TLDR NASA is considering Starship for lunar orbit transfer in future Artemis missions. The proposal could reduce Boeing’s role in the Space Launch System programTLDR NASA is considering Starship for lunar orbit transfer in future Artemis missions. The proposal could reduce Boeing’s role in the Space Launch System program

NASA Considers Starship For Artemis Lunar Transfer As Boeing Role May Shrink

2026/03/20 22:44
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR

  • NASA is considering Starship for lunar orbit transfer in future Artemis missions.
  • The proposal could reduce Boeing’s role in the Space Launch System program.
  • Orion would still remain part of the mission for astronaut return to Earth.
  • Rising SLS costs and schedule delays are driving NASA’s review of mission plans.
  • Starship would carry added responsibility despite pending full mission demonstrations.

NASA is considering a major change to its Artemis moon program. The agency may give SpaceX’s Starship a larger mission role while reducing Boeing’s work on the Space Launch System.

The possible change would alter how astronauts travel toward the moon. Under the new approach, Starship could help move Orion from Earth orbit to lunar orbit. That step was earlier tied to Boeing’s SLS in the current mission design.

NASA reviews a new Artemis mission structure

NASA is reviewing whether Starship can take over more of the transport work in Artemis missions. Bloomberg reported that Starship could dock with Orion in Earth orbit and then push it toward lunar orbit. This would shift a major task away from Boeing’s SLS.

Under the current Artemis plan, SLS launches Orion and sends it on a path toward the moon. Orion then meets a Starship lander near lunar orbit for the descent phase. The revised plan would give Starship a wider role in both transfer and landing operations.

NASA has not announced a final decision on the change. Agency officials are expected to discuss the proposal with Boeing, SpaceX, and Blue Origin. The plan may still change because it could face political review and contractor concerns.

The review comes as NASA tries to keep Artemis on track. The program has faced repeated schedule pressure, and mission costs have remained high. Early Artemis flights are estimated to cost more than $4 billion each.

Boeing’s role may shrink as NASA looks for flexibility

Boeing has played a central role in Artemis through the Space Launch System. SLS has long been the main launch vehicle for Orion under NASA’s deep space plans. A change in mission structure could reduce Boeing’s direct role in sending crews toward the moon.

The shift would not remove Orion from the Artemis program. Orion would still be needed to bring astronauts back to Earth. But its propulsion limits and the pace of SLS development have pushed NASA to study other options.

NASA’s interest in a revised plan reflects wider pressure across the program. Artemis has faced delays linked to hardware readiness, testing, and launch preparation. Those issues have increased focus on systems that may support a more flexible mission design.

Market reaction showed immediate attention to the report. Boeing shares fell on Thursday after the news emerged. The stock later recovered and ended near flat in post-market trading at about $201.18.

SpaceX gains a larger role but risk remains

SpaceX already has a major place in Artemis through its lunar lander work. A broader transport role would expand that position and place Starship closer to the center of future moon missions. That would mark a clear shift in NASA’s contractor balance.

The new plan would also place more mission risk on Starship. SpaceX has not yet completed a fully successful end-to-end orbital Starship mission. That record may shape NASA’s final view as it weighs mission timing and crew safety.

Even so, NASA appears willing to consider a wider use of reusable systems. The agency is under pressure to control costs and keep its lunar schedule moving. That pressure is shaping talks about how Artemis missions should be built in the years ahead.

For now, the agency is weighing whether a larger Starship role can support its moon plans more effectively. Any final move would reshape responsibilities across Artemis and reduce Boeing’s place in a mission architecture it helped build

The post NASA Considers Starship For Artemis Lunar Transfer As Boeing Role May Shrink appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Spacecoin Logo
Spacecoin Price(SPACE)
$0.00677
$0.00677$0.00677
-1.45%
USD
Spacecoin (SPACE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12
XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

The post XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP Builds Multi-Year Base as Whales Accumulate and Volume
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/21 00:04