DWF Labs, a market-making firm active in crypto markets, has been linked to an alleged loss of $44 million in a hack that took place in September 2022. Related Reading: Trump Warns Of China’s Crypto Surge, Calls For US To Take Lead According to on-chain investigators, the incident was not publicly disclosed by the firm […]DWF Labs, a market-making firm active in crypto markets, has been linked to an alleged loss of $44 million in a hack that took place in September 2022. Related Reading: Trump Warns Of China’s Crypto Surge, Calls For US To Take Lead According to on-chain investigators, the incident was not publicly disclosed by the firm […]

Crypto Firm DWF Labs Lose $44M To North Korean-Linked Hackers – Report

2025/11/06 11:00

DWF Labs, a market-making firm active in crypto markets, has been linked to an alleged loss of $44 million in a hack that took place in September 2022.

According to on-chain investigators, the incident was not publicly disclosed by the firm at the time and only came to light after a detailed blockchain review.

DWF Labs: Alleged Attack And Method

Reports have disclosed that the attacker drained a wallet tied to DWF Labs and moved the funds through several on-chain steps.

The stolen holdings were mostly stablecoins — USDC and USDT — and were then converted into Bitcoin through the Ren bridge before being routed into a mixer called Mixero.

The pattern of transfers and the tools used are what led some analysts to suggest a link to the DPRK-associated AppleJeus group.

On-Chain Evidence And Reactions

Based on reports, the investigation was driven by an analyst known as tanuki42 who flagged the wallet address and traced payments made to and from it before and after the alleged breach.

Other sleuths on X, including well-known chain trackers, began to comment and share findings. Some posts pointed to roughly $30 million in Bitcoin-valued pots that have not been touched since the transfers, raising questions about what the attacker intends to do next.

DWF Labs has not posted a public incident report or a formal acknowledgement of the claims.

What The Movement Looks Like

Money moved into centralized exchanges at certain points, which suggests private keys or exchange accounts may have been compromised during the event.

After conversion, the flow into a mixer makes it harder to follow the exact trail, but on-chain records show the sequence and timestamps that tie these steps to the September dates.

The way funds were handled is similar to other cases tied to state-linked threat actors, according to the analysts studying the chain.

Potential Impact And Next Steps

If the allegation is confirmed by an independent audit or by the firm itself, the fallout could affect counterparties and projects that relied on DWF Labs for liquidity.

Some forensic firms and trackers are poring over the dormant pots of Bitcoin that amount to about $30 million in current value, while exchanges and law-enforcement partners may be asked to help trace or freeze moves if they occur.

Investor confidence is part of the discussion now, because public trust depends on clear disclosure and rapid response once a breach is found.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00