PANews reported on October 21st that blockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps previously revealed that the top five traders by STBL token trading volume were interconnected . In an update last Sunday, these five addresses had sold all of their STBL tokens, profiting $17 million. Crypto influencer @JoestarCryptod commented that "these five interconnected traders are highly likely team members," questioning whether the STBL project is a scam. STBL founder Avtar Sehra responded, "This is complete FUD. On-chain historical records and independent analysis confirm that the aforementioned wallets have absolutely nothing to do with the STBL team. These addresses were active long before STBL launched and are known opportunists who repeat this pattern with new projects. Even the aforementioned source, Bubblemaps, has clarified that these wallets have no connection to the STBL team or insiders. This is not a 'team sell' but rather market manipulation by external actors. STBL's contracts, team wallets, and issuance are all fully transparent and verifiable on-chain."PANews reported on October 21st that blockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps previously revealed that the top five traders by STBL token trading volume were interconnected . In an update last Sunday, these five addresses had sold all of their STBL tokens, profiting $17 million. Crypto influencer @JoestarCryptod commented that "these five interconnected traders are highly likely team members," questioning whether the STBL project is a scam. STBL founder Avtar Sehra responded, "This is complete FUD. On-chain historical records and independent analysis confirm that the aforementioned wallets have absolutely nothing to do with the STBL team. These addresses were active long before STBL launched and are known opportunists who repeat this pattern with new projects. Even the aforementioned source, Bubblemaps, has clarified that these wallets have no connection to the STBL team or insiders. This is not a 'team sell' but rather market manipulation by external actors. STBL's contracts, team wallets, and issuance are all fully transparent and verifiable on-chain."
STBL founder: Five interconnected wallets with a total profit of over $17 million have nothing to do with the STBL team
2025/10/21 19:39
PANews reported on October 21st that blockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps previously revealed that the top five traders by STBL token trading volume were interconnected . In an update last Sunday, these five addresses had sold all of their STBL tokens, profiting $17 million. Crypto influencer @JoestarCryptod commented that "these five interconnected traders are highly likely team members," questioning whether the STBL project is a scam. STBL founder Avtar Sehra responded, "This is complete FUD. On-chain historical records and independent analysis confirm that the aforementioned wallets have absolutely nothing to do with the STBL team. These addresses were active long before STBL launched and are known opportunists who repeat this pattern with new projects. Even the aforementioned source, Bubblemaps, has clarified that these wallets have no connection to the STBL team or insiders. This is not a 'team sell' but rather market manipulation by external actors. STBL's contracts, team wallets, and issuance are all fully transparent and verifiable on-chain."
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights
You May Also Like
Cleaning Up Crypto ATMs Isn’t Anti-Crypto
The post Cleaning Up Crypto ATMs Isn’t Anti-Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird filed lawsuits against CoinFlip and Bitcoin Depot earlier this year, a few astroturfed voices cried that this consumer protection push was “anti-crypto.” They’re wrong. Crypto ATMs – physical kiosks that let users buy crypto – have become a vehicle for fraud, and they need reform. Law enforcement, regulators, and consumer advocates have all raised concerns about these machines for years. DC AG Brian Schwalb sued Athena Bitcoin in September. Pennsylvania AG Dave Sunday has warned that BATMs are a “magnet for scammers.” Arizona AG Kris Mayes even posted “STOP” signs at some crypto ATM locations. Congressional scrutiny is also increasing. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), a longtime Bitcoin advocate, has called for stronger safeguards. Earlier this year, Senate Judiciary Ranking Member Dick Durbin highlighted abuses, and a few weeks ago, Senator Elizabeth Warren called out crypto ATM operators, signaling that regulatory pressure will only intensify. The Evidence Nationwide, the FBI estimates that in the first half of 2025 , Americans lost $240 million to crypto ATM fraud. The Iowa AG’s office contacted the top 50 Bitcoin Depot users in Iowa between 2021 and 2024, representing more than $2.4 million in transactions. Of the 34 who responded, every single one confirmed they had been scammed. Likewise, an investigation by the DC Attorney General uncovered that 93% (!) of Athena ATM deposits in the District of Columbia during a five-month period were scam transactions. The stories follow a predictable pattern: romance scams, bogus police calls, phony tech support. Scammers play on panic, steering victims to crypto ATMs where they’re told to pour in cash and send crypto to wallets run by criminals. Store clerks at the convenience stores and smoke shops where the kiosks are hosted have tried to intervene, but to do so effectively, they need training…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/05 08:29
Incremental Learning: Comparing Methods for Catastrophic Forgetting and Model Promotion
This section reviews literature related to Instance-Incremental Learning (IIL), contrasting it with the more explored Class-Incremental Learning
Share
Hackernoon2025/11/05 02:00
The address "7 Siblings" borrowed another 61 million USDC to buy over 18,000 ETH, bringing its total purchase to nearly 38,000 ETH in two days.
PANews reported on November 5th that, according to Onchain Lens data, address "7 Siblings" has been continuously increasing its ETH holdings over the past two days. Today, it borrowed another 61 million USDC to buy 18,053 ETH, with an average purchase price of approximately $3,515. As of now, this address has used a total of 133.49 million USDC to purchase a cumulative 37,971 ETH over the past two days.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 08:25