Former assistant U.S. Attorney Elie Honig burst Republicans’ bubble regarding their claim that President Donald Trump is exonerated from crimes connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
“The … claim that U.S. Rep. [James] Comer (R-Kent.) is making is that Bill Clinton somehow exonerated Donald Trump in his testimony today. Again, we'll have to see that transcript. But people are misusing and overusing this phrase ‘exonerate,’” said Honig to CNN anchor Jake Tapper, speaking of claims from the former president that he did not know Epstein was involved in sex-trafficking underage victims.
“I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong,” Clinton told lawmakers today during interviews.
“There's no way Bill Clinton would be able to exonerate Donald Trump,” Honig pointed out. “At most, he would be able to say, ‘I don't know of Donald Trump doing anything wrong,’ but that's not universal global exoneration.”
Tapper pointed out that Comer and Republicans also asserted today that Epstein’s survivors had exonerated Donald Trump.
“Just to be crystal clear about this, the victims or survivors haven't exonerated anybody. They've made it very clear that they're afraid of naming names because they'll be sued or physically threatened and so they're waiting for the justice department to do that job, not them,” reported Tapper. “… [T]hey've exonerated zero people. And obviously that includes Donald Trump. Do you agree with that?”
“Yeah. ‘Exoneration’ means you're clearing this person for all purposes and for all time,” assured Honig, who served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York. “If any victim says, ‘I never saw Donald Trump, I never saw him do anything bad,’ okay, that victim doesn't know anything about Donald Trump or name-your-person. But we are collectively way overusing this phrase ‘exoneration.’ That's not what ‘exoneration’ means.
- YouTube youtu.be



A total of 167 workdays have passed since Trump’s inauguration — though David Sacks’ team reportedly insists he has been cautious not to exceed his limit. A spokesperson for US AI and crypto czar David Sacks has refuted the idea that he may have breached his 130-day limit as a special government employee, following scrutiny from several US lawmakers.The spokesperson for Sacks told CNBC on Wednesday that he carefully manages his SGE days to ensure that he stays under the limit and that those days don’t have to be in a row.It comes after Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and other US lawmakers questioned whether Sacks exceeded the number of days under his short-term federal appointment. Read more