Recently, both the Bitcoin and Ethereum communities have been paying close attention to privacy. Zama, which develops fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology, has launched its testnet, and the mainnet is expected to follow soon. What changes will Zama bring to privacy in the crypto space? Let's discuss this briefly: To put it simply, Zama is like giving Ethereum and other public blockchains a "super invisibility cloak," allowing users to transfer funds, lend, trade, buy and sell stocks, participate in prediction markets, etc., all on-chain with all data encrypted and invisible to everyone, not even the participating nodes. However, computations can still be performed, and verifications can still be publicly verified. It's similar to bringing the WeChat Pay experience to the blockchain, but with even greater privacy because even WeChat can't see your balance or transfer amounts. Vitalik no longer needs to worry about people seeing how much ETH he transfers each time. Previous blockchains failed to achieve privacy for a simple reason: they were completely public, like a transparent glass house. How much money was in each address, who it was transferred to, and the amount transferred were all visible to the entire world. Because of this, institutions and companies were hesitant to invest real money. Zama's technology, Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), is designed to solve this problem. In short, Zama isn't a new blockchain, but rather a "privacy layer" superimposed on existing blockchains. Users can use privacy features without switching chains. This aligns with a point we've consistently emphasized: privacy shouldn't be a feature of a single chain, but rather an optional feature for all chains. The advantage of full-chain encryption is that encrypted data can still be directly computed (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) without decryption; furthermore, it offers high security and is resistant to quantum computing. Zama's privacy computing technology has many applications. For example, if you transfer 1000 USDC to a friend, people can currently see the address to which you transferred the money and the amount transferred. With Zama, others can only see "someone transferred money," without seeing the amount or balance. This has a wide range of applications in the current DeFi field. For example, people participating in contracts on Lighter, lending on Aave, and trading on Uniswap are much harder to detect. DAO voting also has advantages; regardless of whether a user votes for or against, the result is public, but who voted is confidential. Institutions have consistently expressed demand for putting assets like stocks on the blockchain, but they also have privacy concerns, especially regarding RWA (Real World Wide Web). The blockchaining of stocks, bonds, and funds has always posed privacy issues, and Zama's technology can address these concerns. Institutions don't want their activities to be exposed, and once this issue is resolved, the probability of large-scale blockchain deployment of traditional assets increases. Another area where on-chain identity has remained underdeveloped is Zama's privacy technology, which could facilitate its widespread adoption. Specifically, on-chain identity can prove someone's adulthood, driver's license status, nationality, etc., without revealing ID card/passport numbers, thus addressing the current problem of identity theft. On-chain identity is more convenient than physical identity and is less likely to be lost, making it suitable for cross-border travelers. For developers, they can still write code using the familiar Solidity. They only need to replace the ordinary "addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" with the "encrypted version of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" provided by Zama. It is not complicated. After modifying a few lines of code, DeFi and voting can achieve privacy without needing to understand specific cryptography. In short, it's somewhat like the internet upgrading from HTTP (plaintext) to HTTPS (encrypted transmission). Zama is attempting to upgrade the blockchain from being "completely transparent and naked" to being "cloaked in full encryption," which could help address the issue of large sums of money being put on-chain in RWA.Recently, both the Bitcoin and Ethereum communities have been paying close attention to privacy. Zama, which develops fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology, has launched its testnet, and the mainnet is expected to follow soon. What changes will Zama bring to privacy in the crypto space? Let's discuss this briefly: To put it simply, Zama is like giving Ethereum and other public blockchains a "super invisibility cloak," allowing users to transfer funds, lend, trade, buy and sell stocks, participate in prediction markets, etc., all on-chain with all data encrypted and invisible to everyone, not even the participating nodes. However, computations can still be performed, and verifications can still be publicly verified. It's similar to bringing the WeChat Pay experience to the blockchain, but with even greater privacy because even WeChat can't see your balance or transfer amounts. Vitalik no longer needs to worry about people seeing how much ETH he transfers each time. Previous blockchains failed to achieve privacy for a simple reason: they were completely public, like a transparent glass house. How much money was in each address, who it was transferred to, and the amount transferred were all visible to the entire world. Because of this, institutions and companies were hesitant to invest real money. Zama's technology, Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), is designed to solve this problem. In short, Zama isn't a new blockchain, but rather a "privacy layer" superimposed on existing blockchains. Users can use privacy features without switching chains. This aligns with a point we've consistently emphasized: privacy shouldn't be a feature of a single chain, but rather an optional feature for all chains. The advantage of full-chain encryption is that encrypted data can still be directly computed (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) without decryption; furthermore, it offers high security and is resistant to quantum computing. Zama's privacy computing technology has many applications. For example, if you transfer 1000 USDC to a friend, people can currently see the address to which you transferred the money and the amount transferred. With Zama, others can only see "someone transferred money," without seeing the amount or balance. This has a wide range of applications in the current DeFi field. For example, people participating in contracts on Lighter, lending on Aave, and trading on Uniswap are much harder to detect. DAO voting also has advantages; regardless of whether a user votes for or against, the result is public, but who voted is confidential. Institutions have consistently expressed demand for putting assets like stocks on the blockchain, but they also have privacy concerns, especially regarding RWA (Real World Wide Web). The blockchaining of stocks, bonds, and funds has always posed privacy issues, and Zama's technology can address these concerns. Institutions don't want their activities to be exposed, and once this issue is resolved, the probability of large-scale blockchain deployment of traditional assets increases. Another area where on-chain identity has remained underdeveloped is Zama's privacy technology, which could facilitate its widespread adoption. Specifically, on-chain identity can prove someone's adulthood, driver's license status, nationality, etc., without revealing ID card/passport numbers, thus addressing the current problem of identity theft. On-chain identity is more convenient than physical identity and is less likely to be lost, making it suitable for cross-border travelers. For developers, they can still write code using the familiar Solidity. They only need to replace the ordinary "addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" with the "encrypted version of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" provided by Zama. It is not complicated. After modifying a few lines of code, DeFi and voting can achieve privacy without needing to understand specific cryptography. In short, it's somewhat like the internet upgrading from HTTP (plaintext) to HTTPS (encrypted transmission). Zama is attempting to upgrade the blockchain from being "completely transparent and naked" to being "cloaked in full encryption," which could help address the issue of large sums of money being put on-chain in RWA.

How does Zama give blockchain a "quantum invisibility suit"?

2025/11/27 18:00
4 min read

Recently, both the Bitcoin and Ethereum communities have been paying close attention to privacy. Zama, which develops fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology, has launched its testnet, and the mainnet is expected to follow soon. What changes will Zama bring to privacy in the crypto space? Let's discuss this briefly:

To put it simply, Zama is like giving Ethereum and other public blockchains a "super invisibility cloak," allowing users to transfer funds, lend, trade, buy and sell stocks, participate in prediction markets, etc., all on-chain with all data encrypted and invisible to everyone, not even the participating nodes. However, computations can still be performed, and verifications can still be publicly verified. It's similar to bringing the WeChat Pay experience to the blockchain, but with even greater privacy because even WeChat can't see your balance or transfer amounts. Vitalik no longer needs to worry about people seeing how much ETH he transfers each time.

Previous blockchains failed to achieve privacy for a simple reason: they were completely public, like a transparent glass house. How much money was in each address, who it was transferred to, and the amount transferred were all visible to the entire world. Because of this, institutions and companies were hesitant to invest real money. Zama's technology, Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), is designed to solve this problem.

In short, Zama isn't a new blockchain, but rather a "privacy layer" superimposed on existing blockchains. Users can use privacy features without switching chains. This aligns with a point we've consistently emphasized: privacy shouldn't be a feature of a single chain, but rather an optional feature for all chains. The advantage of full-chain encryption is that encrypted data can still be directly computed (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) without decryption; furthermore, it offers high security and is resistant to quantum computing.

Zama's privacy computing technology has many applications. For example, if you transfer 1000 USDC to a friend, people can currently see the address to which you transferred the money and the amount transferred. With Zama, others can only see "someone transferred money," without seeing the amount or balance. This has a wide range of applications in the current DeFi field. For example, people participating in contracts on Lighter, lending on Aave, and trading on Uniswap are much harder to detect. DAO voting also has advantages; regardless of whether a user votes for or against, the result is public, but who voted is confidential.

Institutions have consistently expressed demand for putting assets like stocks on the blockchain, but they also have privacy concerns, especially regarding RWA (Real World Wide Web). The blockchaining of stocks, bonds, and funds has always posed privacy issues, and Zama's technology can address these concerns. Institutions don't want their activities to be exposed, and once this issue is resolved, the probability of large-scale blockchain deployment of traditional assets increases.

Another area where on-chain identity has remained underdeveloped is Zama's privacy technology, which could facilitate its widespread adoption. Specifically, on-chain identity can prove someone's adulthood, driver's license status, nationality, etc., without revealing ID card/passport numbers, thus addressing the current problem of identity theft. On-chain identity is more convenient than physical identity and is less likely to be lost, making it suitable for cross-border travelers.

For developers, they can still write code using the familiar Solidity. They only need to replace the ordinary "addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" with the "encrypted version of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" provided by Zama. It is not complicated. After modifying a few lines of code, DeFi and voting can achieve privacy without needing to understand specific cryptography.

In short, it's somewhat like the internet upgrading from HTTP (plaintext) to HTTPS (encrypted transmission). Zama is attempting to upgrade the blockchain from being "completely transparent and naked" to being "cloaked in full encryption," which could help address the issue of large sums of money being put on-chain in RWA.

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.002974
$0.002974$0.002974
-1.49%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump sues New York Times for $15B, $TRUMP token

Trump sues New York Times for $15B, $TRUMP token

The post Trump sues New York Times for $15B, $TRUMP token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Donald Trump sued The New York Times, four of its journalists, and book publisher Penguin Random House for $15 billion in damages in a defamation lawsuit. The lawsuit, filed Monday in a federal court in Florida, alleges their stories intentionally damaged his reputation and one of his major businesses, the $TRUMP cryptocurrency token. In the complaint, Trump charges a sustained attempt by the Times and its reporters to take him down through what he describes as malicious and false reporting. The case identifies a book titled Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success, written by Times reporters Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner. And published by Penguin Random House. Trump’s attorneys contend that the book, as well as accompanying articles questioning his business history and connections between the $TRUMP token and Chinese crypto mogul Justin Sun. Which is unfairly injured both his reputation and his cryptocurrency venture. It responded by rejecting the allegations, referring to the suit as meritless. “This lawsuit has no merit. It has no legitimate legal claims and is instead an effort to discourage and stifle independent reporting,” the paper stated. By promising to keep fighting for press freedom. The legal action comes as the $TRUMP token suffers significant losses. Figures from CoinMarketCap indicate the coin has plunged almost 88% from its all-time high of around $75 to around $8.50. This is giving it a market capitalization of $1.7 billion. Trump maintains that negative news coverage directly contributed to the losses. It is a decline notwithstanding, Trump’s individual fortune has increased due to other crypto-related businesses and investments. Trump’s sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr.. They have diversified their engagement in blockchain ventures, highlighting the family’s continued thrust into digital assets. Source: https://thenewscrypto.com/trump-sues-new-york-times-for-15b-says-reporting-hurt-trump-token/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 13:01
BitGo offers regulated trading services for European institutions

BitGo offers regulated trading services for European institutions

The post BitGo offers regulated trading services for European institutions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways BitGo has launched regulated trading services in Europe after receiving approval from German regulator BaFin. The new service offers European institutions a platform that combines asset custody, trade execution, and aggregated liquidity. BitGo launched regulated trading services for European institutions today, following approval from German financial regulator BaFin. The digital asset infrastructure company now offers European institutional clients access to trading services that combine custody, execution and aggregated liquidity. BitGo Europe said the platform provides infrastructure for institutional participation in digital asset markets. The services target European institutions seeking regulated access to crypto trading through a single platform that integrates multiple functions including asset custody and trade execution. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/bitgo-regulated-trading-europe-bafin-approval/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 06:25
Solana Down 2.8% Despite Trending: What On-Chain Data Reveals About SOL

Solana Down 2.8% Despite Trending: What On-Chain Data Reveals About SOL

Solana captures market attention on February 18, 2026, not for gains but for unusual trading dynamics. Despite a 2.8% 24-hour decline to $82.84, SOL maintains its
Share
Blockchainmagazine2026/02/18 21:07