The article concludes that OTFS significantly outperforms OFDM by reducing channel training overhead, leveraging a more accurate delay–Doppler channel model, enabling efficient interpolation, and improving prediction in doubly-dispersive environments.The article concludes that OTFS significantly outperforms OFDM by reducing channel training overhead, leveraging a more accurate delay–Doppler channel model, enabling efficient interpolation, and improving prediction in doubly-dispersive environments.

Study Highlights Why OTFS Outperforms OFDM in Doubly-Dispersive Channels

2025/12/04 21:00
  • I. Abstract and Introduction
  • II. Related Work
  • III. Modeling of Mobile Channels
  • IV. Channel Discretization
  • V. Channel Interpolation and Extrapolation
  • VI. Numerical Evaluations
  • VII. Conclusions, Appendix, and References

VII. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we talked about the advantages of OTFS over OFDM in terms of spectral efficiency, resulting from the much reduced channel training overhead. We showed that the D-D domain channel model is also an approximation of the real channel, but it is more accurate then the LTI model, and thus allows us to estimate the channel with a much reduced channel estimation frequency. The predictability of the channel in T-F domain comes from the sparsity of response in D-D domain. Besides, we showed that it’s possible to use a very small amount of resources for channel interpolation. A pipeline algorithm is proposed for channel interpolation with reduced processing delay. Further more, we showed that channel extrapolation and data-aided channel tracking would be possible, benefiting from the predictability of the D-D domain channel. Two sources of channel interpolation error are unveiled: the D-D domain aliasing resulting from the finite TF window, and the ISCI induced by channel dispersion. Their impacts on channel estimation error are quantified. Overall, we can conclude that OTFS has a huge advantage over OFDM due to the reduced channel training overhead. As a matter of fact, this advantage actually comes from the D-D domain channel model itself, and is thus shared by other signaling techniques designed for doubly-dispersive channels.

APPENDIX A SUM OF sinc AND DIRICHLET FUNCTIONS

REFERENCES

[1] S. B. Weinstein, “The history of orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing [history of communications],” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, pp. 26–35, Nov. 2009.

\ [2] R. W. Chang, “Synthesis of band-limited orthogonal signals for multichannel data transmission,” The Bell Sys. Tech. J., vol. 45, pp. 1775– 1796, Dec. 1966.

\ [3] L. Cimini, “Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 33, pp. 665–675, July 1985.

\ [4] D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

\ [5] T. L. Marzetta, “Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, pp. 3590–3600, Nov. 2010.

\ [6] Y. Song, Z. Gong, C. Li, and Y. Chen, “Efficient channel estimation for wideband millimeter wave massive MIMO systems with beam squint,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, pp. 3421–3435, May 2022.

\ [7] Z. Gong, C. Li, and F. Jiang, “Pilot decontamination in noncooperative massive MIMO cellular networks based on spatial filtering,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, pp. 1419–1433, Feb. 2019.

\ [8] E. Dahlman, S. Parkvall, and J. Skold, 5G NR: The next generation wireless access technology. Academic Press, 2020.

\ [9] T. Dean, M. Chowdhury, and A. Goldsmith, “A new modulation technique for Doppler compensation in frequency-dispersive channels,” in 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1–7, 2017.

\ [10] T. R. Dean, M. Chowdhury, N. Grimwood, and A. J. Goldsmith, “Rethinking modulation and detection for high Doppler channels,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 19, pp. 3629–3642, June 2020.

\ [11] T. Wang, J. Proakis, E. Masry, and J. Zeidler, “Performance degradation of OFDM systems due to Doppler spreading,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 5, pp. 1422–1432, June 2006.

\ [12] A. Monk, R. Hadani, M. Tsatsanis, and S. Rakib, “OTFS-orthogonal time frequency space,” 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02993, Aug. 2016.

\ [13] R. Hadani, S. Rakib, M. Tsatsanis, A. Monk, A. J. Goldsmith, A. F. Molisch, and R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” in 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6, 2017.

\ [14] R. Hadani and A. Monk, “OTFS: A new generation of modulation addressing the challenges of 5G.” Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802. 02623, 2018. arXiv:1802.02623 [cs.IT].

\ [15] A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, pp. 8214–8229, Nov. 2023.

\ [16] X. Ouyang and J. Zhao, “Orthogonal chirp division multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, pp. 3946–3957, Sept. 2016.

\ [17] M. S. Omar and X. Ma, “Performance analysis of OCDM for wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, pp. 4032– 4043, July 2021.

\ [18] H. Lin and J. Yuan, “Orthogonal delay-doppler division multiplexing modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 11024–11037, Dec. 2022.

\ [19] M. K. Ramachandran, G. D. Surabhi, and A. Chockalingam, “OTFS: A new modulation scheme for high-mobility use cases,” Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, vol. 100, pp. 315 – 336, April 2020.

\ [20] H. B. Mishra, P. Singh, A. K. Prasad, and R. Budhiraja, “OTFS channel estimation and data detection designs with superimposed pilots,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 2258–2274, Sept. 2022.

\ [21] P. Raviteja, K. T. Phan, and Y. Hong, “Embedded pilot-aided channel estimation for OTFS in delay-Doppler channels,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 68, pp. 4906–4917, May 2019.

\ [22] R. Hadani, S. Rakib, A. F. Molisch, C. Ibars, A. Monk, M. Tsatsanis, J. Delfeld, A. Goldsmith, and R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation for millimeter-wave communications systems,” in 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), pp. 681–683, 2017.

\ [23] R. Hadani, S. Rakib, S. Kons, M. Tsatsanis, A. Monk, C. Ibars, J. Delfeld, Y. Hebron, A. J. Goldsmith, A. F. Molisch, and A. R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” CoRR, vol. abs/1808.00519, 2018.

\ [24] X.-G. Xia, “Comments on “the transmitted signals of OTFS and VOFDM are the same”,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 11252–11252, Dec. 2022.

\ [25] X.-G. Xia, “Precoded and vector OFDM robust to channel spectral nulls and with reduced cyclic prefix length in single transmit antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 49, pp. 1363–1374, Aug. 2001.

\ [26] P. Raviteja, E. Viterbo, and Y. Hong, “OTFS performance on static multipath channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 745–748, June 2019.

\ [27] A. Sayeed and B. Aazhang, “Joint multipath-Doppler diversity in mobile wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 47, pp. 123–132, Jan. 1999.

\ [28] X. Ma and G. Giannakis, “Maximum-diversity transmissions over doubly selective wireless channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, pp. 1832–1840, July 2003.

\ [29] Y. Ma, G. Ma, B. Ai, D. Fei, N. Wang, Z. Zhong, and J. Yuan, “Characteristics of channel spreading function and performance of OTFS in high-speed railway,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 22, pp. 7038–7054, Oct. 2023.

\ [30] G. D. Surabhi, R. M. Augustine, and A. Chockalingam, “On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 18, pp. 3049–3063, June 2019.

\ [31] R. M. Augustine, G. D. Surabhi, and A. Chockalingam, “Space-time coded OTFS modulation in high-Doppler channels,” in 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Spring), pp. 1–6, 2019.

\ [32] S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam, and R. Calderbank, “OTFS-a mathematical foundation for communication and radar sensing in the delay-Doppler domain,” IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine, vol. 2, pp. 36–55, Nov. 2022.

\ [33] S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam, and R. Calderbank, “OTFS-predictability in the delay-Doppler domain and its value to communication and radar sensing.” arXiv:2302.08705 [eess.SP], Feb. 2023.

\ [34] W. Shen, L. Dai, J. An, P. Fan, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation for orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) massive MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, pp. 4204–4217, Aug. 2019.

\ [35] W. Shen, L. Dai, S. Han, I. Chih-Lin, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation for orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) massive MIMO,” in ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), (Shanghai, China), pp. 1–6, 2019.

\ [36] D. Shi, W. Wang, L. You, X. Song, Y. Hong, X. Gao, and G. Fettweis, “Deterministic pilot design and channel estimation for downlink massive MIMO-OTFS systems in presence of the fractional Doppler,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 20, pp. 7151–7165, Nov. 2021.

\ [37] Y. Liu, S. Zhang, F. Gao, J. Ma, and X. Wang, “Uplink-aided high mobility downlink channel estimation over massive MIMO-OTFS system,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, pp. 1994–2009, Sept. 2020.

\ [38] M. Kollengode Ramachandran and A. Chockalingam, “MIMO-OTFS in high-Doppler fading channels: Signal detection and channel estimation,” in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 206–212, 2018.

\ [39] L. Gaudio, G. Caire, and G. Colavolpe, “On achievable rate of OFDM and OTFS in the presence of sparsity,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), (Montreal, QC, Canada), pp. 1–6, June 2021.

\ [40] L. Gaudio, G. Colavolpe, and G. Caire, “OTFS vs. OFDM in the presence of sparsity: A fair comparison,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 4410–4423, June 2022.

\ [41] S. K. Mohammed, “Derivation of OTFS modulation from first principles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, pp. 7619–7636, Aug. 2021.

\ [42] S. K. Mohammed, “Time-domain to delay-Doppler domain conversion of OTFS signals in very high mobility scenarios,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, pp. 6178–6183, June 2021.

\ [43] P. Bello, “Characterization of randomly time-variant linear channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun. Sys., vol. 11, pp. 360–393, Dec. 1963.

\ [44] Z. Gong, F. Jiang, C. Li, and X. Shen, “Simultaneous localization and communications with massive MIMO-OTFS,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, pp. 3908–3924, Dec. 2023.

\ [45] K. Liu, T. Kadous, and A. Sayeed, “Orthogonal time-frequency signaling over doubly dispersive channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, pp. 2583–2603, Nov. 2004.

\ [46] K. Grochenig, “Foundations of time-frequency analysis,” in ¨ Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, 2000. [47] Z. Gong, “Fast signal interpolation through zero-padding and FFT/IFFT.” arXiv:2407.06502 [eess.SP], 2024.

\

:::info Authors:

(1) Zijun Gong, Member, IEEE;

(2) Fan Jiang, Member, IEEE;

(3) Yuhui Song, Student Member, IEEE;

(4) Cheng Li, Senior Member, IEEE;

(5) Xiaofeng Tao, Senior Member, IEEE.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ethereum unveils roadmap focusing on scaling, interoperability, and security at Japan Dev Conference

Ethereum unveils roadmap focusing on scaling, interoperability, and security at Japan Dev Conference

The post Ethereum unveils roadmap focusing on scaling, interoperability, and security at Japan Dev Conference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Ethereum’s new roadmap was presented by Vitalik Buterin at the Japan Dev Conference. Short-term priorities include Layer 1 scaling and raising gas limits to enhance transaction throughput. Vitalik Buterin presented Ethereum’s development roadmap at the Japan Dev Conference today, outlining the blockchain platform’s priorities across multiple timeframes. The short-term goals focus on scaling solutions and increasing Layer 1 gas limits to improve transaction capacity. Mid-term objectives target enhanced cross-Layer 2 interoperability and faster network responsiveness to create a more seamless user experience across different scaling solutions. The long-term vision emphasizes building a secure, simple, quantum-resistant, and formally verified minimalist Ethereum network. This approach aims to future-proof the platform against emerging technological threats while maintaining its core functionality. The roadmap presentation comes as Ethereum continues to compete with other blockchain platforms for market share in the smart contract and decentralized application space. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/ethereum-roadmap-scaling-interoperability-security-japan/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:25
Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield

Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield

The post Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Botanix Labs has launched stBTC, a liquid staking token designed to turn Bitcoin into a yield-bearing asset by redistributing network gas fees directly to users. The protocol will begin yield accrual later this week, with its Genesis Vault scheduled to open on Sept. 25, capped at 50 BTC. The initiative marks one of the first attempts to generate Bitcoin-native yield without relying on inflationary token models or centralized custodians. stBTC works by allowing users to deposit Bitcoin into Botanix’s permissionless smart contract, receiving stBTC tokens that represent their share of the staking vault. As transactions occur, 50% of Botanix network gas fees, paid in BTC, flow back to stBTC holders. Over time, the value of stBTC increases relative to BTC, enabling users to redeem their original deposit plus yield. Botanix estimates early returns could reach 20–50% annually before stabilizing around 6–8%, a level similar to Ethereum staking but fully denominated in Bitcoin. Botanix says that security audits have been completed by Spearbit and Sigma Prime, and the protocol is built on the EIP-4626 vault standard, which also underpins Ethereum-based staking products. The company’s Spiderchain architecture, operated by 16 independent entities including Galaxy, Alchemy, and Fireblocks, secures the network. If adoption grows, Botanix argues the system could make Bitcoin a productive, composable asset for decentralized finance, while reinforcing network consensus. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/botanix-launches-stbtc
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:37