The city government of Makati, for one, once a top spender of confidential funds in the NCR, reports no confidential expenses for 2024, reversing its 2023 totalThe city government of Makati, for one, once a top spender of confidential funds in the NCR, reports no confidential expenses for 2024, reversing its 2023 total

Half of NCR cities stop using confidential funds, spending drops 35% in 2024

2025/12/19 09:17

MANILA, Philippines – Half of the 16 cities in the National Capital Region (NCR) stopped spending confidential funds in 2024, a shift which contributed to a 35% drop in total regional expenditures, from P748.49 million in 2023 to P483.93 million.

One is the city government of Makati which used to be one of the top spenders of confidential funds among local governments in the NCR. But in 2024, it reported no confidential expenses, a reversal from the previous year when it led the list with P240 million. 

The local government of Malabon City took a similar step, eliminating all cash advances for confidential funds despite spending P13.7 million in 2023. 

Must Read

[Ask The Tax Whiz] How do confidential funds work?

Makati and Malabon now join Pasig, Las Piñas, Mandaluyong, Navotas, Taguig, and Valenzuela in avoiding confidential fund expenses in what is seen as a shift intended to promote greater transparency in local budget use. 

But eight NCR city governments – Manila, Pasay, Quezon City, Caloocan, Parañaque, Muntinlupa, Marikina, and San Juan – continued to use confidential funds in their operations. 

Manila reported P120 million in both 2023 and 2024, while Pasay City maintained P80 million in both years. 

Quezon City spent P100 million in 2023 and P75 million in 2024; Caloocan City recorded P60 million in 2023 and P70.5 million in 2024; and Parañaque City remained at P49.5 million in both years.

Muntinlupa City increased its spending slightly, from P44.29 million in 2023 to P47.93 million in 2024. Marikina City and San Juan City kept their confidential fund expenses steady at P25 million and P16 million, respectively, for both years.

Confidential spending by government offices came under intense scrutiny in 2023 after records showed Vice President Sara Duterte spent P125 million in just 11 days in December 2022, even though the 2022 national budget had no allocation for such expenses.

Civil society groups on December 12 filed a plunder complaint against Duterte, accusing her of misusing P612.5 million in confidential funds as vice president and education secretary.

Davao City, where she once served as mayor, had seen a surge in confidential spending during her watch. Its annual confidential expenses rose from P144 million in 2016 to P293 million in 2017 and climbed again to P420 million in 2018.

By the end of her mayorship in 2022, Davao City had allocated over P2.6 billion to confidential expenses, surpassing the spending of wealthier cities such as Makati, Manila, Quezon City, and Cebu City.

Duterte had faced impeachment after a congressional inquiry revealed that hundreds of millions in confidential funds under the Office of the Vice President and the Department of Education, which she once headed, were released under questionable circumstances. She refused to explain before Congress how such funds were used.

On August 8, 2024, the Commission on Audit (COA) issued a notice of disallowance against P73 million in OVP confidential expenses in 2022, citing failure to provide proof of proper use.

Based on Joint Circular No. 2015-01, issued by the COA, the Department of Budget and Management, the Department of the Interior and Local Government, the Department of National Defense, and the Governance Commission for GOCCs, local government confidential spending must be related to peace and order programs.

The circular limits eligible activities to crime prevention and law enforcement, training and capability development for law enforcement personnel and volunteers, and programs addressing illegal drugs, illegal gambling, insurgency, smuggling, human trafficking, illegal fishing, and unlicensed mining and logging. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0,01733
$0,01733$0,01733
+0,69%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21