Strategy is pressing MSCI to treat bitcoin treasury companies neutrally in its indexes while CEO Phong Le warns that restricting passive exposure now would repeatStrategy is pressing MSCI to treat bitcoin treasury companies neutrally in its indexes while CEO Phong Le warns that restricting passive exposure now would repeat

Strategy Takes on MSCI as $60T Bitcoin Credit Thesis Collides With MSTR Cycle Signal

2025/12/12 20:30

Strategy is pressing MSCI to treat bitcoin treasury companies neutrally in its indexes while CEO Phong Le warns that restricting passive exposure now would repeat past mistakes made with earlier infrastructure booms. At the same time, a widely shared MSTR chart maps a repeating 474-day pattern that traders use to frame potential price targets into 2026.

Strategy Urges Neutral MSCI Standards for Digital Asset Treasury Firms

Strategy said it has submitted a formal response to MSCI’s consultation on how to treat digital asset treasury companies in its indexes. The firm argued that index standards should stay neutral, apply consistently across issuers, and reflect how global markets are evolving toward digital assets.

In its letter, Strategy called on MSCI to avoid penalizing companies that hold Bitcoin or other digital assets as part of their corporate treasury strategy. Instead, it asked the index provider to maintain rules that focus on transparent disclosures and comparable treatment across sectors.

The company also invited investors and industry participants to read the submission and share their support through its website, saying broader feedback can help shape how digital asset treasury firms appear in major benchmarks.

Strategy CEO Phong Le Frames MSCI Debate as Barrier to Broad Digital Credit Growth

Strategy CEO Phong Le told Schwab Network that restricting passive index investment in bitcoin now would echo past policy missteps that held back transformational technologies. He said excluding digital-asset treasuries from major indexes is “misinformed and misguided,” and risks stifling market innovation at a time when global digital credit could grow toward a $60 trillion opportunity.

Le compared MSCI’s proposal to bar companies with large bitcoin holdings from passive benchmarks to past efforts that would have blocked investment in oil and oil rigs in the early 1900s, spectrum and cell towers in the 1980s, or computing and data centers in the 2000s. He argued that picking winners and losers too early can slow adoption of foundational technologies.

He also defended Strategy’s corporate structure, saying digital-asset treasury companies should be viewed as operating firms, not funds, and that indexes should treat them consistently with other sectors. The MSCI consultation runs through Dec. 31, with any changes expected in early 2026. 

MSTR Chart Flags Repeating 474-Day Pattern With 2026 Price Targets

Meanwhile, a chart shared by trader Ryan Hogue plots Strategy’s MSTR share price inside a rising channel and marks three equal spans of 474 days between major inflection points. The first interval runs from the early 2021 peak to the start of 2023, while the second stretches into late November 2024. Now the chart projects a third 474-day window that extends to mid-October 2026.

MSTR Long Term Cycle Projection. Source: Ryan HogueWithin that structure, Hogue draws several parallel trendlines that frame the recent rally and extend them forward to estimate possible levels if the pattern holds. The projected band places MSTR near about 1,360 dollars on the lower line, 1,900 dollars in the middle, and roughly 2,775 dollars at the upper boundary by October 2026. The current price action, highlighted on the right side of the chart, tracks along the channel after a sharp advance, suggesting that bulls see previous cycle behavior as a rough template for the next phase.

Market Opportunity
Shiba Inu Treat Logo
Shiba Inu Treat Price(TREAT)
$0.0008112
$0.0008112$0.0008112
+1.34%
USD
Shiba Inu Treat (TREAT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41