Traditional risk-weightings and models cannot account for crypto's high volatility or market behavior, according to a Federal Reserve paper.New analysis publishedTraditional risk-weightings and models cannot account for crypto's high volatility or market behavior, according to a Federal Reserve paper.New analysis published

Fed paper proposes initial margin weights for crypto-linked derivatives

2026/02/13 06:05
1 min read

Traditional risk-weightings and models cannot account for crypto's high volatility or market behavior, according to a Federal Reserve paper.

New analysis published Wednesday by the Federal Reserve proposes that crypto be categorized as a distinct asset class for initial margin requirements used in “uncleared” derivatives markets, including over-the-counter trades and other transactions that do not pass through a centralized clearinghouse.

Fed paper proposes initial margin weights for crypto-linked derivatives

The working paper said that is because crypto is more volatile than traditional asset classes and does not fit into the risk categories outlined in the Standardized Initial Margin Model (SIMM) that classifies asset classes.

These include interest rates, equities, foreign exchange and commodities, according to authors Anna Amirdjanova, David Lynch and Anni Zheng.

Read more

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003939
$0.0003939$0.0003939
+0.17%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.