France and Germany rally EU support for fresh restrictions on Russian oil giants

2025/09/09 21:20

France and Germany want the European Union to go after Russia’s energy profits by naming its largest oil companies in the bloc’s next sanctions package.

The proposal demands the EU include Lukoil and its trading arm Litasco in the 19th round of penalties, to choke off what Paris and Berlin call “Moscow’s capacity to export its oil.”

The demand is backed by both governments but came with no public comment from either, as negotiations continue behind closed doors.

The EU’s next sanctions package is still in development, but it already includes plans to target Russian banks and escalate pressure on the country’s energy sector. Every round of sanctions must be approved unanimously by all member states.

Hungary has blocked previous efforts to punish oil firms, and it’s expected to fight back again. But this time, France and Germany are pushing for broader tools: the sanctions draft also goes after Russia’s shadow fleet of tankers that bypass current restrictions and the traders in third countries helping move the oil.

EU and US aim to close loopholes and crack down globally

The EU is now trying to coordinate this new package with the United States, whose officials are hosting an EU delegation in Washington this week to align both strategy and enforcement.

Talks include secondary sanctions, more levies on buyers of Moscow’s oil, and penalties targeting the covert oil fleet operated by Moscow. Lukoil and Rosneft PJSC are both on the radar of Washington’s Treasury Department.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, “We are prepared to increase pressure on Russia, but we need our partners in Europe to follow.”

The White House, under President Donald Trump, has avoided placing direct sanctions on Putin so far. Trump has missed several self-imposed deadlines and has not responded directly to Vladimir Putin’s refusal to negotiate peace.

But Trump has taken action elsewhere; he doubled tariffs on India to 50% in response to India’s continued purchases of Russian crude.

In the same proposal, France and Germany want tighter enforcement against Russia’s financial and logistics networks that help the Kremlin dodge existing sanctions. Some EU capitals want to go even further, applying sanctions on civilian sectors that are feeding Russia’s military supply chain.

EU turns up pressure on Russia

As Russia’s economy starts to show more stress, Brussels sees this as a way to shut down military production disguised under civilian industries.

The upcoming package could also remove special carve-outs that let companies like Rosneft continue operations under previous exemptions. Alongside that, the EU is preparing to ban exports of key goods and chemicals used by Russia’s arms industry and restrict access for foreign firms, including those based in China, that keep supplying banned items.

The EU is also examining how to cut China’s support to Russia’s war machine. Beijing has become a main supplier of drones and other military tech now deployed in Ukraine. Some of the sanctions under discussion would restrict trade with Chinese firms helping boost Russia’s military manufacturing.

Other ideas in the works include visa restrictions, actions against ports dealing with sanctioned vessels, and bans on services like artificial intelligence that could be used by Russia’s military. Everything is on the table, and EU ambassadors were already briefed over the weekend. The full sanctions package is expected to be formally proposed within days.

Russia remains under some of the harshest economic sanctions in history, but it has kept exporting oil by re-routing trade through India, China, and other states. Moscow also continues to access restricted goods using middlemen in third countries.

That’s why this new round is trying to shut every backdoor. The final sanctions list may still change, depending on negotiations with EU capitals in the coming days.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Pioneering Breakthrough: US and South Korea Forge Ahead on Digital Asset Policy

Pioneering Breakthrough: US and South Korea Forge Ahead on Digital Asset Policy

BitcoinWorld Pioneering Breakthrough: US and South Korea Forge Ahead on Digital Asset Policy The world of digital assets is rapidly evolving, and with it, the urgent need for robust regulatory frameworks. A recent high-level meeting between South Korean lawmaker Min Byung-deok and former U.S. Representative Patrick McHenry underscores a pivotal moment for global digital asset policy. This significant discussion, reported by ET News, signals a strong intent to foster international collaboration. On Tuesday, these two influential figures exchanged views on crucial aspects of crypto regulation. Their dialogue aims to pave the way for a more harmonized future, addressing the complexities and opportunities presented by the burgeoning digital economy. Why is Digital Asset Policy Cooperation Crucial? The digital asset space transcends national borders. A lack of unified standards can unfortunately hinder innovation and create regulatory arbitrage. Therefore, cooperation, like this important discussion on digital asset policy, is absolutely essential for ensuring compatibility and interoperability across different markets. This proactive approach seeks to build a stable and secure environment for all participants worldwide. By working together, nations can mitigate risks, foster innovation, and unlock the full potential of blockchain technology. Such collaborative efforts are foundational for a thriving global digital economy. Shaping the Future: Key Areas of Digital Asset Policy Discussion The core of their conversation centered on two critical pillars: Enacting a Basic Law for Digital Assets: This involves establishing foundational legal principles to govern the entire digital asset ecosystem. Such a framework provides much-needed clarity and a predictable environment for businesses and investors alike. Institutionalization of Stablecoins: Stablecoins, designed to maintain a stable value, are increasingly important for transactions and financial stability. Their proper integration into traditional financial systems requires careful regulatory consideration to manage risks while harnessing their potential benefits. Both Min and McHenry agreed on the necessity of strengthening cooperation between the U.S. and South Korea. This collaboration is vital for improving the compatibility and interoperability of their respective digital asset policy frameworks, setting a global example for others to follow. The Wisdom Behind a Forward-Thinking Digital Asset Policy Former Rep. McHenry, with his extensive experience as chairman of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, offered valuable insights. He commended the approach, stating that “addressing the entire digital asset ecosystem is a very wise and forward-thinking strategy.” He further emphasized South Korea’s unique opportunity: “South Korea could achieve legislation far superior to that of most other countries if it firmly establishes foundational principles.” This highlights the immense benefit of a comprehensive, principle-based digital asset policy. By laying strong groundwork now, South Korea can position itself as a global leader in responsible innovation. This can potentially set a benchmark for other nations to follow, demonstrating how to balance progress with protection effectively and responsibly. Navigating the Complexities of Digital Asset Policy While the path to harmonized digital asset policy is promising, it is not without its challenges. Policymakers frequently encounter several hurdles: Regulatory Divergence: Different nations often have varied legal traditions and economic priorities, making it complex to align regulations seamlessly across borders. Rapid Technological Change: The pace of innovation in digital assets often outstrips the speed of legislative processes. This requires flexible and adaptable policy frameworks that can evolve quickly. Consumer Protection vs. Innovation: Striking the right balance between safeguarding investors and fostering technological advancement is a continuous tightrope walk for policymakers. These high-level discussions are crucial steps in addressing these complexities head-on. They aim for solutions that promote both security and growth within the digital asset sector, ensuring a robust future. The meeting between Min Byung-deok and Patrick McHenry represents a significant stride towards global collaboration on digital asset policy. Their shared vision for robust legislation and the institutionalization of stablecoins underscores a collective commitment to building a more secure, interoperable, and innovative digital asset landscape. This partnership could indeed set a powerful precedent for future international regulatory efforts, shaping the future of finance for everyone. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What was the primary focus of the meeting between Min Byung-deok and Patrick McHenry? A1: The primary focus was to discuss crucial aspects of digital asset policy, including enacting a basic law for digital assets and the institutionalization of stablecoins, aiming for enhanced US-South Korea cooperation. Q2: Why is international cooperation important for digital assets? A2: International cooperation is vital because digital assets transcend national borders. It helps ensure compatibility and interoperability between different markets, mitigating risks and fostering innovation through harmonized digital asset policy. Q3: What did Patrick McHenry say about South Korea’s potential in digital asset legislation? A3: McHenry commented that South Korea has the potential to achieve legislation far superior to that of most other countries if it firmly establishes foundational principles for its digital asset policy. Q4: What are stablecoins, and why are they a key discussion point? A4: Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, often pegged to a fiat currency. Their institutionalization is a key discussion point because proper regulation is needed to manage risks and integrate them safely into financial systems. Q5: What challenges do policymakers face in developing digital asset policy? A5: Policymakers face challenges such as regulatory divergence among nations, the rapid pace of technological change requiring adaptable frameworks, and balancing consumer protection with fostering innovation. Did you find this discussion on US-South Korea digital asset cooperation insightful? Share this article with your network on social media to spread awareness about the evolving landscape of global digital asset policy and the crucial steps being taken towards a more secure and innovative future! To learn more about the latest digital asset policy trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation and institutional adoption. This post Pioneering Breakthrough: US and South Korea Forge Ahead on Digital Asset Policy first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
Partager
Coinstats2025/09/10 14:15
Partager