The post Bitcoin ETFs Update: Daily Net Outflows Hit $188.64M as IBIT Leads Losses appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR IBIT and FBTC combined for $172.64MThe post Bitcoin ETFs Update: Daily Net Outflows Hit $188.64M as IBIT Leads Losses appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR IBIT and FBTC combined for $172.64M

Bitcoin ETFs Update: Daily Net Outflows Hit $188.64M as IBIT Leads Losses

TLDR

  • IBIT and FBTC combined for $172.64M in outflows, making up the bulk of the -$188.64M net daily outflow on Dec. 23.
  • Total cumulative net inflows across all Bitcoin ETFs remained high at $57.08B, showing continued long-term investment interest.
  • Grayscale’s GBTC ETF was the only fund with a negative cumulative inflow, standing at -$25.15B despite $14.55B in assets.
  • Several mid-tier ETFs like ARKB, HODL, BTCW, and DEFI posted no inflows or outflows, reflecting a pause in investor movement.
  • Total net assets across Bitcoin ETFs reached $114.29B, with $3.16B traded during the day, indicating active market participation.

According to a recent SoSoValue update as of December 23, the total daily net inflow across Bitcoin ETFs stood at -$188.64 million, reflecting capital outflows. Despite this, the cumulative net inflow remained strong at $57.08 billion, showing long-term investor interest. The total value traded on the day was $3.16 billion, while total net assets across the ETFs reached $114.29 billion.

IBIT and FBTC Bitcoin ETFs Post Combined $172M Outflow

Tracking the market performance of the individual Bitcoin ETFs, BlackRock’s IBIT ETF recorded the highest net outflow at $157.34 million, losing 1.79K BTC in a single day. However, IBIT still held the largest cumulative net inflow at $62.34 billion and led net assets with $67.90 billion. It maintained a 3.88% share of the Bitcoin ETF market with a market price of $49.65.

Source: SoSoValue (Bitcoin ETFs)

Fidelity’s FBTC ETF saw a daily net outflow of $15.30 million, equivalent to 174.27 BTC in losses. Its cumulative net inflow stood at $12.19 billion, with net assets valued at $17.77 billion. FBTC’s market share was 1.02% and traded at a price of $76.34.

Grayscale’s GBTC and BITB Record Outflows While Spot BTC ETF Holds Steady

Grayscale’s GBTC ETF recorded a $10.28 million net outflow and lost 117.06 BTC on the day. It remained the only ETF with a negative cumulative net inflow at -$25.15 billion. GBTC’s net assets totaled $14.55 billion with a market price of $68.50 and a 0.83% BTC share.

Grayscale’s spot BTC ETF registered no inflows or outflows, keeping its cumulative net inflow at $1.95 billion. It held $4.25 billion in net assets and traded at $38.79 per share with a 0.24% BTC share. The ETF had a daily value traded of $96.65 million.

Bitwise’s BITB ETF posted a net outflow of $5.72 million and lost 65.21 BTC on the day. It reported $2.13 billion in cumulative net inflows and $3.39 billion in net assets. The ETF’s share of the BTC market stood at 0.19% with a trading price of $47.61.

Mid-Tier Bitcoin ETFs Steady as Inflows Pause

Ark Invest’s ARKB ETF had no net inflows or outflows and kept its net assets at $3.30 billion. VanEck’s HODL ETF also had no inflows, holding steady at $1.10 billion in net assets. Invesco’s BTCO ETF posted a positive cumulative net inflow of $215.55 million and traded at $87.30.

Franklin’s EZBC ETF held $512.88 million in net assets and posted a daily trading volume of 273.17K shares. Valkyrie’s BRRR ETF followed with $506.42 million in net assets and 198.39K in daily share volume. WisdomTree’s BTCW ETF had $44.83 million in net assets, with no net inflows or outflows.

Hashdex’s DEFI ETF also posted no daily inflow or outflow and remained at -$1.45 million cumulative net inflow. Its net assets stood at $11.91 million with a market price of $99.28. Most Bitcoin ETFs experienced negative price changes, ranging between -0.67% and -0.88%, reflecting broad market pressure.

The post Bitcoin ETFs Update: Daily Net Outflows Hit $188.64M as IBIT Leads Losses appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/bitcoin-etfs-update-daily-net-outflows-hit-188-64m-as-ibit-leads-losses/

Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0.005005
$0.005005$0.005005
-2.64%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41