The post Robinhood Vs Coinbase: Which Platform Delivered Stronger Q3? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Robinhood reported record Q3 2025 revenue of $1.27 billion, up 45% year-over-year, driven by a 300% surge in crypto trading income. Coinbase posted $1.37 billion in revenue for the same quarter, with strong growth from derivatives and recurring revenue streams. Robinhood’s net income rose 271% to $195 million, while Coinbase reported $801 million in adjusted EBITDA. Both firms benefited from increased retail engagement, but Coinbase’s expansion in derivatives and institutional services strengthened its market position. Microstrategy’s Bitcoin holdings make headlines, but Robinhood and Coinbase generated real-time crypto revenue in Q3. Robinhood’s net income soared 271% year-over-year to $556 million on $1.27 billion in revenue, fueled by record trading volumes, about $80 billion in crypto trades and $268 million in crypto fees. Coinbase delivered larger absolute scale: $1.9 billion in revenue (up 58% YoY) and $433 million in net income. Trading Volumes and Revenue Growth: Robinhood Vs Coinbase The revenue growth for Robinhood outstripped Coinbase’s. The brokerage’s total net revenue doubled YoY to $1.27 billion. Transaction-based fees were $730 million (up 129% YoY) and net interest income $456 million. Crypto and options trading drove the gains: Robinhood handled roughly $80 billion in crypto volume and earned $268 million in crypto trading revenue. In contrast, Coinbase’s transaction revenue was $1.0 billion (over twice last year’s level) on about $295 billion in trading volume. Coinbase’s total Q3 revenue of $1.9 billion reflected broad market recovery, including $747 million in subscription and services (+14% QoQ) and $355 million in stablecoin fees. In summary, the online brokerage firm grew faster, 100% vs. 58% YoY, thanks to crypto/options booms, while the crypto exchange won on absolute trading revenue. Profit and Margins Both companies turned large profits. The GAAP net income for Robinhood was $556 million (EPS $0.61, up 259% YoY), with adjusted EBITDA of $742 million. Robinhood Q3 2025 Financial Results Highlights | Source: Robinhood Coinbase reported net income of $433 million… The post Robinhood Vs Coinbase: Which Platform Delivered Stronger Q3? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Robinhood reported record Q3 2025 revenue of $1.27 billion, up 45% year-over-year, driven by a 300% surge in crypto trading income. Coinbase posted $1.37 billion in revenue for the same quarter, with strong growth from derivatives and recurring revenue streams. Robinhood’s net income rose 271% to $195 million, while Coinbase reported $801 million in adjusted EBITDA. Both firms benefited from increased retail engagement, but Coinbase’s expansion in derivatives and institutional services strengthened its market position. Microstrategy’s Bitcoin holdings make headlines, but Robinhood and Coinbase generated real-time crypto revenue in Q3. Robinhood’s net income soared 271% year-over-year to $556 million on $1.27 billion in revenue, fueled by record trading volumes, about $80 billion in crypto trades and $268 million in crypto fees. Coinbase delivered larger absolute scale: $1.9 billion in revenue (up 58% YoY) and $433 million in net income. Trading Volumes and Revenue Growth: Robinhood Vs Coinbase The revenue growth for Robinhood outstripped Coinbase’s. The brokerage’s total net revenue doubled YoY to $1.27 billion. Transaction-based fees were $730 million (up 129% YoY) and net interest income $456 million. Crypto and options trading drove the gains: Robinhood handled roughly $80 billion in crypto volume and earned $268 million in crypto trading revenue. In contrast, Coinbase’s transaction revenue was $1.0 billion (over twice last year’s level) on about $295 billion in trading volume. Coinbase’s total Q3 revenue of $1.9 billion reflected broad market recovery, including $747 million in subscription and services (+14% QoQ) and $355 million in stablecoin fees. In summary, the online brokerage firm grew faster, 100% vs. 58% YoY, thanks to crypto/options booms, while the crypto exchange won on absolute trading revenue. Profit and Margins Both companies turned large profits. The GAAP net income for Robinhood was $556 million (EPS $0.61, up 259% YoY), with adjusted EBITDA of $742 million. Robinhood Q3 2025 Financial Results Highlights | Source: Robinhood Coinbase reported net income of $433 million…

Robinhood Vs Coinbase: Which Platform Delivered Stronger Q3?

2025/11/08 02:48

Key Insights:

  • Robinhood reported record Q3 2025 revenue of $1.27 billion, up 45% year-over-year, driven by a 300% surge in crypto trading income.
  • Coinbase posted $1.37 billion in revenue for the same quarter, with strong growth from derivatives and recurring revenue streams.
  • Robinhood’s net income rose 271% to $195 million, while Coinbase reported $801 million in adjusted EBITDA.
  • Both firms benefited from increased retail engagement, but Coinbase’s expansion in derivatives and institutional services strengthened its market position.

Microstrategy’s Bitcoin holdings make headlines, but Robinhood and Coinbase generated real-time crypto revenue in Q3.

Robinhood’s net income soared 271% year-over-year to $556 million on $1.27 billion in revenue, fueled by record trading volumes, about $80 billion in crypto trades and $268 million in crypto fees.

Coinbase delivered larger absolute scale: $1.9 billion in revenue (up 58% YoY) and $433 million in net income.

Trading Volumes and Revenue Growth: Robinhood Vs Coinbase

The revenue growth for Robinhood outstripped Coinbase’s. The brokerage’s total net revenue doubled YoY to $1.27 billion.

Transaction-based fees were $730 million (up 129% YoY) and net interest income $456 million. Crypto and options trading drove the gains: Robinhood handled roughly $80 billion in crypto volume and earned $268 million in crypto trading revenue.

In contrast, Coinbase’s transaction revenue was $1.0 billion (over twice last year’s level) on about $295 billion in trading volume.

Coinbase’s total Q3 revenue of $1.9 billion reflected broad market recovery, including $747 million in subscription and services (+14% QoQ) and $355 million in stablecoin fees.

In summary, the online brokerage firm grew faster, 100% vs. 58% YoY, thanks to crypto/options booms, while the crypto exchange won on absolute trading revenue.

Profit and Margins

Both companies turned large profits. The GAAP net income for Robinhood was $556 million (EPS $0.61, up 259% YoY), with adjusted EBITDA of $742 million.

Robinhood Q3 2025 Financial Results Highlights | Source: Robinhood

Coinbase reported net income of $433 million and adjusted EBITDA of $801 million. Coinbase managed costs tightly – Q3 operating expenses fell 9% from Q2 to $1.4 billion, which, along with higher trading volume, drove its stronger margins.

Earnings Results of Crypto Exchange Coinbase | Source: Coinbase

Robinhood’s profit margin also improved, as its fee-driven model scaled. Both CEO/CFOs noted robust earnings: Robinhood CFO Jason Warnick said Q3 delivered “another strong quarter of profitable growth,” and Coinbase wrote that it “drove solid financial results” while building its “Everything Exchange.”

Customer and Asset Growth: Robinhood Vs COIN

The user base of Robinhood continued expanding. Funded customer accounts rose 10% YoY to 26.8 million, and Gold (premium) subscriptions grew 77% to 3.9 million.

Total platform assets (stocks and crypto) jumped 119% to $333 billion on market appreciation and $20.4 billion in net deposits.

Coinbase does not report active users, but ended Q3 with about $516 billion in Assets on Platform[16] and $11.9 billion in USD cash resources, reflecting its large custodied volume.

Coinbase also saw record stablecoin balances (over $15 billion) and a 28% rise in blockchain rewards revenue (to $185 million) as crypto prices climbed. In short, Robinhood’s platform is smaller but rapidly scaling, while Coinbase serves a far larger asset pool.

MicroStrategy’s Crypto Strategy vs. Exchange Models

MicroStrategy’s approach is entirely different from Robinhood and Coinbase. Its corporate strategy is to hold Bitcoin rather than collect trading fees.

Microstrategy (now “Strategy”) reported buying 397 BTC last week, bringing its total to 641,205 coins, worth over $69 billion.

This highlights diverging strategies in crypto markets. Robinhood and Coinbase monetize every trade and service, whereas Microstrategy (“MSTR”) earns only if Bitcoin rises.

In Q3, this distinction showed up in metrics: Coinbase, with its broad exchange, generated more absolute profit ($433 million vs. $556 million at Robinhood) and revenue, but percentage growth for Robinhood was higher.

Both models benefited from higher crypto prices – Coinbase’s volume surge and Microstrategy’s balance sheet gains – but only the trading platforms turned market activity into fee revenue.

In sum, Coinbase leads in scale in Q3 while Robinhood leads in growth. Coinbase’s $1.9 billion revenue and $801 million adjusted EBITDA easily top Robinhood’s $1.27 billion and $742 million, yet Robinhood’s 100% YOY growth (vs. 58% for Coinbase) highlights its momentum.

Robinhood’s crypto and options trading drove its outsize gains, whereas Coinbase’s diversified exchange services drove higher absolute profits.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/11/07/which-platform-delivered-the-stronger-q3-robinhood-vs-coinbase/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fetch has sued Ocean and its founders, accusing them of undermining DAO governance by selling 263 million FET tokens without authorization.

Fetch has sued Ocean and its founders, accusing them of undermining DAO governance by selling 263 million FET tokens without authorization.

PANews reported on November 8th that, according to CryptoSlate, Fetch and three token holders have filed a class-action lawsuit in the Southern District of New York, accusing Ocean Protocol and its founders of misleading the community and causing misunderstandings about the autonomy of OceanDAO. The lawsuit, case number 1:25-cv-9210, was filed on November 4, 2025. The defendants include Ocean Protocol Foundation Ltd., Ocean Expeditions Ltd., OceanDAO, and Ocean's co-founders Bruce Pon, Trent McConaghy, and Christina Pon. The plaintiff alleges that Ocean falsely stated that hundreds of millions of OCEAN "community" tokens would be reserved for DAO rewards, but in reality, after joining the ASI consortium, it converted and sold these tokens, thereby depressing the value of FET and undermining the governance model claimed by the DAO. The lawsuit claims that over 661 million OCEAN were converted into approximately 286.46 million FET, and subsequently approximately 263 million FET were released into the market, equivalent to more than 10% of the then-circulating supply, causing downward pressure on the price of FET during and after Ocean's withdrawal from the market. The document states that Ocean transferred OceanDAO assets to the Cayman Islands entity Ocean Expeditions in late June, began converting OCEAN to FET in early July, liquidated most of the resulting FET on a centralized trading venue, and withdrew from the ASI consortium in October.
Share
PANews2025/11/08 09:28
The Elite Advisory Board Raising the Bar for Crypto Credibility!

The Elite Advisory Board Raising the Bar for Crypto Credibility!

The post The Elite Advisory Board Raising the Bar for Crypto Credibility! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Presales Explore how BlockDAG’s world-class advisory board, led by Dr. Maurice Herlihy, turned academic excellence into real blockchain innovation! When most crypto projects struggle to prove their credibility, BlockDAG went a different route; it built one. Instead of relying on hype or flashy marketing, it assembled a board of advisors whose resumes could power an entire university department. This group doesn’t just lend prestige; it validates the technology behind BlockDAG’s hybrid Proof-of-Work and Directed Acyclic Graph system. Among them is Dr. Maurice Herlihy, one of computer science’s most decorated minds and a true authority in distributed computing. The strategy here is simple yet brilliant: combine practical blockchain expertise with academic strength to create a foundation built on real innovation and proven knowledge, not speculation. The Vision: Build More Than a Team BlockDAG understood early that innovation needs more than developers; it needs thinkers who have shaped the field itself. The leadership, headed by CEO Antony Turner, chose to build what they call a “Genius Bar” of blockchain intellect. This idea came from the realization that credibility in crypto doesn’t come from influencers or endorsements; it comes from having the right people asking the right questions. Turner’s background in fintech and Swiss regulation gave him the insight to merge institutional discipline with crypto creativity. This approach reshaped how investors perceive early-stage blockchain ventures. Instead of anonymous teams, BlockDAG offered transparency, leadership, and a network of experts who have not only theorized innovation but also implemented it at scale. That’s why it has become the best-performing crypto today, combining logic, structure, and execution. Dr. Maurice Herlihy: The Academic Powerhouse Every innovation needs an anchor, someone who ensures the foundation is scientifically sound. For BlockDAG, that anchor is Dr. Maurice Herlihy. As a professor at Brown University and winner of the Gödel…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/08 09:04