The post Gnosis confirms hard fork to recover funds lost in Balancer hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gnosis Chain has confirmed that it has executed aThe post Gnosis confirms hard fork to recover funds lost in Balancer hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gnosis Chain has confirmed that it has executed a

Gnosis confirms hard fork to recover funds lost in Balancer hack

Gnosis Chain has confirmed that it has executed a hard fork to recover approximately $9.4 million in funds frozen following the November 2025 Balancer V2 exploit. The hard fork activated on December 22, 2025, and the announcement came the next day via the official Gnosis Chain account. 

According to the official announcement posted on Gnosis Chain’s X page, the hard fork has been activated, and the funds are no longer within the hacker’s control. To ensure consensus, the post also urged all remaining node operators to take action to avoid penalties.

The decision to rewrite the blockchain’s recent history to make users whole was touted as a solution, but it has exposed fault lines over governance and precedent on Gnosis Chain.

Gnosis Chain initiates a hard fork

According to a governance forum post, Philippe Schommers, Gnosis’ head of infrastructure, floated the idea that the network would need to undergo a hard fork on December 12. According to Schommers, this would help return funds frozen during the recent exploit of the DeFi protocol Balancer.

The hard fork was scheduled to go live on December 22.

Schommers wrote to nodes that fail to follow the chain with a majority of stake that they will face penalties. He said the team was focused on returning user funds by Christmas.

The move was framed as a technical “rescue mission,” but the announcement sparked a heated debate in the project’s community over who gets to decide when a blockchain’s immutability can be broken.

At the time, Schommers called the surrounding debate “an important one and, as always, we welcome all contributions.” He also emphasized that the hard fork depends on Gnosis Chain validators to go through.

“As it stands, our validators have a choice to exercise their collective power transparently, to protect users, even as we work toward a future where no one has that power at all,” he said.

Schommers also countered fears of the update affecting the chain’s immutability. “The hard fork requires relatively minor changes that do not affect chain history – and therefore do not affect fundamental immutability, which stands at the core of our ethos,” he said.

Why is Gnosis Chain going through a hard fork?

Balancer, an established decentralized exchange and automated market maker protocol, was targeted in November when an attacker exploited a vulnerability to siphon $128 million from Balancer V2 liquidity pools across multiple chains.

Harry Donnelly, founder and CEO of Circuit, has tagged Balancer’s breach “a serious warning” for the DeFi ecosystem. According to Donelly, the target was “one of the most trusted names in the space” and “an early pioneer with a culture of compliance, backed by rigorous audits and open disclosure.”

In response to the exploit, validators approved a soft fork that restricted bridge movements, freezing $9.4 million of the stolen assets on-chain. Recovering those funds required a hard fork, which is what triggered debates on the network’s commitment to immutability.

There have been mixed reactions to the move, with the camp split over how to interpret it.  Lefteris Karapetsas, the founder of Rotki, a privacy-focused portfolio tracker, claimed the move reflects accountability rather than centralization.

“The coordinated soft fork and the clear plan toward a hard fork show that Gnosis Chain takes security, users, and ecosystem responsibility seriously,” wrote Karapetsas.

Others have claimed it sets a dangerous future precedent and have demanded formal rules to govern future interventions.

A user under the alias TheVoidFreak noted in their forum response that accepting a hard fork requires “a strict framework that no one can deviate from,” arguing that without it, violations of “Code is law” and immutability would have unmanaged consequences.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days – normally $100/mo.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/gnosis-hard-fork-to-recover-funds/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02112
$0.02112$0.02112
+1.24%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
IOTA Enhances Interoperability With Native BTC Bridge

IOTA Enhances Interoperability With Native BTC Bridge

The integration enables users to mint iBTC via the IOTA Vault, consolidating native BTC, liquid staking tokens, and wrapped BTC. Partnerships with IOTA’s stablecoin protocol Virtue and other ecosystem players will allow iBTC holders to mint $VUSD and access lending, staking, and other DeFi opportunities. Echo Protocol, the Bitcoin liquidity and aggregation infrastructure platform, now [...]]]>
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/09/18 22:05
Banco Santander Launches Retail Crypto Trading via Openbank in Germany

Banco Santander Launches Retail Crypto Trading via Openbank in Germany

TLDR Banco Santander has launched retail crypto trading through its online bank, Openbank. German customers can now trade Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin, Polygon, and Cardano on Openbank. The service will expand to Spanish clients in the coming weeks and include more tokens. Openbank charges a 1.49% fee per transaction, with no custody fees involved. Banco Santander [...] The post Banco Santander Launches Retail Crypto Trading via Openbank in Germany appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 02:56