If we genuinely want blockchain to usher in a better financial future, we must ensure stablecoins remain tools of openness, freedom, and choice.If we genuinely want blockchain to usher in a better financial future, we must ensure stablecoins remain tools of openness, freedom, and choice.

Circle’s stablecoin monopoly could be the next Visa, and that’s not a compliment | Opinion

2025/07/08 16:37
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Circle is rapidly cementing itself as the dominant force in the regulated stablecoin market, leveraging early regulatory alignment and powerful partnerships with payment titans such as Shopify, Mastercard, and Visa. To many observers, this signals mainstream success—evidence that crypto is finally gaining institutional legitimacy. 

Beneath the surface of this victory lies a troubling reality.

Circle’s USD Coin (USDC) is quietly positioning itself to disintermediate Visa and Mastercard, complete with all the network fees, restrictions, and monopolistic pitfalls that crypto was designed to escape.

Circle’s path to dominance

Stablecoins offer a critical alternative to traditional payments, enabling users, particularly those in emerging economies, to sidestep onerous exchange rates and transaction fees and preserve purchasing power against volatile national currencies. Circle’s increasingly dominant position risks undermining the very advantages stablecoins once promised, converting a decentralized dream into a centralized reality.

The pathway Circle has chosen is strategic and admirable in most respects. Early regulatory engagement in the United States and proactive compliance have enabled Circle to position USDC as the ‘trusted’ stablecoin among financial institutions, regulators, and mainstream consumers alike. 

It’s the stablecoin that banks can feel comfortable with, exchanges list confidently, and fintech apps eagerly integrate. Recent partnerships with global payment giants further deepen this entrenchment, embedding USDC into international payment networks and nurturing its dominance. USDC has become ubiquitous across DeFi platforms and is quickly leveraging partnerships to become just as prevalent in mainstream finance.

Do we need multiple stablecoins?

Stablecoins should offer five essential attributes: speed, affordability, ease of use, consumer safety, and scalability. They present a unique conundrum: on a fundamental level, stablecoins appear largely interchangeable—each holds identical value and similar basic functionality (though they are not fungible between different issuers). 

From a typical user’s perspective, having multiple stablecoins available might seem redundant, as market consolidation around a single fungible stablecoin can unlock economies of scale and reduce friction. Yet beneath the surface, stablecoins differ meaningfully in transaction fees, settlement times, ease of use, programmability, and accessibility. 

These differences underscore why some competition among stablecoin issuers is critical. Without competition driving providers to lower fees and optimize performance, a dominant issuer like Circle can dictate market terms to its advantage, ultimately leaving consumers with higher costs, slower transfers, and reduced choice.

Without robust incentives or competitive market forces, there’s little to ensure that more than one stablecoin issuer can remain viable. This lack of healthy competition creates the perfect conditions for monopolistic power, where a single entity like Circle gains the authority and leverage similar to credit card networks, capable of imposing unavoidable transaction fees across all stablecoin payment transactions.

While an endless buffet of stablecoins to choose from can create unintended friction for users, the alternative, a single dominant issuer that can impose practically any fees it wishes, will have far worse consequences for users. It’s essential that multiple high-quality stablecoins remain viable to prevent an unfair monopoly.

The danger of centralization and ubiquity

Centralizing control of stablecoin payment channels, Circle is setting the stage for a new era of unavoidable transaction fees—fees remarkably similar to those imposed by traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. Merchants and consumers, once hopeful about crypto’s potential to disrupt fee-heavy traditional finance, may soon find themselves subject to similar tolls on stablecoin usage. 

In this emerging scenario, Circle—not governments or open blockchain protocols—dictates terms, conditions, and costs. The risk of rent-seeking behavior, extracting incremental revenue at every payment checkpoint, becomes increasingly real.

Visa and Mastercard currently dominate the global payment landscape, together collecting billions in network and interchange fees annually—fees that act as an invisible tax on global commerce. A stablecoin monopoly, particularly one held by a private issuer like Circle, creates a similar dynamic in the blockchain space. Users and merchants adopting USDC could eventually have little choice but to accept Circle’s conditions or be shut out of essential financial networks.

A restaurant can’t simply stop accepting Visa without damaging the customer experience and losing sales. USDC is quickly approaching that same level of ubiquity, and if alternative stablecoins disappear, any fees Circle imposes will become just as unavoidable.

A call for openness and competition

Proponents of Circle’s strategy often argue that regulatory compliance and mainstream integration are necessary for the mass adoption of stablecoins. To an extent, this is true. The crypto ecosystem needs legitimacy, trust, and clear legal frameworks to attract mainstream participation. However, compliance and legitimacy should never come at the expense of openness, decentralization, and choice. It’s possible—and preferable—to have both.

Ultimately, regulators, users, and crypto advocates must demand openness and competition. Regulators should promote policies that enable multiple stablecoin models to flourish, not just one. Merchants and users should embrace alternatives to dominant stablecoins like USDC, signaling to Circle and others that stablecoin adoption must not come at the cost of monopolistic pricing or restrictive terms. And the broader crypto community should advocate for protocols and standards that maintain open, interoperable, and decentralized stablecoin infrastructures.

While it’s tempting to cheer Circle’s rise as crypto’s long-awaited mainstream breakthrough, a future where stablecoins become yet another omnipresent tollbooth on digital commerce is hardly worth celebrating. If we genuinely want blockchain technology to usher in a better financial future, we must ensure stablecoins remain tools of openness, freedom, and choice, not just another unavoidable fee at the checkout.

Ron Tarter
Ron Tarter

Ron Tarter is the CEO of MNEE, a gasless, low-fee stablecoin designed to make digital dollars more accessible and usable worldwide.

Market Opportunity
FREEdom Coin Logo
FREEdom Coin Price(FREEDOM)
$0.0000000331
$0.0000000331$0.0000000331
+5.75%
USD
FREEdom Coin (FREEDOM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Edges higher ahead of BoC-Fed policy outcome

Edges higher ahead of BoC-Fed policy outcome

The post Edges higher ahead of BoC-Fed policy outcome appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/CAD gains marginally to near 1.3760 ahead of monetary policy announcements by the Fed and the BoC. Both the Fed and the BoC are expected to lower interest rates. USD/CAD forms a Head and Shoulder chart pattern. The USD/CAD pair ticks up to near 1.3760 during the late European session on Wednesday. The Loonie pair gains marginally ahead of monetary policy outcomes by the Bank of Canada (BoC) and the Federal Reserve (Fed) during New York trading hours. Both the BoC and the Fed are expected to cut interest rates amid mounting labor market conditions in their respective economies. Inflationary pressures in the Canadian economy have cooled down, emerging as another reason behind the BoC’s dovish expectations. However, the Fed is expected to start the monetary-easing campaign despite the United States (US) inflation remaining higher. Investors will closely monitor press conferences from both Fed Chair Jerome Powell and BoC Governor Tiff Macklem to get cues about whether there will be more interest rate cuts in the remainder of the year. According to analysts from Barclays, the Fed’s latest median projections for interest rates are likely to call for three interest rate cuts by 2025. Ahead of the Fed’s monetary policy, the US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback’s value against six major currencies, holds onto Tuesday’s losses near 96.60. USD/CAD forms a Head and Shoulder chart pattern, which indicates a bearish reversal. The neckline of the above-mentioned chart pattern is plotted near 1.3715. The near-term trend of the pair remains bearish as it stays below the 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), which trades around 1.3800. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) slides to near 40.00. A fresh bearish momentum would emerge if the RSI falls below that level. Going forward, the asset could slide towards the round level of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:23
Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now

Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now

The post Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email. As a crypto writer, Krishi splits his time between decoding the chaos of the markets and writing about it in a way that doesn’t put you to sleep. He’s been at it for nearly two years in the crypto trenches. Yes, he regrets missing the magnificent rallies that came before that (who doesn’t!), but he’s more than ready to put his money where his words are. Before diving headfirst into crypto, Krishi spent over five years writing for some of the biggest names in tech, including TechRadar, Tom’s Guide, and PC Gaming, covering everything from gadgets and cybersecurity to gaming and software. When he’s not scouring and writing about the latest happenings in crypto, Krishi trades the forex market while keeping crypto in his long-term HODL plans. He’s a Bitcoin believer, though he never lets that bias creep into his writing. This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy. I Agree Source: https://bitcoinist.com/crypto-supercycle-2025-best-altcoins-to-buy-now-deepseek/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:45
Bitcoin Price Analysis: What’s Next for BTC After Tanking to $66K?

Bitcoin Price Analysis: What’s Next for BTC After Tanking to $66K?

BTC has entered a phase of consolidation after a sharp decline from January highs near $100k. The price action shows that BTC has been respecting a broad ascending
Share
CryptoPotato2026/04/02 22:27

$30,000 in PRL + 15,000 USDT

$30,000 in PRL + 15,000 USDT$30,000 in PRL + 15,000 USDT

Deposit & trade PRL to boost your rewards!