The post College Football Playoff Can’t Be Operated By Networks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – JANUARY 2: CFP, ESPN branding on TV camera before the College Football Playoff Quarterfinal game between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Notre Dame Fighting Irish at the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome on January 2, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by CFP/Getty Images) Getty Images Since its inception in 2014, the College Football Playoff has almost courted conflict. From its made-up terms like “game control” and a revolving door of important metrics depending on the teams and conferences in question, the system that was introduced to replace the much-bemoaned Bowl Championship Series has introduced more mystery than ever to the process of determining college football’s best teams. That mystery has only grown as the pool of teams included in the playoff field ballooned last year from four to 12. And one thing has remained relatively consistent: To fairly determine a field of deserving teams, the College Football Playoff cannot be operated by a network. Inherent Conflict Of Interest This isn’t just to pick on ESPN. It’s to point out the fact that any network is bound to be a flawed tournament creator given dwindling linear TV audiences, small pool of nationally-relevant programs and the dizzying ad revenues associated with these games. ESPN, is after all, most interested in creating the best entertainment product, and the one most likely to bring in TV viewers. The same would be true for Fox, NBC or CBS if they were the operators of the event. CBS, to that point, splits rights for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament with TNT Sports, but does not operate the (larger) event in the same way, with the NCAA Selection Committee ultimately determining participants. So while March Madness is also a TV product – and an immense one – that’s not inherent in… The post College Football Playoff Can’t Be Operated By Networks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – JANUARY 2: CFP, ESPN branding on TV camera before the College Football Playoff Quarterfinal game between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Notre Dame Fighting Irish at the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome on January 2, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by CFP/Getty Images) Getty Images Since its inception in 2014, the College Football Playoff has almost courted conflict. From its made-up terms like “game control” and a revolving door of important metrics depending on the teams and conferences in question, the system that was introduced to replace the much-bemoaned Bowl Championship Series has introduced more mystery than ever to the process of determining college football’s best teams. That mystery has only grown as the pool of teams included in the playoff field ballooned last year from four to 12. And one thing has remained relatively consistent: To fairly determine a field of deserving teams, the College Football Playoff cannot be operated by a network. Inherent Conflict Of Interest This isn’t just to pick on ESPN. It’s to point out the fact that any network is bound to be a flawed tournament creator given dwindling linear TV audiences, small pool of nationally-relevant programs and the dizzying ad revenues associated with these games. ESPN, is after all, most interested in creating the best entertainment product, and the one most likely to bring in TV viewers. The same would be true for Fox, NBC or CBS if they were the operators of the event. CBS, to that point, splits rights for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament with TNT Sports, but does not operate the (larger) event in the same way, with the NCAA Selection Committee ultimately determining participants. So while March Madness is also a TV product – and an immense one – that’s not inherent in…

College Football Playoff Can’t Be Operated By Networks

2025/11/06 06:57

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA – JANUARY 2: CFP, ESPN branding on TV camera before the College Football Playoff Quarterfinal game between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Notre Dame Fighting Irish at the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome on January 2, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Photo by CFP/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Since its inception in 2014, the College Football Playoff has almost courted conflict.

From its made-up terms like “game control” and a revolving door of important metrics depending on the teams and conferences in question, the system that was introduced to replace the much-bemoaned Bowl Championship Series has introduced more mystery than ever to the process of determining college football’s best teams.

That mystery has only grown as the pool of teams included in the playoff field ballooned last year from four to 12. And one thing has remained relatively consistent: To fairly determine a field of deserving teams, the College Football Playoff cannot be operated by a network.

Inherent Conflict Of Interest

This isn’t just to pick on ESPN. It’s to point out the fact that any network is bound to be a flawed tournament creator given dwindling linear TV audiences, small pool of nationally-relevant programs and the dizzying ad revenues associated with these games.

ESPN, is after all, most interested in creating the best entertainment product, and the one most likely to bring in TV viewers. The same would be true for Fox, NBC or CBS if they were the operators of the event. CBS, to that point, splits rights for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament with TNT Sports, but does not operate the (larger) event in the same way, with the NCAA Selection Committee ultimately determining participants.

So while March Madness is also a TV product – and an immense one – that’s not inherent in the construction of the field, in part because there are more teams, but also because a network is not determining the participants.

This conversation is particularly relevant the day after the initial College Football Playoff standings were revealed, and a two-loss Notre Dame team controversially sat at No. 10.

ESPN’s release of the first 12-team College Football Playoff field projection for 2025

Credit: ESPN on Twitter

TV Decisions Over On-Field Results

ESPN doesn’t typically have the rights to Notre Dame football games, save when the Fighting Irish play on the road at ACC or SEC teams. Notre Dame also lost to fellow two-loss team Miami, which sits well behind them in the rankings at No. 18.

But the Irish are annually one of TV’s biggest draws. Miami, or one-loss teams like Virginia, Louisville or Georgia Tech (all left out) may not be – though it is notable that Miami has ranked slightly ahead of Notre Dame by average viewers this season according to recent Nielsen data.

Plenty can change here between now and the end of the season. Yet for now, it’s partly a replay of the issues that came up in the final iteration of the four-team College Football Playoff format, when an unbeaten Florida State team was snubbed from the field in favor of (bigger TV draw and SEC champion) Alabama.

That Crimson Tide team was a deserving participant on paper, at 12-1 with a major conference crown. However, FSU went unbeaten, won the ACC and did everything it could possibly do to position itself within the four-team field.

Alabama was left out the following year in favor of less-popular SMU for the final at-large spot in the 12-team playoff, which certainly harms this narrative around TV draw trumping on-field results. However, a fair decision there (giving an 11-2 SMU the nod over 9-3 Alabama) doesn’t remove the fact that ESPN shouldn’t be in the position to be the final arbiter to begin with.

Dating back to the first College Football Playoff, Ohio State made it over both Big 12 co-champions TCU and Baylor in 2014. Central Florida was the only unbeaten team in 2017, yet couldn’t sniff the field.

And as college conferences have consolidated, there’s also a good chance that a future playoff decision could come down to an SEC or ACC team (all rights owned by ESPN) versus a Big Ten (Fox/CBS/NBC) or Big 12 team (ESPN/Fox).

This dynamic has been rearing its head already with things like College Gameday campus selections. Where ESPN once largely opted for the most interesting matchup (in part because it once had at least partial rights to all of the power conferences), the emergence of Fox’s competitive Big Noon Kickoff has led to selections that more closely mirror who has broadcast rights.

Of course, this is all part of life in modern college football. And the network-owned Playoff genie, like the spiraling issues around NIL, isn’t being put back in the bottle anytime soon. But in the long-term, the event risks losing legitimacy without a clearer separation between its media partner(s) and its selection process.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncassillo/2025/11/05/college-football-playoff-cant-be-operated-by-networks/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Evernorth’s XRP Losses Signal Growing Pressures on Crypto Treasury Firms

Evernorth’s XRP Losses Signal Growing Pressures on Crypto Treasury Firms

The post Evernorth’s XRP Losses Signal Growing Pressures on Crypto Treasury Firms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → Evernorth’s XRP investment has resulted in approximately $78 million in unrealized losses amid a month-long cryptocurrency market downturn, highlighting the vulnerabilities of digital asset treasury companies (DATs). This pressure stems from volatile prices affecting altcoins like XRP, impacting firms heavily exposed to such assets. Evernorth acquired significant XRP holdings just before a price drop, leading to substantial unrealized losses. Other DATs, like MicroStrategy, face share declines of over 26% in the past month due to Bitcoin’s retreat. BitMine reports nearly $2.1 billion in unrealized losses on Ethereum reserves, with 3.4 million ETH held, including 565,000 acquired recently. Discover how Evernorth’s XRP losses signal rising pressure on digital asset treasury companies amid crypto volatility. Explore DAT challenges and strategies for resilience. Stay informed on market impacts today. What Are Evernorth’s XRP Investment Losses and Their Impact? Evernorth’s XRP investment losses currently stand at around $78 million in unrealized terms, triggered by a sharp decline in XRP’s price following the company’s recent large-scale acquisitions. This situation underscores the risks for digital asset treasury companies (DATs) that allocate significant portions of their…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/08 11:15