PANews reported on November 4th that the GoPlus Chinese community published an analysis on the X platform stating that, with the continued decline in price and reduced liquidity, more stablecoins like XUSD may be facing a higher risk of de-pegging or insolvency.
- 1. Yield-bearing stablecoins rely on high-return strategies (lending/leverage/LP rewards), have large exposure to external borrowing, and have high liquidity requirements (xUSD belongs to this category).
- 2. Algorithm/Dual-Token Stablecoins (without sufficient external collateral): The mechanism for maintaining price stability relies on market arbitrage/token burning, and there are no reserves for immediate redemption in fiat currency.
- 3. For projects with centralized governance or a single counterparty, the loss of private keys, governance delays, or custodian bankruptcy can all lead to the closure of redemption channels.
- 4. High concentration of holdings / A small number of whales reducing their holdings of tokens with a very high percentage of ownership in a few wallets can have a significant impact on secondary market liquidity and price stability.
- 5. Projects that promise high returns but lack transparency, have insufficient audits, anonymous teams, opaque leverage, associated addresses, and unclear sources of returns all increase project risk.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.