MAS defers prudential standards for bank crypto exposures, citing concerns over permissionless blockchain treatmentMAS defers prudential standards for bank crypto exposures, citing concerns over permissionless blockchain treatment

Singapore Delays Bank Crypto Asset Rules to 2027 Amid Industry Pushback

2025/10/13 18:30
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Singapore Delays Bank Crypto Asset Rules to 2027 Amid Industry Pushback

Singapore's central bank has postponed implementation of prudential rules governing how banks treat cryptocurrency exposures to 2027 or later, following industry feedback that the proposed standards would disadvantage the jurisdiction and stifle innovation.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) originally planned to implement the Basel Committee's cryptoasset standards from January 2026, aligning with international timelines. However, banks warned the early adoption would create regulatory arbitrage as other jurisdictions delayed similar rules.

"MAS will defer the implementation of the prudential treatment and disclosures of cryptoasset exposures to 1 January 2027 or later and will provide updates on the final cryptoasset standards and implementation date in due course," the regulator said in its response to consultation feedback.

The proposed rules would have required banks to hold capital against cryptocurrency exposures based on a classification system dividing digital assets into groups with different risk weights. Group 2 cryptoassets, including most cryptocurrencies on permissionless blockchains, would face a punitive 1,250% risk weight, effectively making such exposures prohibitively expensive for banks.

Industry respondents argued the classification conditions were "punitive and not technologically neutral," particularly for assets operating on permissionless blockchains. Banks contended the conservative treatment would push cryptoasset activities outside regulatory perimeters rather than achieving the intended prudential objectives.

"While respondents acknowledged that cryptoassets operating on permissionless blockchains could introduce novel risks compared to traditional assets, they expressed that such cryptoassets should not be precluded from being treated as Group 1 cryptoassets," MAS noted in its feedback response.

The delay allows MAS to consider technological advances including Layer 2 solutions that could potentially mitigate risks from permissionless blockchains. The regulator also acknowledged the need for greater international alignment on eligible reserve assets for Group 1b cryptoassets, particularly affecting stablecoin treatment.

"MAS recognises that since the publication of the cryptoasset standards, there have been advances in implementation practices (including technological safeguards through layer 2 solutions) which could potentially help mitigate the risks arising from the use of permissionless blockchains," the central bank and regulator stated.

During the interim period until implementation, banks with existing or planned cryptocurrency exposures must notify and engage MAS on appropriate prudential treatment. The regulator expects banks to apply treatment "largely aligned" with the consulted proposals.

The consultation also addressed treatment of stablecoins, with mixed industry views on whether cash or securities from repurchase agreements and similar transactions should qualify as eligible reserve assets. Some respondents proposed expanding eligible reserves to include money market instruments.

MAS indicated it would continue monitoring cryptoasset landscape developments and global regulatory progress "with a view towards promoting harmonisation in the implementation of the cryptoasset standards internationally and ensuring the appropriateness of the prudential standards."

The delay represents a significant concession to Singapore's financial industry, which has positioned the city-state as a crypto-friendly hub while maintaining strict regulatory oversight. Banks warned that implementing Basel standards ahead of other jurisdictions could disadvantage Singapore-based institutions in global competition.

Separately, MAS finalized rules requiring banks to exclude retail investors from purchasing Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital instruments, taking effect January 2026. The changes aim to protect retail investors from complex, loss-absorbing securities while maintaining banks' ability to issue regulatory capital to institutional investors.

The capital instrument rules clarify that banks need not track secondary market transactions but must ensure sale agreements with intermediaries prohibit onward sales to Singapore retail investors. Existing AT1 and Tier 2 instruments held by retail investors before January 2026 will be grandfathered indefinitely, MAS said.

➢ Stay ahead of the curve. Join Blockhead on Telegram today for all the latest in crypto.
+ Follow Blockhead on Google News
Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0,03689
$0,03689$0,03689
%0,00
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Covéa Chooses Shift Technology as Strategic Partner for Fraud and Risk Management

Covéa Chooses Shift Technology as Strategic Partner for Fraud and Risk Management

Covéa has selected Shift Technology as a long-term partner to support a consistent and shared view of risk from policy inception through to claims settlement The
Share
ffnews2026/04/02 07:00
On-chain ransom negotiations show ShibaSwap hacker won’t be low-balled

On-chain ransom negotiations show ShibaSwap hacker won’t be low-balled

The post On-chain ransom negotiations show ShibaSwap hacker won’t be low-balled appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On-chain messages between hacker and victim reveal a ransom standoff, with every demand etched permanently on the blockchain. Last Friday, $2.8 million worth of (mostly dog-themed) crypto tokens were stolen from ShibaSwap, a “next generation decentralized exchange” for the Shiba Inu ecosystem. Among the loot were approximately 250 billion KNINE tokens, from liquid staking protocol K9 Finance. K9 wants them back, and is willing to pay the hacker a bounty. The tokens are ostensibly worth over $600,000 at current market prices. Though a simulated swap, through extremely thin liquidity, paints a rather different picture. The hack was flagged by security firms Peckshield and Tikkala Security and involved using a “flash” loan to buy up enough tokens to achieve “majority validator power.” Then, the hacker signed “a malicious state to drain assets from the bridge.” They subsequently split up most of the stolen assets between various addresses but the stash of KNINE tokens, though, clearly not worth swapping, remains in their primary address. Read more: Circle and Tether bug bounties aren’t enough says LlamaRisk ShibaSwap hack negotiations begin On Monday, an address labelled “k9dev.eth” reached out to their “Dear Shibarium Bridge Hacker” on-chain, offering a five-ether (ETH) “bounty to return stolen KNINE tokens.” Presumably, the K9 team is very keen to avoid the hacker swapping such a large quantity of KNINE which would likely send its price to near zero. The message also contains the address of a bounty contract to facilitate the exchange, piling on the pressure with the warning that the “bounty will start to decrease in seven days.” Not one to be low-balled, however, the hacker has responded, “I can’t accept five ETH.” They instead propose no less than 50 ETH (around $225,000), adding “let me know when you are willing to meet that price.” The full exchange…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:25
Cardano Price Review: Can ADA Reach $1 by 2028?

Cardano Price Review: Can ADA Reach $1 by 2028?

As the second quarter begins, established networks are launching massive upgrades, yet their market value remains under heavy pressure. This disconnect is forcing
Share
Techbullion2026/04/02 19:51

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

USD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APRUSD1 Genesis: 0 Fees + 12% APR

New users: stake for up to 600% APR. Limited time!