The post the “Max Pain” between $73,000 and $84,000 according to André Dragosch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. According to André Dragosch, Head of Research at Bitwise Europe, the Bitcoin market is at a critical juncture, with price levels that could represent a genuine turning point for the digital asset.  FWIW — Think max max pain is reached the moment we tag either the IBIT cost basis at 84k or MSTR cost basis at 73k. Very likely we’ll see a final bottom somewhere in between. But these will be fire sale prices and akin to a full cycle reset imo. — André Dragosch, PhD⚡ (@Andre_Dragosch) November 19, 2025 Dragosch has recently identified two key thresholds that could mark the so-called “max pain,” the moment of maximum stress for investors before a potential market cycle recovery. Bitcoin’s Key Levels: $84,000 and $73,000 Dragosch highlighted that the max pain of Bitcoin could be reached when the price hits one of the two key levels: $84,000, which represents the average purchase cost for BlackRock’s IBIT fund, or $73,000, corresponding to the average carrying price of MicroStrategy.  These two thresholds are particularly significant because they reflect the entry points of two major institutional players in the Bitcoin market. The Importance of Average Costs for IBIT and MicroStrategy The IBIT fund by BlackRock and MicroStrategy’s accumulation strategy have become true benchmarks for the industry. The average purchase cost of IBIT, set at $84,000, represents the foundation upon which the expectations of one of the world’s largest asset managers are built.  Similarly, MicroStrategy’s average price of $73,000 indicates the level at which the company led by Michael Saylor has built its position in Bitcoin. The significance of “max pain” for the Bitcoin cycle According to Dragosch, reaching one of these levels could mark a true reset of the market cycle. In other words, if Bitcoin were to drop to 73,000 or 84,000 dollars, we… The post the “Max Pain” between $73,000 and $84,000 according to André Dragosch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. According to André Dragosch, Head of Research at Bitwise Europe, the Bitcoin market is at a critical juncture, with price levels that could represent a genuine turning point for the digital asset.  FWIW — Think max max pain is reached the moment we tag either the IBIT cost basis at 84k or MSTR cost basis at 73k. Very likely we’ll see a final bottom somewhere in between. But these will be fire sale prices and akin to a full cycle reset imo. — André Dragosch, PhD⚡ (@Andre_Dragosch) November 19, 2025 Dragosch has recently identified two key thresholds that could mark the so-called “max pain,” the moment of maximum stress for investors before a potential market cycle recovery. Bitcoin’s Key Levels: $84,000 and $73,000 Dragosch highlighted that the max pain of Bitcoin could be reached when the price hits one of the two key levels: $84,000, which represents the average purchase cost for BlackRock’s IBIT fund, or $73,000, corresponding to the average carrying price of MicroStrategy.  These two thresholds are particularly significant because they reflect the entry points of two major institutional players in the Bitcoin market. The Importance of Average Costs for IBIT and MicroStrategy The IBIT fund by BlackRock and MicroStrategy’s accumulation strategy have become true benchmarks for the industry. The average purchase cost of IBIT, set at $84,000, represents the foundation upon which the expectations of one of the world’s largest asset managers are built.  Similarly, MicroStrategy’s average price of $73,000 indicates the level at which the company led by Michael Saylor has built its position in Bitcoin. The significance of “max pain” for the Bitcoin cycle According to Dragosch, reaching one of these levels could mark a true reset of the market cycle. In other words, if Bitcoin were to drop to 73,000 or 84,000 dollars, we…

the “Max Pain” between $73,000 and $84,000 according to André Dragosch

According to André Dragosch, Head of Research at Bitwise Europe, the Bitcoin market is at a critical juncture, with price levels that could represent a genuine turning point for the digital asset. 

Dragosch has recently identified two key thresholds that could mark the so-called “max pain,” the moment of maximum stress for investors before a potential market cycle recovery.

Bitcoin’s Key Levels: $84,000 and $73,000

Dragosch highlighted that the max pain of Bitcoin could be reached when the price hits one of the two key levels: $84,000, which represents the average purchase cost for BlackRock’s IBIT fund, or $73,000, corresponding to the average carrying price of MicroStrategy. 

These two thresholds are particularly significant because they reflect the entry points of two major institutional players in the Bitcoin market.

The Importance of Average Costs for IBIT and MicroStrategy

The IBIT fund by BlackRock and MicroStrategy’s accumulation strategy have become true benchmarks for the industry. The average purchase cost of IBIT, set at $84,000, represents the foundation upon which the expectations of one of the world’s largest asset managers are built. 

Similarly, MicroStrategy’s average price of $73,000 indicates the level at which the company led by Michael Saylor has built its position in Bitcoin.

The significance of “max pain” for the Bitcoin cycle

According to Dragosch, reaching one of these levels could mark a true reset of the market cycle. In other words, if Bitcoin were to drop to 73,000 or 84,000 dollars, we might witness a “clear-out” phase, meaning a market cleansing that would lead to a new foundation from which to restart.

A Potential Final Bottom

Dragosch believes that the price of Bitcoin could find a definitive bottom precisely in this price range, between $73,000 and $84,000. 

This area would represent not only a point of maximum pain for many investors but also an opportunity for those ready to enter the market at what are considered bargain prices. Dragosch indeed refers to “fire sale prices,” which could attract new capital and mark the beginning of a new bull phase.

Implications for Institutional Investors

The presence of entities such as BlackRock and MicroStrategy among the major holders of Bitcoin gives particular significance to their average purchase costs. 

If the price were to approach or fall below these thresholds, many institutional investors might find themselves under significant pressure, forced to reconsider their portfolio strategies.

A Market Cycle Ready for Reset

According to Dragosch, reaching these levels could be likened to a complete reset of the market cycle. In this phase, weaker positions would be eliminated, making room for new entries and a possible resurgence of the positive trend. It would be a crucial moment, where the Bitcoin market could redefine its foundations and prepare for a new phase of growth.

What to Expect from the Market in the Coming Months

Dragosch’s analysis suggests that the Bitcoin market is facing a significant decision. If the price were to actually reach the range between $73,000 and $84,000, we might witness a phase of volatility and a possible capitulation of less convinced investors. However, precisely in this scenario, conditions could be created for a new bull cycle, supported by the influx of fresh capital and renewed confidence from market participants.

The Role of Retail and Institutional Investors

In this context, both retail investors and institutional ones will need to closely monitor market developments. The ability to identify signs of a potential bottom and seize opportunities presented by possible “fire sale prices” could make the difference between suffering losses in the current cycle and positioning oneself to benefit from the next growth phase.

Conclusions: A Pivotal Moment for Bitcoin

André Dragosch’s insights highlight the importance of price levels associated with the major institutional players in the Bitcoin market. The range between $73,000 and $84,000 represents an area of maximum interest, where the most significant selling pressures and buying opportunities of the current cycle could converge.

The Bitcoin market is thus gearing up for a decisive moment, where reaching the “max pain” could mark not only the end of a phase of weakness but also the beginning of a new growth season for the most discussed and observed digital asset of the moment.

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2025/11/21/bitcoin-the-max-pain-between-73000-and-84000-according-to-andre-dragosch/

Market Opportunity
THINK Token Logo
THINK Token Price(THINK)
$0.00214
$0.00214$0.00214
-0.92%
USD
THINK Token (THINK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

The post South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea has witnessed a pivotal development in its cryptocurrency landscape with BDACS introducing the nation’s first won-backed stablecoin, KRW1, built on the Avalanche network. This stablecoin is anchored by won assets stored at Woori Bank in a 1:1 ratio, ensuring high security. Continue Reading:South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/south-korea-launches-innovative-stablecoin-initiative
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 17:54
Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

The US pauses a $41B UK tech and AI deal as trade talks stall, with disputes over food standards, market access, and rules abroad.   The US has frozen a major tech
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/12/17 01:00
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40