Amidst the crossroads of waiting for the Monad mainnet launch: Should the ecosystem move forward or remain where it is?

2025/09/10 19:00

Author:yyy

Introduction:

The ecological development of Berachain's mainnet launch was far below expectations, shattering the native ecological protocol TGE plan. The on-chain protocol that has not yet issued a coin became a victim of the Berachain TGE.

Taking BearChain as an example, Monad is at a critical juncture, about to launch its mainnet, so where should the ecosystem protocols go from here? Some project owners have already left, while others are still holding on.

Monad and Berachain can be said to be the two high-performance L1 chains most favored by capital in this bull market. One represents the ultimate Ponzi cultural narrative, and the other leads the direction of change in ultra-high-performance public chains.

Institutional investors are also drawn to the native ecosystem protocols of Berachain and Monad. Berachain's star protocol, @InfraredFinance, has raised nearly $20 million across three rounds; @honeypotfinance, valued at $20 million; and @origami_fi, in which Berachain's founder and several BearChain veterans participated in the funding round.

Berachain launched its mainnet and synchronized TGE as early as February 6, but seven months have passed, and to this day there are still many protocols on Berachain that have not yet conducted TGE.

The financing data of @monad's on-chain ecosystem protocols is even more impressive than that of the Berachain ecosystem: MEV and LSD infrastructure layer @apr_labs completed multiple rounds of financing totaling $30.7 million; native CLOB DEX protocol @KuruExchange completed two rounds of financing totaling $13.6 million; native perp DEX @perpltrade completed $9.25 million in financing; prediction market protocol @opinionlabsxyz completed a $5 million Pre-Seed round of financing...

Without exception, all ecological protocols on the Monad chain are waiting for the launch of the Monad mainnet to start tge.

The Big Game of Ecological Protocol TGE Timing

Choosing the right time to launch a major on-chain ecosystem protocol is a game of strategic decision-making. Some projects choose to launch on other chains before the mainnet launch, some immediately after, and some wait and see how the ecosystem heats up and the overall crypto environment develops.

I wouldn't call the project's choice of TGE timing a "big gamble" but rather a "big game." This is because the "gamble" is based on completely asymmetric information, and ecosystem project owners are the most familiar with public chain teams. They have a strong sense of whether public chain teams are committed to concrete actions or just empty talk.

However, the ecosystem development and changes after the public chain mainnet launch are not fully under the team's control and are fraught with uncertainty and unknowns. The room for maneuver for ecosystem projects lies in the public chain team's market-making capabilities, ability to call orders, incentive measures, and most importantly, expectations for future crypto market trends.

During the long wait for @monad's mainnet launch, many projects gave up and chose to move to other chains. Representative projects, such as @Kintsu_xyz, the Monad native LSD protocol, ultimately chose to launch their mainnet on the @HyperliquidX chain.

postscript

According to multiple sources, @monad is expected to launch its mainnet and tge in Q4. Before the mainnet launch, some protocols similar to @Kintsu_xyz may choose to leave.

But I believe more native protocols will remain in place. Betting the survival of the protocol on a single native public chain is a great move, as everyone prospers together.

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Chinese Bitcoin Hardware Titans Control 95% of Market, Now Coming to America to Dodge Trump Tariff War

Chinese Bitcoin Hardware Titans Control 95% of Market, Now Coming to America to Dodge Trump Tariff War

Three of China’s largest Bitcoin hardware manufacturers are establishing production facilities in the United States as President Donald Trump’s tariff policies reshape the cryptocurrency industry. The three industry leaders, Bitmain, Canaan, and MicroBT, collectively control over 90% of the global mining rig market. These companies are the architects of Bitcoin’s physical infrastructure, manufacturing the specialized ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) machines that form the backbone of the world’s most valuable cryptocurrency network. Every Bitcoin mined globally likely passes through hardware bearing Chinese engineering fingerprints. 95% Market Control Sparks “Digital Dependency Trap” and Security Risks According to a June 18 Reuters report, these Bitcoin mining giants are establishing U.S. operations to circumvent potential tariffs. However, critics have raised security concerns about Chinese involvement in sectors spanning semiconductor manufacturing and energy infrastructure. Guang Yang, chief technology officer at crypto technology provider Conflux Network, described the situation as extending beyond trade policy. “The U.S.-China trade war goes beyond tariffs,” Yang stated. “It’s a strategic pivot toward ‘politically acceptable’ hardware sources.” Bitmain, the largest of the three companies by revenue, initiated U.S. production of mining equipment in December , one month after Trump’s presidential election victory. Canaan began trial production in the United States on April 2 to avoid tariffs following Trump’s announcement of new trade levies. One of the largest manufacturers of #bitcoin mining machines, Canaan, has set up a base of operations outside of China. CEO Zhang says, Kazakhstan is essential to "expanding after-sales geographical coverage and providing […] support growing international customer base" pic.twitter.com/7D5Xh2ici5 — Documenting ₿itcoin 📄 (@DocumentingBTC) June 23, 2021 Third-ranked MicroBT announced in a statement that it is “actively implementing a localization strategy in the U.S.” to “avoid the impact of tariffs.” $11.9B by 2028: The Market These Giants Are Fighting for According to Frost & Sullivan’s “2024 Global Blockchain Hardware Industry White Paper,” the ASIC-based Bitcoin mining hardware market demonstrates substantial consolidation. When measured by computing power sold, these three Chinese companies command 95.4% of the global market share. The Bitcoin ecosystem encompasses five primary segments: hardware supply, mining farm operations, mining pool management, trading platforms, and payment processing services. Hardware manufacturers like Canaan, the first Bitcoin mining company to go public and the second-largest by computing power , focus exclusively on integrated circuit (IC) design, manufacturing, and equipment sales. Industry analysts project continued sector expansion, with the market expected to reach $11.9 billion by 2028, representing a compound annual growth rate of 15.3%, contingent on Bitcoin’s continued price appreciation driven by supply scarcity. Source: Frost & Sullivan China’s Historical Bitcoin Mining Advantage Understanding today’s migration requires examining how China achieved such overwhelming market control in the first place. The foundation was laid during the historic 2017 Bitcoin boom, when three key factors aligned to create Chinese mining supremacy. During the early expansion phase, Chinese officials recognized cryptocurrency mining as a profitable venture that attracted substantial foreign investment. Consequently, authorities initially overlooked the mining sector while simultaneously restricting Bitcoin trading and initial coin offerings. Hydro-power plants go on sale in China since #Bitcoin mining crackdown has reduced demand for electricity. – South China Morning Post pic.twitter.com/QKEbUzWN4g — Bitcoin Archive (@BTC_Archive) June 30, 2021 China’s extensive hydroelectric infrastructure further strengthened the country’s mining operations, providing the cheap energy essential for profitable Bitcoin production. Does Chinese Hardware Control America’s Bitcoin Network? While the United States leads global Bitcoin mining operations with over 38% of total network activity , American miners depend almost entirely on Chinese-manufactured equipment. America Leads Bitcoin Mining Operation/ Source: Bitbo This creates what security analysts describe as a “digital dependency trap,” a scenario where America’s cryptocurrency infrastructure relies fundamentally on hardware produced by its primary economic rival. Guang Yang, Conflux Network’s chief technology officer, frames this dependency in geopolitical terms that extend far beyond trade economics . “The U.S.-China trade war goes beyond tariffs,” Yang explains. “It’s a strategic pivot toward ‘politically acceptable’ hardware sources.” His assessment reflects growing concerns within the cryptocurrency community about supply chain vulnerabilities that could impact national economic security.
Partager
CryptoNews2025/06/19 04:26
Partager
The Day I Faced My Biggest Trading Loss

The Day I Faced My Biggest Trading Loss

…and the 7 Rules That Saved MeContinue reading on Coinmonks »
Partager
Medium2025/09/10 22:33
Partager