Ethereum price fell toward $2,200 after another wave of selling, with rising volume and weak momentum keeping traders on the defensive. At the time of writing, Ethereum price fell toward $2,200 after another wave of selling, with rising volume and weak momentum keeping traders on the defensive. At the time of writing,

Ethereum price enters high-risk zone below $2.3K as network activity surges – further decline ahead?

2026/02/04 16:57
3 min read

Ethereum price fell toward $2,200 after another wave of selling, with rising volume and weak momentum keeping traders on the defensive.

Summary
  • Ethereum continued to slide as traders reduced risk exposure.
  • Futures data showed rising activity but falling confidence.
  • Technical signals point to limited upside without a strong rebound.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was trading at $2,264, a 2.8% decline over the previous day, further sinking into a vulnerable range. This drop comes after a steep sell-off that has caused ETH to drop across all significant time periods. 

Ethereum (ETH) has fluctuated between $2,120 and $3,034 over the last week, but the trend has been decisively downward. In total, ETH has lost 24% in the past seven days and 28% over the last month, now sitting roughly 54% below its all-time high of $4,946 reached in August 2025.

Trading activity has increased as prices dropped. Ethereum recorded $47.25 billion in spot trading volume over the last 24 hours, up 21%.

Derivatives markets showed a similar pattern. CoinGlass data shows futures volume climbed 38% to $105 billion, while open interest slipped 1.18% to $27 billion. This suggests traders are trimming exposure rather than adding fresh leverage.

On-chain activity raises caution flags

On-chain data has drawn fresh attention. A Feb. 4 report from CryptoQuant contributor CryptoOnchain showed Ethereum’s transfer count, measured using a 14-day moving average, rising to about 1.17 million.

These kinds of spikes have often surfaced during times of increased market stress. Both Jan. 2018 and May 2021 saw similar spikes, which were followed by steep price drops.

While higher transaction counts can signal strong network use, sudden spikes are also linked to large-scale repositioning and distribution during uncertain market phases.

The current data does not confirm a market top. Still, it places Ethereum in a zone where downside risk has historically increased, especially when price momentum is already weak.

Ethereum price technical analysis

From a chart perspective, Ethereum remains locked in a daily downtrend. Lower highs and lower lows have continued to form since the price failed near the $4,000 region. No clear break in structure has yet been established.

Ethereum price enters high-risk zone below $2.3K as network activity surges – further decline ahead? - 1

Repeated pullbacks from the mid-Bollinger Band have reinforced selling pressure. Every rebound attempt has so far run into resistance near the 20-day moving average, with upside momentum fading quickly after each move. This pattern suggests that sellers are still in charge of short-term price movement.

Additionally, Ethereum has fallen below the lower Bollinger Band, indicating an increase in downside volatility. Rather than marking exhaustion, the move suggests that selling pressure is still active within the broader downtrend.

The loss of the $3,000 level has further weakened the structure. Although the price briefly returned above the zone, ETH was unable to hold, and the zone flipped into resistance. Momentum is still muted with the daily relative strength index in the low 30s and minimal signs of a long-term recovery.

A modest recovery could develop if selling slows and price holds above the $2,150–$2,200 area.  However, a more meaningful shift in sentiment would require ETH to reclaim $2,300 and move toward the $2,700–$2,800 range. Without a daily close above those levels, upside attempts are likely to remain shallow and short-lived.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15