Tether’s €1.1bn Juventus bid was rejected by the Agnellis, highlighting a clash between crypto capital and a century-old football dynasty. The post Crypto vs DynastyTether’s €1.1bn Juventus bid was rejected by the Agnellis, highlighting a clash between crypto capital and a century-old football dynasty. The post Crypto vs Dynasty

Crypto vs Dynasty: Tether’s €1.1B Juventus Bid Sparks Showdown With the Agnellis

2025/12/15 13:01
  • Tether made a €1.1 billion all-cash bid for control of Juventus, offering a 21% premium and pledging a further €1 billion in funding.
  • Exor and the Agnelli family unanimously rejected the proposal, insisting the club is not for sale.
  • The standoff comes as Juventus faces prolonged sporting and financial struggles despite its historic status.

Tether’s attempted takeover of Juventus has been dismissed by the Agnelli family, setting up a high-profile clash between a rapidly expanding crypto business and one of Italy’s most established industrial lineages.

The crypto firm submitted an all-cash proposal to the family’s holding company, Exor, seeking to acquire its 65.4% controlling stake in Juventus at a price of €2.66 (AU$4.70) per share, valuing the club at around €1.1 billion (AU$1.94). According to reports, the offer represented a premium of roughly 21% over Juventus’ market price at the close of trading on Friday.

Tether also pledged an additional €1 billion (AU$1.77) in future investment and indicated that it would pursue a public tender offer for the remaining shares at the same valuation if the deal proceeded.

Exor rejected the bid unanimously, stating that it had no intention of selling Juventus to Tether or to any other potential buyer.

Exor chief executive John Elkann underlined the family’s attachment to the club, stating: “Juventus, our history and our values are not for sale,” while reaffirming long-term support for the team and its management.

Related: Sei Labs Strikes Wallet Deal With Xiaomi

Mounting Sporting Challenges

Juventus has endured a prolonged period of difficulty in recent seasons, failing to recapture the dominance of its nine consecutive Serie A titles that concluded in 2020 and currently sitting seventh in the league table. 

The club’s financial position has weakened, posting no annual net profit for almost a decade and its share price has gone down 27% so far this year. These pressures have been compounded by off-field setbacks, including a 10-point deduction imposed in 2023 following an investigation into the accounting treatment of player transfers.

Tether has steadily built its presence at Juventus, accumulating more than a 10% stake during 2025 and becoming the club’s second-largest shareholder behind Exor.

Founded in 2014, Tether issues the USDT stablecoin and reported profits exceeding US$10 billion (AU$15.4 billion) in the first nine months of 2025, supported by reserves of approximately US$181 billion (AU$279 billion). 

Despite the financial scale of Tether’s proposal, Exor’s response signals that Juventus remains a cultural and symbolic asset for the Agnelli family, outweighing the immediate appeal of a premium cash offer.

Related: J.P. Morgan Brings Onchain Debt to Solana

The post Crypto vs Dynasty: Tether’s €1.1B Juventus Bid Sparks Showdown With the Agnellis appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41