A pair of industry voices argue that Web3 payment rails could redefine financial inclusion for women creators, offering a path around the gatekeeping that has longA pair of industry voices argue that Web3 payment rails could redefine financial inclusion for women creators, offering a path around the gatekeeping that has long

Web3 rails enable women creators to reclaim ownership

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Web3 Rails Enable Women Creators To Reclaim Ownership

A pair of industry voices argue that Web3 payment rails could redefine financial inclusion for women creators, offering a path around the gatekeeping that has long constrained access to banking and capital. In their view, crypto-based revenue infrastructure can turn creativity into a globally scalable, permissionless endeavor, especially for those in emerging markets who rely on online work as their primary income.

The authors contend that traditional finance underestimates or misclassifies the earnings of women creators—often treating them as non-standard income with limited collateral. They point to broader systemic barriers, including unequal venture-capital funding and credit scoring models, that continue to suppress women-led ventures. Axios data cited in the discussion notes that only a small share of 2024 VC funding went to female-founded companies, underscoring the kind of bias that persists in legacy finance.

Key takeaways

  • Legacy finance has historically undervalued women creators, with Axios reporting only 2.3% of 2024 venture capital funding going to female-founded companies.
  • Platform revenue models can act as gatekeepers, with claims that up to half of earnings can be siphoned off before reaching a creator’s wallet.
  • Smart contracts enable real-time, automatic revenue splits at the point of sale, potentially transforming how creators monetize collaborations and long-term value.
  • Stablecoins and cross-border crypto rails offer a borderless, permissionless payments backbone that can empower creators in volatile markets without bank gatekeeping.

From gatekeeping to programmable revenue

The piece frames a financing paradox: while the internet makes it possible for a Lagos-based creator to reach millions, cross-border payments still carry prohibitive fees, delays, and capital controls that erode a creator’s ability to sustain a business. The authors argue that the intersection of the creator economy with crypto payment infrastructure provides a genuine path to financial autonomy—one that doesn’t require prior permission from traditional gatekeepers.

In a world where code can handle the work traditionally performed by banks, the value created by a creator can flow more directly to their own wallet. The article points to smart contracts as a practical mechanism for distributing revenue instantly when a sale clears, rather than tying earnings to a later, platform-controlled payout schedule. In this view, programmable revenue unlocks a form of “participatory capitalism” where the success of the ecosystem benefits the people who built it, not just the platforms that host it.

For context, the piece notes that platforms historically charged significant take rates and fees before creators ever saw funds. While the exact figures vary across marketplaces, the broader argument is that platform tolls have too often eaten into earnings, leaving creators dependent on the terms set by a handful of intermediaries.

On-chain royalties and the end of Net-90

The authors argue that smart contracts can reimagine how royalties work in digital art, music, and other creative outputs. Rather than relying on post-sale royalties negotiated with marketplaces, on-chain royalties can be embedded into the sale itself. In practice, that could mean automatic, hardcoded payments to multiple contributors the moment a transaction clears, ensuring creators retain a larger share of the long-term value of their work.

In parallel, the piece points to changes in royalty policies at major marketplaces. OpenSea and others have moved toward optional royalty enforcement, a shift some view as a step toward a more flexible, user-driven marketplace. The broader implication is a move toward a system where creators are less hostage to a single platform’s policy and more able to capture value across networks and marketplaces over time. The discussion frames this as a shift toward “participatory capitalism”—the growth of the ecosystem should lift the people who built it.

Open questions remain about how broadly such on-chain royalties will be adopted and how they will interact with existing metadata standards, licensing frameworks, and consumer-facing experiences. Still, the logic is clear: when revenue splits occur at the moment of sale rather than after the fact, creators can benefit from the long-term appreciation of their work, even as it changes hands across markets and platforms.

Infrastructure as the foundation of family

Beyond royalties, the authors emphasize the importance of a robust payments backbone—what they describe as infrastructure that goes beyond community to become an engine. For millions of women entering the creator economy, crypto rails can offer a global passport that sidesteps currency volatility and biased banking systems.

Stablecoins are highlighted as a practical bridge for creators who must hold value in volatile regions. By enabling creators to hold the purchasing power of their work without applying for a bank account or awaiting payment rails, stablecoins reduce friction and risk at both ends of the transaction. This, in turn, can accelerate monetization and enable more ambitious cross-border projects.

The piece also notes that reliable payment rails are a crucial factor in turning audience-building into a sustainable business. When creators can monetize globally and promptly, they’re less constrained by local banking restrictions or slow settlement times, a dynamic that disproportionately affects women in emerging markets seeking to scale. The authors point to real-world examples where payments infrastructure has mattered for creators’ ability to participate in global value chains.

Moving toward ownership

Ownership, the authors argue, is not a gift but a status earned through access to the system itself. The pivot to Web3 payment infrastructure is portrayed as a move toward giving creators a deed to their own revenue, reducing dependence on legacy systems that historically have controlled access to capital and markets. The call is for creators—not gatekeepers—to shape the payment rails on which the ecosystem runs, a shift the authors believe is already underway in practice as more projects explore on-chain payments, royalties, and decentralized marketplaces.

As the authors put it, “The infrastructure is ready. The only thing left is for the creators to lead.” The broader implication is clear: if the creator economy is to become truly inclusive and globally scalable, it will rely on decentralized payment paradigms that empower individuals to monetize their work without requiring permission from traditional financial institutions.

Opinion by Ashna Vaghela, chief customer officer at Mercuryo, and Vi Powils, CEO of World of Women, underscores a broader narrative: a future where financial inclusion is shaped by code, not by compliance bottlenecks, could unlock unprecedented opportunities for women creators worldwide.

This article reflects the authors’ viewpoints and has undergone editorial review to ensure clarity and relevance for readers navigating the evolving intersection of crypto, payments, and creative economies. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before taking action related to the topics discussed.

This article was originally published as Web3 rails enable women creators to reclaim ownership on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Market Opportunity
Based Logo
Based Price(BASED)
$0.12212
$0.12212$0.12212
+205.30%
USD
Based (BASED) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO

Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO

The post Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief American Bitcoin
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 01:01
What the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Means for ETH’s Future

What the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Means for ETH’s Future

The Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) is a new framework backed by the Ethereum Foundation, Gnosis, and Zisk that aims to address one of Ethereum’s biggest structural
Share
Ethnews2026/03/31 01:12
USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48