The post Amazon Sends Cease-and-Desist to Perplexity Over AI Agent Purchases appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Amazon accused Perplexity’s Comet browser of violating its terms by disguising bots as human shoppers. Perplexity called the claims “legal bluster,” and said Amazon is trying to block user choice in AI assistants. The dispute highlights growing tension over “agentic browsers” like Comet, ChatGPT Atlas, and Opera Neon. In an early showdown over the rise of “agentic” browsers, Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity AI demanding that its Comet assistant stop making purchases on the site. Amazon accused the AI search startup of disguising bots as human shoppers and violating its terms of service. The e-commerce giant said Perplexity’s agent “degraded the Amazon shopping experience” and introduced privacy risks by acting on users’ behalf without disclosure, according to a letter first reported by Bloomberg. Perplexity pushed back against the claims, calling them a bullying tactic. “Amazon’s claims are typical legal bluster and completely unfounded,” a company spokesperson told Decrypt. “What if stores said you can only hire a personal shopper who works for the store? That’s not a personal shopper, it’s a sales associate.”  Agentic browsers embed autonomous AI agents that act on the user’s behalf, automating tasks like filling out forms, booking travel, or making purchases without manual clicks. Recent rollouts include Perplexity AI’s Comet, OpenAI’s ChatGPT Atlas, BrowserOS, and Opera Neon. In September, OpenAI introduced an “Instant Checkout” feature in ChatGPT that allowed AI agents to complete purchases for users via chat after integrating in-app shopping earlier this year. In a blog post titled “Bullying Is Not Innovation,” Perplexity called Amazon’s legal threat “dangerous” and framed the dispute as a fight over user autonomy. “It’s dangerous to confuse consumer experience with consumer exploitation,” Perplexity wrote. “Users want AI they can trust, and they want AI assistants that work on their behalf and no one… The post Amazon Sends Cease-and-Desist to Perplexity Over AI Agent Purchases appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Amazon accused Perplexity’s Comet browser of violating its terms by disguising bots as human shoppers. Perplexity called the claims “legal bluster,” and said Amazon is trying to block user choice in AI assistants. The dispute highlights growing tension over “agentic browsers” like Comet, ChatGPT Atlas, and Opera Neon. In an early showdown over the rise of “agentic” browsers, Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity AI demanding that its Comet assistant stop making purchases on the site. Amazon accused the AI search startup of disguising bots as human shoppers and violating its terms of service. The e-commerce giant said Perplexity’s agent “degraded the Amazon shopping experience” and introduced privacy risks by acting on users’ behalf without disclosure, according to a letter first reported by Bloomberg. Perplexity pushed back against the claims, calling them a bullying tactic. “Amazon’s claims are typical legal bluster and completely unfounded,” a company spokesperson told Decrypt. “What if stores said you can only hire a personal shopper who works for the store? That’s not a personal shopper, it’s a sales associate.”  Agentic browsers embed autonomous AI agents that act on the user’s behalf, automating tasks like filling out forms, booking travel, or making purchases without manual clicks. Recent rollouts include Perplexity AI’s Comet, OpenAI’s ChatGPT Atlas, BrowserOS, and Opera Neon. In September, OpenAI introduced an “Instant Checkout” feature in ChatGPT that allowed AI agents to complete purchases for users via chat after integrating in-app shopping earlier this year. In a blog post titled “Bullying Is Not Innovation,” Perplexity called Amazon’s legal threat “dangerous” and framed the dispute as a fight over user autonomy. “It’s dangerous to confuse consumer experience with consumer exploitation,” Perplexity wrote. “Users want AI they can trust, and they want AI assistants that work on their behalf and no one…

Amazon Sends Cease-and-Desist to Perplexity Over AI Agent Purchases

2025/11/05 07:25

In brief

  • Amazon accused Perplexity’s Comet browser of violating its terms by disguising bots as human shoppers.
  • Perplexity called the claims “legal bluster,” and said Amazon is trying to block user choice in AI assistants.
  • The dispute highlights growing tension over “agentic browsers” like Comet, ChatGPT Atlas, and Opera Neon.

In an early showdown over the rise of “agentic” browsers, Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity AI demanding that its Comet assistant stop making purchases on the site. Amazon accused the AI search startup of disguising bots as human shoppers and violating its terms of service.

The e-commerce giant said Perplexity’s agent “degraded the Amazon shopping experience” and introduced privacy risks by acting on users’ behalf without disclosure, according to a letter first reported by Bloomberg.

Perplexity pushed back against the claims, calling them a bullying tactic.

“Amazon’s claims are typical legal bluster and completely unfounded,” a company spokesperson told Decrypt. “What if stores said you can only hire a personal shopper who works for the store? That’s not a personal shopper, it’s a sales associate.”

Agentic browsers embed autonomous AI agents that act on the user’s behalf, automating tasks like filling out forms, booking travel, or making purchases without manual clicks. Recent rollouts include Perplexity AI’s Comet, OpenAI’s ChatGPT Atlas, BrowserOS, and Opera Neon. In September, OpenAI introduced an “Instant Checkout” feature in ChatGPT that allowed AI agents to complete purchases for users via chat after integrating in-app shopping earlier this year.

In a blog post titled “Bullying Is Not Innovation,” Perplexity called Amazon’s legal threat “dangerous” and framed the dispute as a fight over user autonomy.

“It’s dangerous to confuse consumer experience with consumer exploitation,” Perplexity wrote. “Users want AI they can trust, and they want AI assistants that work on their behalf and no one else’s.”

The post argued that users have the right to “hire their own digital assistants,” and that “publishers and corporations have no right to discriminate against users based on which AI they’ve chosen to represent them.”

Amazon’s terms prohibit any use of data mining, robots, or similar data-gathering and extraction tools. Amazon said Comet disguised automated logins as a Google Chrome browser; after Amazon blocked the activity, Perplexity released an update to bypass the restriction.

Amazon defended its position, saying that third-party AI agents must operate transparently and in cooperation with participating businesses.

“We think it’s fairly straightforward that third-party applications that offer to make purchases on behalf of customers from other businesses should operate openly and respect service provider decisions whether or not to participate,” Amazon said in a statement. “Agentic third-party applications such as Perplexity’s Comet have the same obligations, and we’ve repeatedly requested that Perplexity remove Amazon from the Comet experience, particularly in light of the significantly degraded shopping and customer service experience it provides.”

Amazon said it remains open to agentic experiences that operate transparently and enhance customer value.

Perplexity maintained that Comet, when shopping, only uses the customer’s own credentials stored locally on their device—not on Perplexity’s servers—and argued that its agents “act solely on the user’s behalf.” It also accused Amazon of being more interested in “serving ads and influencing purchasing decisions with upsells and confusing offers” than improving customer experience.

Perplexity is a major customer of Amazon Web Services running its infrastructure on AWS, and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is an investor, adding irony to a conflict that pits two intertwined companies against each other in defining who controls the next era of web automation.

For now, Amazon’s cease-and-desist marks one of the first formal challenges to how AI browsers operate when they search, click, and shop online.

“The future of agentic commerce will depend on users’ right to choose and trust their own AI agents,” Perplexity AI’s spokesperson said.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.

Source: https://decrypt.co/347325/amazon-sends-cease-desist-perplexity-ai-agent-purchases

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fetch has sued Ocean and its founders, accusing them of undermining DAO governance by selling 263 million FET tokens without authorization.

Fetch has sued Ocean and its founders, accusing them of undermining DAO governance by selling 263 million FET tokens without authorization.

PANews reported on November 8th that, according to CryptoSlate, Fetch and three token holders have filed a class-action lawsuit in the Southern District of New York, accusing Ocean Protocol and its founders of misleading the community and causing misunderstandings about the autonomy of OceanDAO. The lawsuit, case number 1:25-cv-9210, was filed on November 4, 2025. The defendants include Ocean Protocol Foundation Ltd., Ocean Expeditions Ltd., OceanDAO, and Ocean's co-founders Bruce Pon, Trent McConaghy, and Christina Pon. The plaintiff alleges that Ocean falsely stated that hundreds of millions of OCEAN "community" tokens would be reserved for DAO rewards, but in reality, after joining the ASI consortium, it converted and sold these tokens, thereby depressing the value of FET and undermining the governance model claimed by the DAO. The lawsuit claims that over 661 million OCEAN were converted into approximately 286.46 million FET, and subsequently approximately 263 million FET were released into the market, equivalent to more than 10% of the then-circulating supply, causing downward pressure on the price of FET during and after Ocean's withdrawal from the market. The document states that Ocean transferred OceanDAO assets to the Cayman Islands entity Ocean Expeditions in late June, began converting OCEAN to FET in early July, liquidated most of the resulting FET on a centralized trading venue, and withdrew from the ASI consortium in October.
Share
PANews2025/11/08 09:28
The Elite Advisory Board Raising the Bar for Crypto Credibility!

The Elite Advisory Board Raising the Bar for Crypto Credibility!

The post The Elite Advisory Board Raising the Bar for Crypto Credibility! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Presales Explore how BlockDAG’s world-class advisory board, led by Dr. Maurice Herlihy, turned academic excellence into real blockchain innovation! When most crypto projects struggle to prove their credibility, BlockDAG went a different route; it built one. Instead of relying on hype or flashy marketing, it assembled a board of advisors whose resumes could power an entire university department. This group doesn’t just lend prestige; it validates the technology behind BlockDAG’s hybrid Proof-of-Work and Directed Acyclic Graph system. Among them is Dr. Maurice Herlihy, one of computer science’s most decorated minds and a true authority in distributed computing. The strategy here is simple yet brilliant: combine practical blockchain expertise with academic strength to create a foundation built on real innovation and proven knowledge, not speculation. The Vision: Build More Than a Team BlockDAG understood early that innovation needs more than developers; it needs thinkers who have shaped the field itself. The leadership, headed by CEO Antony Turner, chose to build what they call a “Genius Bar” of blockchain intellect. This idea came from the realization that credibility in crypto doesn’t come from influencers or endorsements; it comes from having the right people asking the right questions. Turner’s background in fintech and Swiss regulation gave him the insight to merge institutional discipline with crypto creativity. This approach reshaped how investors perceive early-stage blockchain ventures. Instead of anonymous teams, BlockDAG offered transparency, leadership, and a network of experts who have not only theorized innovation but also implemented it at scale. That’s why it has become the best-performing crypto today, combining logic, structure, and execution. Dr. Maurice Herlihy: The Academic Powerhouse Every innovation needs an anchor, someone who ensures the foundation is scientifically sound. For BlockDAG, that anchor is Dr. Maurice Herlihy. As a professor at Brown University and winner of the Gödel…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/08 09:04