay silent or be eaten up by the system 10, 50, or even 100 years from now. – Rappler.com

Dr. JC Punongbayan is an assistant professor at the UP School of Economics and the author of False Nostalgia: The Marcos “Golden Age” Myths and How to Debunk Them. In 2024, he received The Outstanding Young Men (TOYM) Award for economics. Follow him on Instagram (@jcpunongbayan).

Click here for more In This Economy by JC Punongbayan articles.

시장 기회
Notcoin 로고
Notcoin 가격(NOT)
$0,0004085
$0,0004085$0,0004085
+%1,13
USD
Notcoin (NOT) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

추천 콘텐츠

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
Shocking Kenya Token Scam Takes Over Crypto Twitter

Shocking Kenya Token Scam Takes Over Crypto Twitter

The post Shocking Kenya Token Scam Takes Over Crypto Twitter appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Kenya’s former Prime Minister was apparently hacked to promote a scam token project. The announcement post on his X profile was deleted, and its video was almost certainly a deepfake. The project’s name and branding closely resemble another semi-official project with glaring red flags. This confusing quagmire raises many remaining questions. Sponsored Sponsored What is Kenya Token? Kenya has an underrated presence in the international crypto community, with pockets of grassroots adoption and major business partnerships conducted by the government. However, the new “Kenya Token” apparently tried to profit from this situation rather than contribute to it. Faked Kenya Token Announcement. Source: X Raila Odinga, the country’s former Prime Minister, was apparently hacked to announce the Kenya Token project. Soon after, though, it was removed, prompting concerns about a hack. Comparing the accompanying video to Odinga’s actual speaking voice, it seems extremely likely that this post was an AI-generated deepfake. The scam may have fallen apart, but there are many unanswered questions. These red flags could be an important lesson, especially as scam prevention techniques are failing the community. Who’s Behind This Scam? Sponsored Sponsored For example, analysts discovered a massive level of insider bundling with Kenya Digital Token (KDT). This is a totally separate asset apparently endorsed by sitting government officials, so the scam project may have tried to piggyback on KDT’s branding. Even this semi-official project was covered in red flags, however. Immediately after one KDT wallet conducted a TGE, 141 other accounts sniped 20% of the total supply. The site marketed these tokens as “locked for the people,” but they’re in private hands. Kenya Digital Token (KDT) is heavily bundled 150 connected addresses own 20% of the supply – worth $60M “Locked for the people” pic.twitter.com/vCVtq1WCRc — Bubblemaps (@bubblemaps) July 11, 2025 This led the community to…
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 06:40
Michael Saylor’s Strategy buys 850 BTC as MSTR stock dips

Michael Saylor’s Strategy buys 850 BTC as MSTR stock dips

Strategy continues to underperform Bitcoin, despite doubling down on BTC purchases Michael Saylor’s Strategy is doubling down on Bitcoin purchases, despite a dip in its stock price. On Sunday, September 21, the company announced an 850 Bitcoin (BTC) purchase that…
공유하기
Crypto.news2025/09/22 23:20