The post ‘Nonsense’: Satoshi Associate Shuts Down Quantum Threat Claims Around Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Te latest quantum scare around BitcoinThe post ‘Nonsense’: Satoshi Associate Shuts Down Quantum Threat Claims Around Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Te latest quantum scare around Bitcoin

‘Nonsense’: Satoshi Associate Shuts Down Quantum Threat Claims Around Bitcoin

Te latest quantum scare around Bitcoin fell apart almost as fast as it appeared. Adam Back, one of the first people associated with Bitcoin’s beginnings, openly ended claims that the price of the cryptocurrency should already be 30% lower because of an upcoming quantum break made by another prominent Bitcoin opinion maker, Charles Edwards. For Back, though, it is nothing more than “nonsense.”

The thesis of Edwards is simple as it this — Bitcoin might be broken by quantum computers in three years, and the market should probably give it a 34% discount right away. His case is based on expert surveys, projected timelines and the idea that elliptic curve cryptography would suddenly fail by 2028 with no time to react. 

Back disagrees, and his counterarguments are well known too. First of all, Bitcoin is not protected the same way banks protect data. It uses digital signatures instead of traditional encryption, and post-quantum signature systems are already out there. NIST wrapped up SLH-DSA in 2024, and Bitcoin can switch to quantum-secure signatures without locking funds or rebuilding the whole protocol.

Back has said a bunch of times that quantum readiness is a software upgrade path, not a sudden do-or-die event. Taproot, scripting upgrades and flexible signature rules already support a phased transition well before any real threat appears.

Bitcoin vs. time

What Back basically says is that even if we are super optimistic, it will be years before we have large-scale quantum machines that can withstand failures. If these systems are implemented, banks, governments and global internet security would face pressure first — not Bitcoin holders alone.

You Might Also Like

The real issue is not ignoring quantum research, as Back says, but pushing artificial urgency. Bitcoin has time, tools and a history of cryptographic upgrades. If you treat distant hardware theory like a quick price cut, it just shows that you are focused on short-term trading instead of the actual risks involved in the protocol.

Source: https://u.today/nonsense-satoshi-associate-shuts-down-quantum-threat-claims-around-bitcoin

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.003175
$0.003175$0.003175
-0.15%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.