The post Bitcoin Near $89K as Wintermute, CME Gap, Support Clash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin traded around $88,600 to $89,800 on Dec. 15 as socialThe post Bitcoin Near $89K as Wintermute, CME Gap, Support Clash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin traded around $88,600 to $89,800 on Dec. 15 as social

Bitcoin Near $89K as Wintermute, CME Gap, Support Clash

2025/12/16 05:49

Bitcoin traded around $88,600 to $89,800 on Dec. 15 as social media posts pointed to Wintermute linked transfers, a mostly filled CME gap, and a daily uptrend support test that some traders said could decide the next move.

Price action showed BTC down about 1.68% near $88,629 on the BTC USDT pair, while CME futures traded near $89,780 after an early gap narrowed, and the daily chart held just above a rising support line that analysts warned could expose $80,000 if it breaks.

Wintermute linked BTC transfers draw attention as Bitcoin trades near $88,630

Claims about Wintermute “dumping” Bitcoin spread on X on Monday after an account said the market maker had sold $1.5 billion in BTC and continued selling every few minutes. The post did not provide independently verifiable evidence for the dollar figure.

BTC USDT 1 hour price chart. Source: Binance / x

Bitcoin traded near $88,629 on the BTC USDT pair, down about 1.68% at the time of the update. The session range showed a 24 hour high near $90,472 and a 24 hour low near $88,497, according to Binance.

Onchain labeling data also showed multiple BTC transfers associated with Wintermute tagged wallets moving to exchange linked destinations, including wallets labeled for Binance, Bitstamp, OKX, and KuCoin, according to Arkham. However, those transfers alone do not confirm market sales, since market makers also move coins for inventory management, settlement, and liquidity operations

Bitcoin CME gap narrows after early session move, analyst says

Bitcoin’s CME futures opened with a fresh gap that “most has been closed straight away,” according to trader Daan Crypto Trades in a Dec. 15 post on X.

Bitcoin CME Futures 15 minute chart CME Gap. Source: Daan Crypto Trades via X

On the 15 minute CME futures chart, BTC traded near $89,780 after printing an open around $89,990, a high near $90,035, and a low near $89,775, with the session showing a $180 move lower, or about 0.20%, on the label shown.

The chart marked the remaining gap area as a narrow zone around $90,200 to $90,400, and the analyst said what remained looked “pretty negligible,” adding that the gap did not appear to be a major focus for the week.

Bitcoin tests rising support near $89,000 as chart flags $80,000 retest risk

Meanwhile, Bitcoin traded near $88,935 on the daily BTC USDT chart as price pressed against a rising support line that has held since the late November rebound, according to a TradingView graphic shared by analyst Ted, known as @TedPillows, on X.

BTC USDT 1 day chart. Source: TradingView, Ted via X

The chart shows BTC sliding from the $120,000 to $124,000 area in October into a broader downtrend, then shifting into a tighter range from late November. Price action formed higher lows along an upward sloping trendline, while repeated rallies stalled near a flat resistance band around $95,000, creating a wedge like structure on the daily timeframe.

Ted said the zone is “crucial” because a break below the rising trend support could open the door to another move toward $80,000. The chart’s prior swing low from late November also sits just above that area, which makes $80,000 to $84,000 the next visible demand zone if support gives way, while $92,000 and $95,000 remain the closer levels to reclaim on any rebound.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13128/bitcoin-whipsaws-near-89-k-as-wintermute-transfer-claims-and-cme-gap-talk-collide

Market Opportunity
NEAR Logo
NEAR Price(NEAR)
$1.528
$1.528$1.528
-0.39%
USD
NEAR (NEAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41