Mercury fintech reports $650M annualized revenue by Q3 as it scales after a $3.5B Series C, focusing on profitability.Mercury fintech reports $650M annualized revenue by Q3 as it scales after a $3.5B Series C, focusing on profitability.

Mercury fintech hits $650M annualized revenue after Series C

2025/11/07 22:29
mercury fintech

Mercury fintech announced a new milestone: at the end of Q3 the company recorded $650 million in annualized revenue, according to an exclusive Fortune interview published on November 7, 2025.

How did Mercury’s March Series C and $3.5 billion valuation reshape its growth outlook?

In March, Mercury completed a Sequoia-led $300 million Series C that valued the startup banking platform at $3.5 billion. That round supplied both capital and a market signal, validating investor belief in the company’s path to scale.

However, a financing event is a snapshot. Management and investors will use the proceeds to deepen product features, hire for regulated operations, and expand market share among startups and scaleups.

Series C details

The March financing was presented publicly as a growth round to accelerate product development and compliance investments. Media coverage at the time documented the size and lead investor, linking the cash infusion to an elevated public valuation.

Valuation and investor context

Valuation affects expectations for returns and follow-on rounds. Consequently, analysts will test unit economics against the headline figure, focusing on revenue per customer and margin trends as the company grows.

How significant is Mercury’s annualized revenue jump from $500M to $650M?

Management told Fortune that annualized revenue rose to $650 million by the end of Q3, up from $500 million at the end of 2024.

That movement implies accelerating topline momentum through 2025 and strengthens forecasts built from monthly revenue extrapolations.

That said, Mercury uses a simple monthly-to-annualized conversion for this metric rather than a contract-style ARR measure. Analysts should therefore treat the number as a high-level activity indicator rather than a fully audited trailing figure.

Will profitability remain a central pillar as the company scales?

Immad Akhund, Mercury’s cofounder and CEO, emphasised a philosophy of financial discipline. He told Fortune, “I like being profitable,” and the company has reported being GAAP profitable on both net income and EBITDA for three consecutive years.

Indeed, profitability matters in banking products because customers entrust platforms with large sums. As Akhund noted, several customers hold more than $100 million on Mercury’s systems, so sustaining margins and operational soundness builds trust.

How much is Mercury investing in compliance and risk?

Mercury has stepped up compliance spending as it scales. The company said roughly 20% of employees now sit in risk and compliance roles, and it recently hired chief compliance officer Steve Pearlman to expand those capabilities.

That investment responds in part to industry shocks. The collapses of providers like Synapse and Evolve prompted regulatory scrutiny across fintech, and Mercury’s approach aims to shore up controls and reassure customers and regulators alike.

Who are Mercury’s customers and how fast is its user base growing?

Mercury’s client list reads like a startup roll call: customers include Supabase, ElevenLabs, Lovable, Linear, Phantom, and Tempo. The company reports about 40% growth in customer counts through 2025.

Moreover, Akhund’s personal activity as an investor underscores the firm’s deep ties to startup ecosystems. He has backed more than 350 startups since 2016 and announced a personal $26 million venture fund in May, which managers say keeps him connected to founder priorities.

What verification steps should analysts take before modelling Mercury’s future?

First, compare the announced annualized figure with quarter-end accounting disclosures when available.

Second, assess customer concentration and average balances, which drive revenue stability. Finally, monitor any regulatory filings or audited statements for confirmation.

In this context, the Fortune interview is the authoritative primary report of these metrics, but follow-up financial disclosures will provide the definitive detail required for modelling and valuation work.

  • $650 million — annualized revenue at end of Q3 2025 (Fortune, November 7, 2025).
  • $500 million — annualized revenue at end of 2024 (Fortune).
  • $3.5 billion — valuation after a Sequoia-led Series C in March (Fortune).
  • Sequoia-led $300 million Series C — March financing round (Fortune; see third-party coverage below).

Exclusive interview with Immad Akhund published by Fortune, November 7, 2025; contemporaneous coverage of the March Series C was reported by TechCrunch.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Evernorth’s XRP Losses Signal Growing Pressures on Crypto Treasury Firms

Evernorth’s XRP Losses Signal Growing Pressures on Crypto Treasury Firms

The post Evernorth’s XRP Losses Signal Growing Pressures on Crypto Treasury Firms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → Evernorth’s XRP investment has resulted in approximately $78 million in unrealized losses amid a month-long cryptocurrency market downturn, highlighting the vulnerabilities of digital asset treasury companies (DATs). This pressure stems from volatile prices affecting altcoins like XRP, impacting firms heavily exposed to such assets. Evernorth acquired significant XRP holdings just before a price drop, leading to substantial unrealized losses. Other DATs, like MicroStrategy, face share declines of over 26% in the past month due to Bitcoin’s retreat. BitMine reports nearly $2.1 billion in unrealized losses on Ethereum reserves, with 3.4 million ETH held, including 565,000 acquired recently. Discover how Evernorth’s XRP losses signal rising pressure on digital asset treasury companies amid crypto volatility. Explore DAT challenges and strategies for resilience. Stay informed on market impacts today. What Are Evernorth’s XRP Investment Losses and Their Impact? Evernorth’s XRP investment losses currently stand at around $78 million in unrealized terms, triggered by a sharp decline in XRP’s price following the company’s recent large-scale acquisitions. This situation underscores the risks for digital asset treasury companies (DATs) that allocate significant portions of their…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/08 11:15