The post Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The trading world was once divided into two groups: those with access to high-powered data and those without.  As you might have guessed, it was the major institutions (like Wall Street) that had a monopoly on the tools, data access, and speed. This left retail traders fighting to keep up. This gap is closing rapidly, and the main reason is the introduction of new technology and platforms entering the fold. Zak Westphal has been at the forefront of this transformation. While Co-Founding StocksToTrade, he has been a big part of empowering everyday traders to gain access to the real-time information and algorithmic systems that have long provided Wall Street with its edge. We spoke with him about how fintech is reshaping the landscape and what it really means for retail traders today. Fintech has changed everything from banking to payments. In your opinion, what has been its greatest impact on the world of trading? For me, it’s all about access. When I began my trading career, institutions had a significant advantage, even more pronounced than it is now. They had direct feeds of data, algorithmic systems, and research teams monitoring information right around the clock. Retail traders, on the other hand, had slower information and pretty basic tools in comparison.  Fintech has substantially changed the game. Today, a retail trader from home can access real-time market data, scan thousands of stocks in mere seconds, and utilize algorithmic tools that were once only available to hedge funds. I can’t think of a time when the access for everyday traders has been as accessible as it is today. That doesn’t mean the advantages are gone, because Wall Street still has resources that individuals simply can’t have. However, there is now an opportunity for everyday traders actually to compete. And that is a… The post Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The trading world was once divided into two groups: those with access to high-powered data and those without.  As you might have guessed, it was the major institutions (like Wall Street) that had a monopoly on the tools, data access, and speed. This left retail traders fighting to keep up. This gap is closing rapidly, and the main reason is the introduction of new technology and platforms entering the fold. Zak Westphal has been at the forefront of this transformation. While Co-Founding StocksToTrade, he has been a big part of empowering everyday traders to gain access to the real-time information and algorithmic systems that have long provided Wall Street with its edge. We spoke with him about how fintech is reshaping the landscape and what it really means for retail traders today. Fintech has changed everything from banking to payments. In your opinion, what has been its greatest impact on the world of trading? For me, it’s all about access. When I began my trading career, institutions had a significant advantage, even more pronounced than it is now. They had direct feeds of data, algorithmic systems, and research teams monitoring information right around the clock. Retail traders, on the other hand, had slower information and pretty basic tools in comparison.  Fintech has substantially changed the game. Today, a retail trader from home can access real-time market data, scan thousands of stocks in mere seconds, and utilize algorithmic tools that were once only available to hedge funds. I can’t think of a time when the access for everyday traders has been as accessible as it is today. That doesn’t mean the advantages are gone, because Wall Street still has resources that individuals simply can’t have. However, there is now an opportunity for everyday traders actually to compete. And that is a…

Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal

2025/09/18 17:14

The trading world was once divided into two groups: those with access to high-powered data and those without. 

As you might have guessed, it was the major institutions (like Wall Street) that had a monopoly on the tools, data access, and speed. This left retail traders fighting to keep up. This gap is closing rapidly, and the main reason is the introduction of new technology and platforms entering the fold.

Zak Westphal has been at the forefront of this transformation. While Co-Founding StocksToTrade, he has been a big part of empowering everyday traders to gain access to the real-time information and algorithmic systems that have long provided Wall Street with its edge. We spoke with him about how fintech is reshaping the landscape and what it really means for retail traders today.


Fintech has changed everything from banking to payments. In your opinion, what has been its greatest impact on the world of trading?

For me, it’s all about access. When I began my trading career, institutions had a significant advantage, even more pronounced than it is now. They had direct feeds of data, algorithmic systems, and research teams monitoring information right around the clock. Retail traders, on the other hand, had slower information and pretty basic tools in comparison. 

Fintech has substantially changed the game. Today, a retail trader from home can access real-time market data, scan thousands of stocks in mere seconds, and utilize algorithmic tools that were once only available to hedge funds. I can’t think of a time when the access for everyday traders has been as accessible as it is today.

That doesn’t mean the advantages are gone, because Wall Street still has resources that individuals simply can’t have. However, there is now an opportunity for everyday traders actually to compete. And that is a big deal. 

Algorithmic trading was once a tool possessed only by Wall Street. How are retail traders leveraging it?

At its core, algorithmic trading is simply telling a computer, “follow some rules for me.” Think of it as a robot assistant that will only buy or sell when the conditions of your rules are satisfied.

There is a broad spectrum of this type of trading. On one end, anyone can create a “buy after X happens” rule on a platform like TradingView. On the other hand, sophisticated systems can monitor data streams and detect opportunities in a split second, based on multiple inputs.

A common misconception about algorithmic trading is that it is the same as AI trading, but they are distinct processes. Algorithmic trading takes the rules and framework you set. AI trading also utilizes algorithms, but can translate the rules into more complex analysis and adjust them on the fly, such as by reading news sentiment.

The key point here is that this technology is no longer just for Wall Street. Now retail traders can use these tools to trade systematically and remove emotion from the equation, which opens up a paradigm shift in how people approach the markets. 

The fintech space has been growing rapidly, but regulations are starting to catch up. How do you think that will shape the industry?

Regulation is inevitable, and it has many benefits. Retail trading is an area of massive growth, and understandably, regulators step up to ensure that people are protected when a large amount of money is changing hands.

For fintech companies, that means credibility and transparency will be just as significant a component as innovating. They can’t simply roll out a flashy tool and make endless promises that users will make life-changing amounts of money or attain some unrealistic win percentage. Hopefully, the days when these platforms exist are coming to an end sooner rather than later. 

Platforms will need to demonstrate how their technology works, clearly explain the associated risks, and ensure they’re compliant.

That’s not a bad thing in my opinion. It’s going to weed out the hype products from the real ones and make companies build for the long term. The trader wins in that scenario, as it should give them more confidence in the tools they are using.

Mobile-first adoption is gaining momentum worldwide. How does that impact who gets to participate in trading?

It impacts everything. In emerging markets, such as Southeast Asia or Africa, many people have never encountered the traditional broker model and instead opt for mobile-first fintech platforms.

This opens the door for millions of new traders to participate in global markets for the first time. That means increased liquidity, diversity, and opportunity.

For platforms, the key challenge is balancing the simplicity and accessibility of their tools for beginners while still maintaining advanced functionality for expert traders. If you can nail that balance, you don’t just get more users; you create lifelong traders who continue to use your platform because they feel supported and informed.

Finally, has fintech truly leveled the playing field between retail and institutional traders, or is a significant gap still present?

Fintech is bridging the gap, but I wouldn’t say the playing field is leveled yet. Retail traders now have real-time data, algorithmic tools, and AI-based analysis, for example. All of which were once exclusive to institutions. That is a massive advancement in the last five or ten years, let’s say. 

However, institutions still have significant advantages, such as access to capital resources, entire teams dedicated to creating market research, and the ability to execute trades in milliseconds. Retail traders are unlikely to outperform or outdo institutions.

Where fintech really helps retail is efficiency. A single trader can now scan the market, process news, and identify opportunities in seconds — tasks that once required a whole team. That puts them in the game in a way they weren’t before.

The gap is smaller, but it’s still not gone. It does not even need to be gone. Retail traders can still be successful without having to trade like an institution; they just need the tools, education, and discipline to do so successfully.


Read more interviews here.  

Source: https://finbold.com/zak-westphal-interview/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Coinbase en Mastercard strijden om miljardenovername stablecoin-bedrijf BVNK

Coinbase en Mastercard strijden om miljardenovername stablecoin-bedrijf BVNK

Connect met Like-minded Crypto Enthusiasts! Connect op Discord! Check onze Discord Coinbase en Mastercard zijn verwikkeld in een biedingsstrijd om het Britse stablecoin-bedrijf BVNK over te nemen. Volgens zakenblad Fortune ligt de verkoopprijs tussen 1,5 en 2,5 miljard dollar. Daarmee zou het gaan om de grootste overname van een stablecoin-bedrijf tot nu toe. Grootste overname in stablecoin-markt tot nu toe Uit anonieme bronnen blijkt dat Coinbase dichter bij een akkoord zou staan dan Mastercard. Beide partijen hebben vergevorderde gesprekken gevoerd, maar een definitieve beslissing is nog niet genomen. Als de deal doorgaat, zou het record van Stripe worden verbroken. Dat Amerikaanse betalingsbedrijf kocht in oktober 2024 het platform Bridge voor 1,1 miljard dollar. BVNK, opgericht in 2021, levert infrastructuur voor betalingen in stablecoins aan grote bedrijven. Onder de klanten bevinden zich Worldpay, Flywire en dLocal. Het bedrijf claimt jaarlijks meer dan 20 miljard dollar te verwerken. Onlangs investeerde Citi Ventures in BVNK, een teken dat de belangstelling vanuit institutionele hoek groeit. Coinbase wilde geen commentaar geven op de berichten en Mastercard en BVNK hebben tot nu toe niet gereageerd. Opkomst van stablecoins De belangstelling voor stablecoins groeit snel. In de afgelopen maand overschreed de markt voor het eerst een gezamenlijke waarde van 300 miljard dollar. Stablecoins zijn cryptomunten die gekoppeld zijn aan traditionele valuta, meestal de Amerikaanse dollar. Ze combineren de snelheid en efficiëntie van blockchain-technologie met de stabiliteit van fiatgeld. Voor bedrijven vormen stablecoins een praktische oplossing om wereldwijd betalingen te doen zonder de volatiliteit van traditionele cryptomunten zoals Bitcoin. Voor consumenten kan het een manier zijn om goedkoop en snel geld te versturen, vergelijkbaar met traditionele betaaldiensten, maar dan buiten het banksysteem om.   Welke crypto nu kopen?Lees onze uitgebreide gids en leer welke crypto nu kopen verstandig kan zijn! Welke crypto nu kopen? De rentes zijn officieel omlaag voor het eerst sinds 2024, heeft Fed-voorzitter Jerome Powell vorige week aangekondigd, en dus lijkt de markt klaar om te gaan stijgen. Eén vraag komt telkens terug: welke crypto moet je nu kopen? In dit artikel bespreken we de munten die in 2025 écht het verschil kunnen… Continue reading Coinbase en Mastercard strijden om miljardenovername stablecoin-bedrijf BVNK document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var screenWidth = window.innerWidth; var excerpts = document.querySelectorAll('.lees-ook-description'); excerpts.forEach(function(description) { var excerpt = description.getAttribute('data-description'); var wordLimit = screenWidth wordLimit) { var trimmedDescription = excerpt.split(' ').slice(0, wordLimit).join(' ') + '...'; description.textContent = trimmedDescription; } }); });   De geopolitieke dimensie De snelle opkomst van stablecoins heeft ook een geopolitieke dimensie. In juli nam het Amerikaanse Congres de GENIUS Act aan, die duidelijke regels vaststelt voor stablecoins die aan de dollar zijn gekoppeld. Daarmee positioneert de VS zich als wereldleider in deze markt. De Amerikaanse overheid ziet stablecoins mogelijk zelfs als middel om de rol van de dollar als wereldreservemunt te versterken. In een wereld waarin China de digitale yuan promoot en andere landen experimenteren met digitale centrale bankmunten, zou de dominantie van Amerikaanse stablecoins de invloed van de dollar kunnen bestendigen. Dat de interesse van partijen als Coinbase en Mastercard juist nu piekt, is volgens analisten geen toeval. De regulering in de VS geeft meer zekerheid en de marktkapitalisatie van stablecoins blijft groeien. Ook Circle, de uitgever van USDC, maakte onlangs zijn beursdebuut op Wall Street. Sinds de notering op de New York Stock Exchange steeg het aandeel met 118 procent. Stablecoins als fundament van het nieuwe financiële systeem Volgens deskundigen is het een kwestie van tijd voordat stablecoins een vast onderdeel worden van het wereldwijde financiële systeem. Voor banken en betalingsbedrijven betekent dit dat ze niet alleen met Bitcoin of andere cryptomunten rekening hoeven te houden, maar vooral met de snelle en stabiele transacties die stablecoins mogelijk maken. Een mogelijke overname van BVNK door Coinbase of Mastercard zou daarmee niet alleen een zakelijke deal zijn, maar ook een strategische zet in de strijd om de toekomst van digitaal geld. Crypto marktinzichten 10xResearch - insights in de cryptomarkt Jarenlange expertise in markt onderzoek en technische insights Data gebaseerd op meer dan 50 trading algoritmes Meest recente en accurate marktanalyses 10xResearch review Registreer op 10xResearch Het bericht Coinbase en Mastercard strijden om miljardenovername stablecoin-bedrijf BVNK is geschreven door Thom Derks en verscheen als eerst op Bitcoinmagazine.nl.
Share
Coinstats2025/10/10 17:01
Share
Democrats Propose ‘Restricted List’ for DeFi Protocols in Bill That Could ‘Kill’ Sector

Democrats Propose ‘Restricted List’ for DeFi Protocols in Bill That Could ‘Kill’ Sector

Senate Democrats sent Republicans a counter-proposal on Thursday that would permit the Treasury Department to create a “restricted list” for DeFi protocols deemed too risky, triggering an immediate halt to bipartisan crypto market structure negotiations. The proposal would impose Know Your Customer rules on crypto app frontends, including non-custodial wallets, strip protections from crypto developers, and potentially punish US nationals who use restricted protocols and generate recurring revenues from them. GOP Suspends Talks as Bipartisan Show Their Cards GOP staff suspended all crypto talks after receiving the Democratic offer, with Senate Banking Committee Republican Staff Director Catherine Fuchs writing in an email that meetings would pause “until we have an agreed upon date for markup.” Republicans criticized the proposal as not written in legislative text, containing incoherent policy ideas, and representing a bad-faith negotiation effort rather than a serious regulatory framework. Crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky stated that the counter-proposal might eliminate any opportunity to establish a structured crypto market framework. He warned that it could weaken the bipartisan backing the CLARITY Act gained in the House in July, where it passed with a vote of 294-134. Chervinsky described the proposal as an “unprecedented, unconstitutional government takeover of an entire industry” that doesn’t regulate crypto but effectively bans it. The Democrats behind the counter-proposal include Mark Warner, Ruben Gallego, Andy Kim, Reverend Raphael Warnock, Angela Alsobrooks, and Lisa Blunt Rochester. The clash threatens the GOP-led effort to pass landmark crypto legislation this year. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott and other Republicans have rushed to pass a market structure bill before year-end, but struggled to attract the necessary bipartisan support. The dispute comes as the AFL-CIO urged the Senate Banking Committee on October 7 to oppose the Responsible Financial Innovation Act, warning the legislation would expose workers’ retirement funds to crypto volatility while increasing systemic financial risk. Industry Leaders Warn Proposal Would Push Innovation Offshore Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger warned the Democratic proposal would “make compliance impossible, pushing responsible development and the next wave of financial technology offshore.” She said DeFi might survive but would thrive overseas rather than in the United States, urging “policymakers to stay at the table and continue engaging across the aisle” to ensure legislation supports rather than hinders American leadership in financial technology. Similar to Mersinger, Digital Chamber Vice President Zunera Mazhar also criticized the draft for trying to “fight illicit finance with outdated tools”, giving Treasury sweeping authority while narrowly defining decentralization and treating frontends like financial intermediaries. She also called for targeting “real chokepoints where illicit finance occurs” through risk-based oversight instead of regulating code or governance, aligning with global standards rather than creating uncertainty. Among many other industry leaders who have voiced their concerns on the proposal, the CEO of Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, joined them, saying, “It’s a bad proposal, plain and simple, that would set innovation back, and prevent the US from becoming the crypto capital of the world.” The counter-proposal clashes with the Senate Banking Committee’s Responsible Financial Innovation Act draft from September 7, a bipartisan effort assigning the Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight of spot markets while reducing Securities and Exchange Commission overreach. The RFIA draft introduced protections for DeFi developers, ensuring they can build without fear of prosecution following recent cases involving Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet developers. Bipartisan Negotiations Collapse Over Process and Substance According to Politico, Senate Democrats involved in negotiations defended their approach, with Senator Ruben Gallego spokesperson Jacques Petit saying Democrats showed up ready to work but Republicans “are crashing out.” Petit stated Democrats delivered paper and substance as requested, only for Republicans to leak the proposal and pretend surprise at policy differences. He called Republican demands to set a markup date before text agreement “like setting a wedding date before the first date.” Republicans counter that they repeatedly asked for legislative feedback since June 27 without receiving formal, substantive input on discussion drafts. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott’s spokesperson, Jeff Naft, said Chairman Scott pushed the September 30 markup date, hoping for bipartisan engagement, and asked multiple times for Democrats to commit to a markup date necessary to move legislation forward. Gallego leads a group of twelve crypto-friendly Senate Democrats negotiating the bill, including Kirsten Gillibrand, Mark Warner, Angela Alsobrooks, and Cory Booker. They face opposition from other party members like Senate Banking ranking member Elizabeth Warren, who has always been an anti-crypto advocate who believes that crypto poses risks to financial stability and national security. Gallego told reporters late Thursday that Democrats would continue working but refuse to be pushed into setting artificial deadlines for a vote while remaining committed to achieving a bipartisan market structure bill
Share
CryptoNews2025/10/10 17:37
Share