Bitcoin’s active growth trend, measured by the 365‑day moving average, has fallen to its lowest level in six years, according to on‑chain data. The metric highlights a prolonged slowdown in new network participation and address activity growth, even as Bitcoin trades within a mature, institutionally influenced market.Bitcoin’s active growth trend, measured by the 365‑day moving average, has fallen to its lowest level in six years, according to on‑chain data. The metric highlights a prolonged slowdown in new network participation and address activity growth, even as Bitcoin trades within a mature, institutionally influenced market.

Bitcoin Active Growth Trend Hits 6‑Year Low on 365‑Day Moving Average

2025/12/26 17:16
News Brief
Bitcoin’s active growth trend, measured by the 365‑day moving average, has fallen to its lowest level in six years, according to on‑chain data. The metric highlights a prolonged slowdown in new network participation and address activity growth, even as Bitcoin trades within a mature, institutionally influenced market.

Bitcoin’s active growth trend, measured by the 365‑day moving average, has fallen to its lowest level in six years, according to on‑chain data. The metric highlights a prolonged slowdown in new network participation and address activity growth, even as Bitcoin trades within a mature, institutionally influenced market.

What the Metric Measures

The active growth trend tracks the rate of change in active addresses over time. By smoothing it with a 365‑day moving average, analysts filter out short‑term noise to observe structural adoption trends rather than daily fluctuations.

A six‑year low indicates that net new address growth is expanding more slowly than at any point since the previous cycle’s late‑stage consolidation.

On‑chain data sources:
https://glassnode.com/
https://cryptoquant.com/

Why Active Growth Is Slowing

Several structural factors help explain the decline:

  • Network maturity: Bitcoin adoption is increasingly driven by large holders and institutions rather than waves of new retail users.
  • Custodial aggregation: ETFs, custodians, and exchanges consolidate activity into fewer on‑chain addresses, reducing visible growth despite rising capital.
  • Layered exposure: Many participants gain BTC exposure via ETFs, derivatives, or custodial products without creating new on‑chain addresses.

In short, capital inflows no longer map one‑to‑one with address growth.

Historical Context

Historically, low active growth readings have appeared during:

  • Late bear‑market phases
  • Early institutional accumulation periods
  • Pre‑expansion phases where supply is absorbed quietly

In past cycles, similar conditions often preceded volatility expansion, though not necessarily immediate price appreciation.

Not Necessarily Bearish

While slowing active growth may appear concerning at first glance, analysts caution that it does not automatically imply weakening demand. Instead, it reflects Bitcoin’s transition from a retail‑driven adoption curve to a capital‑weighted, institution‑driven network.

In previous cycles, strong price trends have occurred even as active growth remained subdued, particularly when long‑term holders were accumulating and liquid supply was tightening.

What to Watch Next

Key indicators to monitor alongside active growth include:

  • Long‑term holder supply changes
  • Exchange balances and illiquid supply
  • ETF inflows and custody concentration
  • On‑chain velocity and realized cap metrics

Together, these provide a clearer picture of whether Bitcoin is consolidating for expansion or entering a period of demand stagnation.

Conclusion

Bitcoin’s active growth trend hitting a six‑year low underscores a structural shift in how adoption occurs. The network is no longer expanding primarily through new retail addresses, but through deeper capital deployment by fewer, larger participants.

Whether this marks a pause before the next expansion—or a longer period of consolidation—will depend less on new addresses and more on how much capital is willing to hold Bitcoin at current levels.

Market Opportunity
SIX Logo
SIX Price(SIX)
$0.01108
$0.01108$0.01108
+0.18%
USD
SIX (SIX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Ozak AI’s $5M Presale Momentum Points Toward a Powerful Post-Listing Breakout — Forecasts Show $5–$10 Targets Within Reach

Ozak AI’s $5M Presale Momentum Points Toward a Powerful Post-Listing Breakout — Forecasts Show $5–$10 Targets Within Reach

As the extensive crypto market is fighting hard with volatility, the project that has continued to surge with unstoppable strength is Ozak AI ($OZ). The official
Share
Coinstats2025/12/27 06:30
Koscom Pursues Korean Won Stablecoin with 5 Trademark Applications

Koscom Pursues Korean Won Stablecoin with 5 Trademark Applications

Detail: https://coincu.com/news/koscom-korean-won-stablecoin-trademark/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 18:39