The post Firas Modad: The political system is rigged by corporate interests, Iran’s nuclear concessions reshape negotiations, and Israel’s strategy aims for regionalThe post Firas Modad: The political system is rigged by corporate interests, Iran’s nuclear concessions reshape negotiations, and Israel’s strategy aims for regional

Firas Modad: The political system is rigged by corporate interests, Iran’s nuclear concessions reshape negotiations, and Israel’s strategy aims for regional dysfunction

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com


Iran’s uranium reduction and missile focus shift Middle East power dynamics, impacting global energy markets.

Key takeaways

  • Political decision-making is often controlled by a small group of shareholders, not elected officials.
  • Iran has significantly reduced its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, aligning with nuclear negotiation concessions.
  • Israel’s primary concern with Iran is its ballistic missile capabilities, not just nuclear issues.
  • Israel perceives the Iranian regime as an existential threat and aims to weaken regional adversaries.
  • Israel prefers to be surrounded by weak, dysfunctional states to minimize threats.
  • Historical use of radical Sunni groups against enemies has led to domestic repercussions.
  • Engaging in Middle Eastern conflicts could destabilize the region and increase terrorism risks.
  • Political leaders often promise restrained foreign policies but follow aggressive strategies.
  • Influential donors and political connections drive US foreign policy decisions.
  • The ongoing conflict could potentially destabilize the current energy system.
  • Iran’s actions in the energy sector could have severe repercussions on global markets.
  • The cyclical nature of using radical groups in warfare highlights repeated geopolitical strategies.
  • There is a systemic issue in governance where corporate interests intersect with politics.
  • The geopolitical landscape is heavily influenced by military capabilities and strategic threats.
  • Foreign intervention in the Middle East has significant implications for national security.

Guest intro

Firas Modad is founder of Modad Geopolitics and a Middle East political and security analyst serving clients in security, finance, insurance, media, and investment. He specializes in regional conflicts including the Iran-Turkey-Saudi rivalry, US-led versus Chinese-Russian geopolitical confrontations, and the economic impacts of Middle East wars on energy markets and global trade.

The rigged political system

  • — Firas Modad

  • Politicians are often not the true decision-makers; instead, major shareholders in defense contracting exert significant influence.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Understanding the intersection of politics and corporate interests is crucial for grasping governance issues.
  • The influence of major shareholders highlights systemic issues in political accountability.
  • This dynamic creates a disconnect between public expectations and actual policy decisions.
  • The oligarchic nature of the system undermines democratic principles.
  • A critical examination of political influence is necessary for meaningful reform.

Iran’s nuclear concessions

  • Iran has made significant concessions regarding its nuclear program.
  • — Firas Modad

  • The reduction of enriched uranium stockpile is a key point in nuclear negotiations.
  • Understanding uranium enrichment levels is essential for assessing nuclear capabilities.
  • These concessions are critical to the dynamics of international negotiations.
  • Iran’s actions reflect a willingness to engage diplomatically on nuclear issues.
  • The focus remains on ensuring compliance with international nuclear agreements.
  • The geopolitical implications of these concessions extend beyond nuclear capabilities.

Israel’s strategic posture

  • Israel views the Iranian regime as an existential threat.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Israel aims to weaken potential regional adversaries for security reasons.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Israel’s strategy involves maintaining regional stability through military and diplomatic means.
  • The perception of existential threats shapes Israel’s foreign policy objectives.
  • Israel’s preference for weak neighboring states minimizes potential threats.
  • Understanding Israel’s security strategy is key to analyzing Middle Eastern geopolitics.

The use of radical Sunni groups

  • Historical precedence exists for using radical Sunni groups against enemies.
  • — Firas Modad

  • This strategy has led to domestic repercussions in the past.
  • The cyclical nature of using radical groups highlights repeated geopolitical strategies.
  • Understanding the historical context of US involvement in the Middle East is crucial.
  • The use of radical groups often results in unintended consequences.
  • This approach reflects a pattern of foreign intervention with complex outcomes.
  • The implications of this strategy extend to regional stability and security.

Risks of Middle Eastern conflicts

  • Engaging in another Middle Eastern conflict could destabilize the region.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Such conflicts increase the risk of terrorism returning to Western shores.
  • The potential for regional destabilization has significant global implications.
  • Understanding US foreign policy is key to assessing these risks.
  • The consequences of foreign intervention resonate with national security concerns.
  • The cyclical nature of political promises versus actions in foreign policy is evident.
  • A critical perspective on foreign intervention highlights potential repercussions.

Influences on US foreign policy

  • Political leaders often promise restrained foreign policies but follow aggressive strategies.
  • — Firas Modad

  • A network of influential donors drives US foreign policy decisions.
  • — Firas Modad

  • The relationship between political figures and financial backers influences policy.
  • This dynamic highlights the power of financial interests in shaping foreign policy.
  • Understanding these influences is crucial for analyzing political accountability.
  • The cyclical nature of political rhetoric and actions is a recurring theme.

Energy system repercussions

  • The ongoing conflict could lead to a breakdown of the current energy system.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East impact global energy markets.
  • The potential destabilization of energy systems has significant economic implications.
  • Understanding these repercussions is crucial for assessing global market stability.
  • Iran’s actions in the energy sector could have severe global consequences.
  • The interconnectedness of energy markets highlights the importance of geopolitical stability.
  • The prediction of energy system breakdown underscores the stakes of ongoing conflicts.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Iran’s uranium reduction and missile focus shift Middle East power dynamics, impacting global energy markets.

Key takeaways

  • Political decision-making is often controlled by a small group of shareholders, not elected officials.
  • Iran has significantly reduced its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, aligning with nuclear negotiation concessions.
  • Israel’s primary concern with Iran is its ballistic missile capabilities, not just nuclear issues.
  • Israel perceives the Iranian regime as an existential threat and aims to weaken regional adversaries.
  • Israel prefers to be surrounded by weak, dysfunctional states to minimize threats.
  • Historical use of radical Sunni groups against enemies has led to domestic repercussions.
  • Engaging in Middle Eastern conflicts could destabilize the region and increase terrorism risks.
  • Political leaders often promise restrained foreign policies but follow aggressive strategies.
  • Influential donors and political connections drive US foreign policy decisions.
  • The ongoing conflict could potentially destabilize the current energy system.
  • Iran’s actions in the energy sector could have severe repercussions on global markets.
  • The cyclical nature of using radical groups in warfare highlights repeated geopolitical strategies.
  • There is a systemic issue in governance where corporate interests intersect with politics.
  • The geopolitical landscape is heavily influenced by military capabilities and strategic threats.
  • Foreign intervention in the Middle East has significant implications for national security.

Guest intro

Firas Modad is founder of Modad Geopolitics and a Middle East political and security analyst serving clients in security, finance, insurance, media, and investment. He specializes in regional conflicts including the Iran-Turkey-Saudi rivalry, US-led versus Chinese-Russian geopolitical confrontations, and the economic impacts of Middle East wars on energy markets and global trade.

The rigged political system

  • — Firas Modad

  • Politicians are often not the true decision-makers; instead, major shareholders in defense contracting exert significant influence.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Understanding the intersection of politics and corporate interests is crucial for grasping governance issues.
  • The influence of major shareholders highlights systemic issues in political accountability.
  • This dynamic creates a disconnect between public expectations and actual policy decisions.
  • The oligarchic nature of the system undermines democratic principles.
  • A critical examination of political influence is necessary for meaningful reform.

Iran’s nuclear concessions

  • Iran has made significant concessions regarding its nuclear program.
  • — Firas Modad

  • The reduction of enriched uranium stockpile is a key point in nuclear negotiations.
  • Understanding uranium enrichment levels is essential for assessing nuclear capabilities.
  • These concessions are critical to the dynamics of international negotiations.
  • Iran’s actions reflect a willingness to engage diplomatically on nuclear issues.
  • The focus remains on ensuring compliance with international nuclear agreements.
  • The geopolitical implications of these concessions extend beyond nuclear capabilities.

Israel’s strategic posture

  • Israel views the Iranian regime as an existential threat.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Israel aims to weaken potential regional adversaries for security reasons.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Israel’s strategy involves maintaining regional stability through military and diplomatic means.
  • The perception of existential threats shapes Israel’s foreign policy objectives.
  • Israel’s preference for weak neighboring states minimizes potential threats.
  • Understanding Israel’s security strategy is key to analyzing Middle Eastern geopolitics.

The use of radical Sunni groups

  • Historical precedence exists for using radical Sunni groups against enemies.
  • — Firas Modad

  • This strategy has led to domestic repercussions in the past.
  • The cyclical nature of using radical groups highlights repeated geopolitical strategies.
  • Understanding the historical context of US involvement in the Middle East is crucial.
  • The use of radical groups often results in unintended consequences.
  • This approach reflects a pattern of foreign intervention with complex outcomes.
  • The implications of this strategy extend to regional stability and security.

Risks of Middle Eastern conflicts

  • Engaging in another Middle Eastern conflict could destabilize the region.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Such conflicts increase the risk of terrorism returning to Western shores.
  • The potential for regional destabilization has significant global implications.
  • Understanding US foreign policy is key to assessing these risks.
  • The consequences of foreign intervention resonate with national security concerns.
  • The cyclical nature of political promises versus actions in foreign policy is evident.
  • A critical perspective on foreign intervention highlights potential repercussions.

Influences on US foreign policy

  • Political leaders often promise restrained foreign policies but follow aggressive strategies.
  • — Firas Modad

  • A network of influential donors drives US foreign policy decisions.
  • — Firas Modad

  • The relationship between political figures and financial backers influences policy.
  • This dynamic highlights the power of financial interests in shaping foreign policy.
  • Understanding these influences is crucial for analyzing political accountability.
  • The cyclical nature of political rhetoric and actions is a recurring theme.

Energy system repercussions

  • The ongoing conflict could lead to a breakdown of the current energy system.
  • — Firas Modad

  • Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East impact global energy markets.
  • The potential destabilization of energy systems has significant economic implications.
  • Understanding these repercussions is crucial for assessing global market stability.
  • Iran’s actions in the energy sector could have severe global consequences.
  • The interconnectedness of energy markets highlights the importance of geopolitical stability.
  • The prediction of energy system breakdown underscores the stakes of ongoing conflicts.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Loading more articles…

You’ve reached the end


Add us on Google

`;
}

function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `


${captionHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${createSocialShare()}

${authorHtml}
${displayDate}

${article.content}

${article.isPressRelease ? ” : article.isSponsored ? `

Disclosure: This is sponsored content. It does not represent Crypto Briefing’s editorial views. For more information, see our Editorial Policy.

` : `

Disclosure: This article was edited by ${article.editor}. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

`}

`;
}

function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `

${categoriesHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}

${captionHtml}

${article.content}
${article.isPressRelease ? ” : article.isSponsored ? `
Disclosure: This is sponsored content. It does not represent Crypto Briefing’s editorial views. For more information, see our Editorial Policy.

` : `

Disclosure: This article was edited by ${article.editor}. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

`}

`;
}

function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;

isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);

// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));

fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);

if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;

// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}

// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));

// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));

// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;

// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}

// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}

// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}

} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}

// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });

observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();

© Decentral Media and Crypto Briefing® 2026.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/firas-modad-the-political-system-is-rigged-by-corporate-interests-irans-nuclear-concessions-reshape-negotiations-and-israels-strategy-aims-for-regional-dysfunction-the-peter-mccormack-show/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003788
$0.0003788$0.0003788
-1.25%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

The post 3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Analyses and data indicate that the crypto market is experiencing its most active altcoin season since early 2025, with many altcoins outperforming Bitcoin. However, behind this excitement lies a paradox. Most retail investors remain uneasy as their portfolios show little to no profit. This article outlines the main reasons behind this situation. Altcoin Market Cap Rises but Dominance Shrinks Sponsored TradingView data shows that the TOTAL3 market cap (excluding BTC and ETH) reached a new high of over $1.1 trillion in September. Yet the share of OTHERS (excluding the top 10) has declined since 2022, now standing at just 8%. OTHERS Dominance And TOTAL3 Capitalization. Source: TradingView. In past cycles, such as 2017 and 2021, TOTAL3 and OTHERS.D rose together. That trend reflected capital flowing not only into large-cap altcoins but also into mid-cap and low-cap ones. The current divergence shows that capital is concentrated in stablecoins and a handful of top-10 altcoins such as SOL, XRP, BNB, DOG, HYPE, and LINK. Smaller altcoins receive far less liquidity, making it hard for their prices to return to levels where investors previously bought. This creates a situation where only a few win while most face losses. Retail investors also tend to diversify across many coins instead of adding size to top altcoins. That explains why many portfolios remain stagnant despite a broader market rally. Sponsored “Position sizing is everything. Many people hold 25–30 tokens at once. A 100x on a token that makes up only 1% of your portfolio won’t meaningfully change your life. It’s better to make a few high-conviction bets than to overdiversify,” analyst The DeFi Investor said. Altcoin Index Surges but Investor Sentiment Remains Cautious The Altcoin Season Index from Blockchain Center now stands at 80 points. This indicates that over 80% of the top 50 altcoins outperformed…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:43
New Crypto Investors Are Backing Layer Brett Over Dogecoin After Topping The Meme Coin Charts This Month

New Crypto Investors Are Backing Layer Brett Over Dogecoin After Topping The Meme Coin Charts This Month

Climbing to the top of the meme coin charts takes more than a viral mascot or celebrity tweets. Hype may spark attention, but only momentum, utility, and adaptability keep it alive. That’s why the latest debate among crypto enthusiasts is catching attention. While Dogecoin remains a household name, a new player has entered the arena […] The post New Crypto Investors Are Backing Layer Brett Over Dogecoin After Topping The Meme Coin Charts This Month appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/18 00:30
BitMine’s $11B Ethereum Bet — Smart Move or Risky Gamble Before the Next Bull Run?

BitMine’s $11B Ethereum Bet — Smart Move or Risky Gamble Before the Next Bull Run?

BitMine's massive $11 billion investment in Ethereum has raised eyebrows in the crypto world. As the market eagerly awaits the next bull run, this bold move has sparked debates and curiosity. Is it a clever strategy or a high-stakes risk? Explore which coins are poised for growth in this fluctuating landscape. Ethereum Poised for Growth Amid Steady Movement Source: tradingview  Ethereum's price is steady, moving between approximately $4335 and $4825. The crypto giant is showing promise, with a week's growth of over four percent. This follows a half-year surge of nearly 127 percent. Although the current pace is slower, the potential for breaking above the $5040 resistance level is strong. If it breaches this point, Ethereum could aim for the next resistance at $5530. Such a move would be a noticeable increase from today's range, suggesting this crypto could continue its climb. The market indicators point to a balanced phase, meaning Ethereum might be setting the stage for further growth. Keep an eye on those key levels! Conclusion BitMine’s move has sparked debate. If ETH rises, the valuation could be substantial. However, market trends can change quickly. Timing and strategy will be key. BitMine’s decision shows confidence in ETH, but only time will tell if it pays off. The sector awaits the next market movement with interest. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:44