Dockerized Azure Functions often fail with 401 errors because the container cannot access file-based secret storage. The fix is to switch to blob-based secret storage, keep the container stateless, and let Azure handle key decryption. This restores authentication without breaking your build.Dockerized Azure Functions often fail with 401 errors because the container cannot access file-based secret storage. The fix is to switch to blob-based secret storage, keep the container stateless, and let Azure handle key decryption. This restores authentication without breaking your build.

How to Fix 401 Unauthorized Errors in Dockerized Azure Functions

2025/12/08 21:45
5 min read

The Problem

You’ve deployed an Azure Function using Docker to production, everything looks good, but when you try to call your function endpoint, you get a frustrating 401 Unauthorized error:

curl -X POST \ "https://my-prod-functions.azurewebsites.net/api/MyFunction?code=my-function-key" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" # Response: 401 Unauthorized

Meanwhile, your non-dockerized development environment works perfectly with the exact same code and keys. What’s going on?

The Investigation

Step 1: Rule Out the Obvious

First, I checked all the usual suspects:

  • Function keys were correct (copied from Portal → Functions → Function Keys)
  • No App Service Authentication enabled
  • No IP restrictions
  • CORS configured properly
  • Authorization level set to AuthorizationLevel.Function in my code.

Step 2: Check the Logs

Application Insights revealed something interesting:

Request successfully matched the route with name 'MyFunction' and template 'api/MyFunction' Executing StatusCodeResult, setting HTTP status code 401

The request was reaching the function and matching the route, but Azure was returning 401 before the code even executed. This meant the issue was at the Azure Functions runtime authentication layer, not in my code.

Step 3: The Critical Discovery

I inspected the environment variables via Kudu console (https://my-functions.scm.azurewebsites.net) and found:

AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = files WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = false # I THOUGHT THIS IS THE PROBLEM!

The Root Cause

Here’s what was happening:

How Azure Functions Stores Keys

Azure Functions can store authentication keys in two ways:

  1. File-based storage (AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = files)
  • Keys stored as JSON files in /home/data/Functions/secrets/
  • Requires persistent file system access
  • Default for non-containerized apps
  1. Blob-based storage (AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = blob)
  • Keys stored in Azure Blob Storage
  • No file system dependency
  • Recommended for Docker containers

The Docker Conflict

When you set WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = false (common for stateless Docker containers), Azure does not mount persistent storage to your container.

This means:

  • Your function keys exist in Azure’s storage
  • But your container cannot access them
  • Authentication always fails with 401

Let me verify this in the container:

# SSH into container or via Kudu ls -la /home/data/ # Result: No such file or directory ls -la /azure-functions-host/Secrets/ #Result: No such file or directory

The secrets directory didn’t exist because storage wasn’t mounted!

The Secondary Issue

When I initially tried to fix this by setting WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = true, authentication worked but I got 404 Not Found instead!

\ Why? Because mounting Azure’s persistent storage at /home/site/wwwroot/ overwrote my Docker container’s application files. The mounted directory only had host.json but no compiled DLLs (in the docker container, not the host container it is very important to keep that in mind there are two containers here the host container and the app docker container) so Azure Functions runtime finds 0 functions to load so When a request comes in Authentication works (keys in blob) but Function not found so we get 404.In short, this option makes the host find the function key files (so authentication works) but loses the functions themselves. We cant use it and WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE needs to be false.

The Solution

The correct fix for Dockerized Azure Functions is to use blob-based secret storage:

Step 1: Change Secret Storage Type

In Azure Portal:

  1. Go to your Function App
  2. Navigate to ConfigurationApplication Settings
  3. Find or add: AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType
  4. Set value to: blob
  5. Ensure: WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE is false

Step 2: Save and Restart

Click Save, then restart the function app. Azure will automatically:

  • Create a azure-webjobs-secrets container in your storage account
  • Migrate existing keys to blob storage
  • Configure the runtime to read from blobs

Step 3: Get Your Keys

Go to Portal → Function App → Functions → [Your Function] → Function Keys

Copy the key from the Portal (this is the decrypted version).

Step 4: Test

curl -X POST \ "https://my-prod-functions.azurewebsites.net/api/MyFunction?code=<KEY_FROM_PORTAL>" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"test": "data"}' # Response: 200 OK

Understanding Key Encryption

When you check blob storage, you’ll see keys stored like this:

{ "keys": [ { "name": "default", "value": "CfDJ8AAAAAAA...encrypted-value...", "encrypted": true } ] }

Important: You cannot use this encrypted value directly! Azure automatically:

  1. Stores keys encrypted in blob storage (for security)
  2. Decrypts them at runtime using machine keys
  3. Validates incoming requests against decrypted values

Always get your keys from the Azure Portal UI, which shows the decrypted version.

Complete Configuration Reference

Dockerfile (Example)

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/dotnet:4 AS base WORKDIR /home/site/wwwroot EXPOSE 80 FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0 AS build WORKDIR /src COPY ["MyFunction/MyFunction.csproj", "MyFunction/"] RUN dotnet restore "MyFunction/MyFunction.csproj" COPY . . WORKDIR "/src/MyFunction" RUN dotnet build "MyFunction.csproj" -c Release -o /app/build FROM build AS publish RUN dotnet publish "MyFunction.csproj" -c Release -o /app/publish FROM base AS final WORKDIR /home/site/wwwroot COPY --from=publish /app/publish . ENV AzureWebJobsScriptRoot=/home/site/wwwroot \ AzureFunctionsJobHost__Logging__Console__IsEnabled=true

\

Required App Settings

# Secret storage configuration AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = blob AzureWebJobsStorage = <your-storage-connection-string> # Docker configuration WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE = false WEBSITE_RUN_FROM_PACKAGE = 0 # Functions runtime FUNCTIONS_WORKER_RUNTIME = dotnet FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION = ~4

Why This Happens

This issue is specific to Docker + Azure Functions because:

  1. Docker containers should be stateless and immutable
  2. File-based secrets require mounted persistent storage
  3. Mounting storage can overwrite containerized application files
  4. The solution is using blob storage, which is stateless-friendly

Non-dockerized function apps don’t have this problem because they naturally have access to the App Service file system.

Summary

Problem: Dockerized Azure Functions return 401 when using file-based secret storage without mounted volumes.

Solution: Use blob-based secret storage, which is stateless and Docker-friendly.

Key Settings:

AzureWebJobsSecretStorageType = blob WEBSITESENABLEAPPSERVICESTORAGE = false

This configuration allows your Docker container to remain stateless while still securely accessing authentication keys from Azure Blob Storage.


Troubleshooting a similar issue? Feel free to reach out in the comments below!

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10
SHIB Price Analysis for February 8

SHIB Price Analysis for February 8

The post SHIB Price Analysis for February 8 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Original U.Today article Can traders expect SHIB to test the $0.0000070 range soon
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/09 00:26
Solana’s Long-Term Upside Tied to Upgrades, Short-Term Structure Still Weak

Solana’s Long-Term Upside Tied to Upgrades, Short-Term Structure Still Weak

Solana remains caught between strong long-term fundamentals and a fragile short-term technical structure. While the network’s upgrade roadmap points to meaningful
Share
Coinstats2026/02/09 00:28