The post Crypto crowd turns on Strategy and Michael Saylor appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto traders’ concerns about Strategy center on how aggressivelyThe post Crypto crowd turns on Strategy and Michael Saylor appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto traders’ concerns about Strategy center on how aggressively

Crypto crowd turns on Strategy and Michael Saylor

Crypto traders’ concerns about Strategy center on how aggressively the company has borrowed money to buy Bitcoin weekly. Over the years, Strategy issued large amounts of convertible debt and other loans to stack more BTC. 

Strategy performed well during bull markets; however, it makes people nervous during price drops. Crypto investors worry that the company could face pressure from debt obligations, higher interest costs, or refinancing risks. 

Data shows that since Bitcoin’s all-time high in July, Strategy (MSTR) stock has plummeted approximately 65% from $456 to $158 per share.

Saylor’s BTC publicity puts Strategy in trouble

Over time, Strategy’s identity has become more and more tied to Bitcoin itself. Under Michael Saylor, the company has evolved into a more Bitcoin-centric entity, rather than a traditional software business. Traders are concerned about whether the core software revenue is strong enough to support the company if Bitcoin enters a long bear market. 

When Bitcoin’s price swings more, investors on X and Reddit often speculate about the worst-case situations, such as having to sell Bitcoin or having shareholders lose money, even though these things don’t always happen.

The company also appears to be having cold feet. As reported by Cryptopolitan, this week Strategy achieved a weekly raise, but this time dedicated the funds to its USD reserve instead of Bitcoin. Strategy added 748M to its reserve, bringing the total to $2.19B. 

The decision to stop buying BTC and raise the USD reserve was aimed to ease refinancing and dividend stress in the short term. It also to directly address worries about forced Bitcoin sales.

Odds of Strategy becoming the worst-performing company on the Nasdaq 100. Source: Polymarket

The looming MSCI index decision has added to the anxiety. Recently, Polymarket showed that 61% of traders believed that Strategy would be delisted by March 31 from the MSCI index. The company is also ranked second as the worst performer among the Nasdaq 100.

Saylor claims that Bitcoin is a living network that can adapt when needed. If quantum computing ever becomes powerful enough to threaten current security methods, Bitcoin developers and users would respond by upgrading the network. 

There is also a growing distrust of powerful figures in crypto and finance, particularly during this two-and-a-half-month downturn. Saylor’s influence is also decreasing. Some people worry that Saylor’s influence encourages others to take risks they don’t fully understand. 

Bitcoin investors increase long positions

Bitcoin is still stable today, with a small drop of almost 1% after a time of tumultuous trading. The dip comes after $952 million was taken out of crypto funds by institutions. This includes $460 million from Bitcoin alone, which is due to worries about regulatory delays and the possibility of whales selling more.

At the start of the week, Bitcoin ETFs saw $142 million in outflows. The Bitcoin ETF market cap, on the other hand, is still strong at $114.99 billion. Then, the $111 million surge in Solana and XRP inflows shows that institutional investors are moving into other assets as Bitcoin’s price dips.

Meanwhile, perpetual futures are showing increasing long positions. The open interest rose by 2% to 310,000 BTC, which is approximately $27 billion. The funding rate has hit 0.09%, the highest in two weeks. 

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/crypto-crowd-turns-on-strategy-saylor/

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.004576
$0.004576$0.004576
+25.47%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41